Phenomenological Modelling of Impact Toughness Transition Behaviour

Article Preview

Abstract:

The toughness transition behavior of ferritic steel results from the fact that two competing fracture mechanisms can be activated independently or progressively. Temperature, strain rate and the material ́s hardening properties are the major influences affecting the result of this competition between cleavage and ductile fracture mechanisms. An elastic visco-plastic plasticity model with stress-state dependent yielding and isotropic hardening forms the basis of a model to predict the Charpy impact toughness properties of steels with bcc crystal structure for transition behavior. A scalar damage variable is coupled into the yield potential in order to capture the effects of damage induced softening. The corresponding damage evolution law considers damage initiation criteria for both mentioned fracture mechanisms. Material parameter identifications and successful model application in terms of Charpy impact toughness tests are demonstrated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

27-34

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Besson, Continuum models of ductile fracture: A review. Int J Damage Mech 19 (2009) 3–52.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Münstermann, J. Lian, W. Bleck, Design of damage tolerance in high-strength steels. Int J Mat Res 103 (2012) 755–764.

DOI: 10.3139/146.110697

Google Scholar

[3] A.L. Gurson, Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I–Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater-T ASME 99 (1977) 2–15.

DOI: 10.2172/7351470

Google Scholar

[4] V. Tvergaard, Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane-strain conditions. Int J Fracture 17 (1981) 389–407.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00036191

Google Scholar

[5] V. Tvergaard, On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fracture 18 (1982) 237–252.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00015686

Google Scholar

[6] V. Tvergaard, A. Needleman, Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall Mater 32 (1984) 157–169.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-x

Google Scholar

[7] L.M. Kachanov, On the creep rupture time (In Russian). Izv. AN SSSR, Otd. Tehn. Nauk 8 (1958) 26–31.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Lemaitre, A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol 107 (1985) 83–89.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Lemaitre, A course on damage mechanics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1996).

Google Scholar

[10] F.M. Andrade Pires, J.M.A. Cesar de Sa, L. Costa Sousa, R.M. Natal Jorge, Numerical modelling of ductile plastic damage in bulk metal forming, Int J Mech Sci 45 (2003) 273-294.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(03)00051-1

Google Scholar

[11] R. Hambli, Comparison between Lemaitre and Gurson damage models in crack growth simulation during blanking process. Int J Mech Sci 43 (2001) 2769-2790.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(01)00070-4

Google Scholar

[12] G.R. Johnson, W.H. Cook, Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21 (1985) 31–48.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Bao, T. Wierzbicki, On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 46 (2004) 81–98.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006

Google Scholar

[14] Y.L. Bai, T. Wierzbicki, A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and lode dependence. Int J Plasticity 24 (2008) 1071–1096.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004

Google Scholar

[15] J. Lian, M. Sharaf, F. Archie, S. Münstermann, A hybrid approach for modelling of plasticity and failure behaviour of advanced high-strength steel sheets. Int J Damage Mech 22 (2013) 188–218.

DOI: 10.1177/1056789512439319

Google Scholar

[16] J. Lian, J. Wu, S. Münstermann, Evaluation of the cold formability of high-strength low-alloy steel plates with the modified Bai–Wierzbicki damage model, Int J Damage Mech 24 (2015) DOI: 10. 1177/1056789514537587.

DOI: 10.1177/1056789514537587

Google Scholar

[17] S. Buchkremer, B. Wu, D. Lung, S. Münstermann, F. Klocke, W. Bleck, FE simulation of machining processes with a new material model, J Mater Process Tech 214 (2014) 599-611.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.10.014

Google Scholar

[18] D. Novokshanov, B. Döbereiner, M. Sharaf, S. Münstermann, J. Lian, A New Model for Metal Toughness Assessment with a Computationally Efficient Parameter Identification Algorithm, under review for Eng Fract Mech.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.07.069

Google Scholar

[19] E. Orowan, Fracture and Strength of Solids, Rep Prog Phys 12 (1948) 185-232.

Google Scholar

[20] R.O. Ritchie, J.F. Knott, J.R. Rice, On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel, J Mech Phys Solids 21 (1973) 395-410.

DOI: 10.2172/4442244

Google Scholar

[21] F.M. Beremin, A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel, Metall Trans A 14A (1983) 2277-2287.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02663302

Google Scholar

[22] P. Kucharczyk, S. Münstermann, Characterization of ductile failure behavior of the ferritic steel using damage mechanics modeling approach, Key Eng Mat 525-526 (2013) 469-472.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.525-526.469

Google Scholar