Numerical Analysis of Normal Contact Stiffness of Rough Surfaces

Abstract:

A numerical model was proposed to investigate the contact behaviour of a solid with a rough surface squeezed against a rigid flat plane. We considered simulated hierarchical surface structures as well as scanned surface data obtained by the profilometry of isotropically roughened specimens. The simulated and treated surfaces were characterised using statistical and fractal parameters. The evolution of contact stiffness under increasing normal compression was analysed through the total truncated area at varying heights, in order to relate contact mechanics to different surface parameters employed for surface characterisation. For a relatively small surface interference, the predicted stress-dependent normal contact stiffness of both scanned and simulated surfaces is in good agreement with experimental observation from nanoindentation tests, revealing a power-law function of the normal load, with the exponent of this relationship closely depending on the fractal dimension of rough surfaces. The numerical results show that the amplitude of a fractal rough surface mainly contributes to the magnitude of the contact stiffness at a given normal load.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 846)
• Pages: 300-305
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.846.300
• Online since: July 2016
• Authors: Chong Pu Zhai*, Yi Xiang Gan, Dorian Hanaor
• Keywords: Computational Contact Mechanics, Contact Stiffness, Fractal Dimension, Surface Roughness

References

[1] B. Persson, O. Albohr, U. Tartaglino, A. Volokitin, E. Tosatti, On the nature of surface roughness with application to contact mechanics, sealing, rubber friction and adhesion, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 17 (2005) R1.

DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/17/1/r01

[2] V.L. Popov, Contact mechanics and friction, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, (2010).

[3] J. Greenwood, J. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 295 (1966) 300-319.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1966.0242

[4] A. Bush, R. Gibson, T. Thomas, The elastic contact of a rough surface, Wear, 35 (1975) 87-111.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(75)90145-3

[5] W. Chang, I. Etsion, D.B. Bogy, An elastic-plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces, Journal of tribology, 109 (1987) 257-263.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3261348

[6] W. Yan, K. Komvopoulos, Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces, Journal of Applied Physics, 84 (1998) 3617-3624.

DOI: 10.1063/1.368536

[7] S. Jiang, Y. Zheng, H. Zhu, A contact stiffness model of machined plane joint based on fractal theory, Journal of Tribology, 132 (2010) 011401.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4000305

[8] R. Pohrt, V.L. Popov, Normal contact stiffness of elastic solids with fractal rough surfaces, Physical Review Letters, 108 (2012) 104301.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.108.104301

[9] R. Buzio, C. Boragno, F. Biscarini, F.B. De Mongeot, U. Valbusa, The contact mechanics of fractal surfaces, Nature Materials, 2 (2003) 233-236.

DOI: 10.1038/nmat855

[10] B. Lorenz, B. Persson, Interfacial separation between elastic solids with randomly rough surfaces: comparison of experiment with theory, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21 (2009) 015003.

DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/1/015003

[11] D. Mulvihill, H. Brunskill, M. Kartal, R. Dwyer-Joyce, D. Nowell, A comparison of contact stiffness measurements obtained by the digital image correlation and ultrasound techniques, Experimental Mechanics, 53 (2013) 1245-1263.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-013-9718-5

[12] G. Carbone, F. Bottiglione, Asperity contact theories: Do they predict linearity between contact area and load?, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 56 (2008) 2555-2572.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.03.011

[13] C. Zhai, D. Hanaor, G. Proust, Y. Gan, Stress-Dependent Electrical Contact Resistance at Fractal Rough Surfaces, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, (2015) B4015001.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000967

[14] H. Xie, J. -a. Wang, Direct fractal measurement of fracture surfaces, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 36 (1999) 3073-3084.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(98)00141-3

[15] P. Liu, H. Zhao, K. Huang, Q. Chen, Research on normal contact stiffness of rough surface considering friction based on fractal theory, Applied Surface Science, 349 (2015) 43-48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.174

[16] B.B. Mandelbrot, The fractal geometry of nature, Macmillan, (1983).

[17] D.A. Hanaor, Y. Gan, I. Einav, Effects of surface structure deformation on static friction at fractal interfaces, Geotechnique Letters, 3 (2013) 52-58.

DOI: 10.1680/geolett.13.016

[18] L. Kogut, R.L. Jackson, A comparison of contact modeling utilizing statistical and fractal approaches, Journal of tribology, 128 (2006) 213-217.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2114949

[19] G. Pharr, W. Oliver, F. Brotzen, On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation, Journal of materials research, 7 (1992) 613-617.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1992.0613

[20] W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology, Journal of Materials Research, 19 (2004) 3-20.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3