Hydrophobic Modification of Natural Cellulose Fiber with MMA via Surface-Initiated ARGET ATRP

Article Preview

Abstract:

To convert the hydrophilic cotton fiber into hydrophobic, grafting methyl methacrylate (MMA) on cotton fiber surface using ARGET (activators regenerated by electron transfer) ATRP (atom transfer radical polymerization) was studied in this paper. Four parallel experiments with different reaction time (2h/4h/6h/8h) were designed. The modified cotton fibers and the untreated control were examined using FTIR, SEM and contact angle analysis. The results show that as the reaction time prolonged, the peak of carbonyl stretching band of 2-bromoester at 1730cm-1 was stronger and the surface of cotton fiber was rougher, which demonstrates MMA has been grafted on the surface of cotton fiber successively and its amount increases with the reaction time. As the results of contact angle measurement, it shows that the hydrophilicity of cotton fiber can easily be modified by grafting of MMA, but the increasing amount of grafting chain had no obvious effects on further improving its hydrophobicity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

90-94

Citation:

Online since:

March 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.J. Edgar, C.M. Buchanan and J.S. Debenham, et al: Prog. Polym. Sci. Vol. 26(2001), p.1605.

Google Scholar

[2] M Baiardo, G Frisoni and M Scandola, et al: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Vol. 83(2002), p.38.

Google Scholar

[3] HL Kang, WY Liu and BQ He, et al: Polymer. Vol. 47(2006), p.7927.

Google Scholar

[4] K.C. Gupta and K. Khandekar: Biomacromolecules. Vol. 4(2003), p.758.

Google Scholar

[5] J Han, F Cheng and YP Wei: Chinese of Polym. Bull. Vol. 12(2009), p.25.

Google Scholar

[6] D. Plackett, K. Jankova and H. Egsgaard, et al: Biomacromolecules. Vol. 6(2005), p.2474.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Carlmark and E.E. MalmstrÖm: J Am Chem Soc. Vol. 124(2002), p.900.

Google Scholar

[8] ZT Liu, CA Sun and ZW Liu, et al: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Vol. 113(2009), p.3612.

Google Scholar

[9] E. Östmark, S. Harrisson and K. Wooley, et al: Biomacromolecules. Vol. 8(2007), p.1138.

Google Scholar

[10] V. Castelvetro, M. Geppi and S. Giaiacopi, et al: Biomacromolecules. Vol. 8(2006), p.498.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Matyjaszewski, H. Dong and W. Jakubowski, et al: Langmuir. Vol. 23(2007), p.4528.

Google Scholar

[12] W. Jakubowski, K. Min and K. Matyjaszewski: Macromolecules. Vol. 39(2006), p.39.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Hansson, E. Östmark and A. Carlmark, et al: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. Vol. 1(2009), p.2651.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Jonsson, D. Nyström and O. Nordin, et al: Eur. Polym. J. Vol. 45(2009), p.2374.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Carlmark and E. E Malmstrom: Biomacromolecules. Vol. 4(2003), p.1740.

Google Scholar