Evaluations of Mechanical Properties and Residual Strength of Drilled Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper investigates the mechanical properties of drilled and non-drilled glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites of plain woven and stitch bi-axial ±45° fabrics. Vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding was employed to fabricate the composite panels. In the first stage of this study, mechanical properties such as tensile strength, flexural strength, and volume fraction of the composites were determined by per ASTM standards. Later on, the fabricated GFRP composites were drilled in order to investigate the delamination damage. Based on this issue, residual strength was evaluated after drilling process using constant feed rate and spindle speed but different drill bit geometries, which include twist drill bit and step drill bit. Experimental results showed that plain woven performed better in term of mechanical properties and residual strength after drilling process. In addition, residual strengths of drilled composites using step drill bit exhibited superior performance than that of the twist drill.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

270-274

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. K. Kaw, Mechanics of Composite Materials. London, New York: CRC Press LLC, 1997, p.321.

Google Scholar

[2] K. V. Kumar, P. R. Reddy, and D. V. R. Shankar, Effect of Angle Ply Orientation On Tensile Properties Of Bi Directional Woven Fabric Glass Epoxy Composite Laminate, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res., vol. 3, no. 10, p.55–61, (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] N. Zarif, H. Heidary, G. Minak, and M. Ahmadi, Effect of the drilling process on the compression behavior of glass / epoxy laminates, Composite Structures, vol. 98, p.59–68, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.044

Google Scholar

[4] S. Alam, F. Habib, M. Irfan, W. Iqbal, and K. Khalid, Effect of Orientation of Glass Fiber on Mechanical Properties of GRP Composites, J. Chem. Society Pakistan, vol. 32, no. 3, p.265–269, (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Yuhazri, P. T. Phongsakorn, and H. Sihombing, A Comparison Process Between Vacuum Infusion and Hand Lay-Up Method Toward Kenaf / Polyster Composites, Int. Journal Basic & Applied Science, vol. 10, no. 03, p.54–57, (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Yuanjian and D. H. Isaac, Combined Impact and Fatigue of Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 39, p.505–512, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.005

Google Scholar

[7] U. A. Khashaba and M. A. Seif, Effect of Different Loading Conditions On the Mechanical Behavior of [ 0 / ± 45 / 90 ] s Woven Composites, Compos. Struct., vol. 74, p.440–448, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.024

Google Scholar

[8] K. K. Chawla, Composite Materials: Science and Engineering, 3th ed. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LCC, 2012, p.552.

Google Scholar