Development of a Hypersonic Aircraft Design Optimization Tool

Article Preview

Abstract:

The design and optimization of hypersonic aircraft is severely impacted by the high temperatures encountered during flight as they can lead to high thermal stresses and a significant reduction in material strength and stiffness. This reduction in rigidity of the structure requires innovative structural concepts and a stronger focus on aeroelastic deformations in the early design and optimisation of the aircraft structure. This imposes the need for a closer coupling of the aerodynamic and structural design tools than is current practice. The paper presents the development of a multi-disciplinary, closely coupled optimisation suite for hypersonic aircraft. An overview of the setup and structure of the optimization suite is given and the integration between the Tranair solver, used to determine the aerodynamic loads and temperatures, and MSC/NASTRAN, used for the structural sizing and design, will be given.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

847-852

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Verstraete, D., Sharifzadeh, S. & Hendrick, P., Definition and Aero-Elastic Optimisation of the Structure of the LAPCAT A2 Mach 6 Airliner,. Brisbane, Australia, (2012).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-5942

Google Scholar

[2] Reaction Engines, LAPCAT A2, 2012. [Online]. Available: http: /www. reactionengines. co. uk/lapcat. html. [Accessed 14 June 2013].

Google Scholar

[3] T. Tsuchiya and Y. Takenaka, Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation for Hypersonic Experimental Vehicle, AIAA Journal, vol. 45, no. 7, pp.1655-1662, (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/1.26668

Google Scholar

[4] Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, JAXA Vision - JAXA 2025, Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, 2005. Accessible Online: http: /www. jaxa. jp/about/2025/pdf/jaxa_vision_e. pdf. [Accessed 18 June 2013].

DOI: 10.2514/6.iac-06-c3.1.04

Google Scholar

[5] C. R. McClinton, X-43–Scramjet Power Breaks the Hypersonic Barrier, Reno, Nevada, (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] R. Varvill and A. Bond, The Skylon Spaceplane: Progress to realisation, Journal British Interplanetary Society, vol. 61, pp.412-418, (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Barthelemy, Recent Progress in the National Aerospace Plane Program, IEEE AES Magazine, pp.3-12, May (1989).

Google Scholar

[8] L. Cavagna and et. al., NEOCASs: An Open Sopurce Environment for the Aeroelastic Analysis at Conceptual Design Level, Brisbane, Australia, (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] K. G. Bowcutt and S. J. Hatakeyama, Challenges, enabling technologies and technology maturity for responsive space, (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] T. A. Heppenheimer, Facing the Heat Barrier: A history of hypersonics, 1st ed., Washington, DC: NASA History Division, (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] H. McComb, Structures and Materials Technology for Hypersonic Aerospacecraft, NASA Technical Memorandum 102583, (1990).

Google Scholar

[12] R. D. Quin and R. A. Fields, Comparison of Measured and Calculated temperatures for a Mach 8 Hypersonic Wing Test Structure, NASA Ames Research Center, Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, California , (1986).

Google Scholar

[13] C. R. McClinton, V. L. Rausch, L. T. Nguyen and J. R. Sitz, Preliminary X-43 flight test results, Acta Astronautica, vol. 1, no. 57, pp.266-276, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.03.060

Google Scholar

[14] R. M. Amundsen, C. P. Leonard and W. E. B. III, Hyper-X Hot Structures Comparison of Thermal Analysis and Flight Data, Pasedena, CA, USA, (2004).

Google Scholar

[15] J. M. Robinson, An Overview of NASA's integrated Design and Engineering Analysis (IDEA) Environment, AIAA, (2011).

Google Scholar

[16] D. K. Snapp and R. C. Pomeroy, A Geometry System For Aerodynamic Design, St. Louis Missouri, (1987).

Google Scholar

[17] F. T. Johnson, et. al"TranAir: A Full-Potential, Solution Adaptive, Rectangular Grid Code for Predicting Subsonic, Transonic and Supersonic Flows about Arbitrary Configurations: User's Manual, " Boeing Military Airplane Company, Seattle, Washington, (1992).

Google Scholar

[18] F. T. Johnson, E. N. Tinoco and N. J. Yu, Thirty Years of Development and Application of CFD at Boeing Commerical Airplanes, Seattle, Seattle.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-3439

Google Scholar

[19] J. D. Anderson, Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics, 2nd ed., Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (2006).

Google Scholar

[20] Collier, C., Yarrington, P., Pickenheim, M., & Bednarcyk, B., An Approach to Preliminary Design and Analysis,. In 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference 23 - 26 April 2007, Honolulu, Hawaii. AIAA.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-2176

Google Scholar