The Compaoparison of Characteristics of Fracture Toughness of Materials for Nuclear Piping by Use of Various Types of Specimens

Article Preview

Abstract:

Since it is difficult to cut off large specimens from nuclear piping, generally the standard CT specimens of 1T are used to perform fracture toughness tests. However, when compared with the test result obtained from a real pipe, the results from CT specimens are been known to be very conservative. Therefore, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission recommends the use of specimens whose thickness is greater than or equal to the thickness of a real pipe for estimating the stability of crack resistance[1]. In this study, a series of fracture toughness tests were performed using various types of specimens: the standard CT, non-standard Compact Pipe, and Curved CT. The results of the tests were compared.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 415-417)

Pages:

2281-2287

Citation:

Online since:

December 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] USNRC, Standard Review Plan, 3.6.3, "Leak Before Break Evaluation Procedures," Revision 1, 2007.

Google Scholar

[2] ASTM, "Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness," ASTM Standard E1820-08a

Google Scholar

[3] J.R. Rice, 1968, "A Path Independent Integral and Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notchs and Cracks", International Journal of Applied Mechanics, pp.379-386

DOI: 10.1115/1.3601206

Google Scholar

[4] S.Park, S.S. Yoo, J.K. Min, "Evaluation of Fracture Toughness Characteristic for Nuclear Piping using Various Types of Specimens", The 8th International Workshop on the Integrity of Nuclear Components (2010)

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2010-25540

Google Scholar

[5] S.S. Yoo, Y.Huh, J.M. Koo, C.S. Seok, "A Study on the Evaluation of the Fracture Toughness Characteristic Using the Curved CT Specimen", Korean Society for Precision Engineering, pp.475-476, (2009)

Google Scholar

[6] J. S. Dubey, S. L. Wadekar, R. N. Singh, T. K. Sinha and J. K. Chakravartty, 1999, "Assessment of Hydrogen Embrittlement of Zircaloy-2 Pressure Tubes Using Unloading Compliance and Load Normalization Techniques for Determining J-R Curves", Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 264, Issue 1-2, p.20~28

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(98)00487-5

Google Scholar

[7] Nam-Su Huh, "Prediction of Failure Behavior for Nuclear Piping Using Curved Wide-Plate Test", The Korean Society of Machanical Engineers, pp.352-361, (2004)

DOI: 10.3795/ksme-a.2004.28.4.352

Google Scholar

[8] A. Zahoor, M. F. Kanninen, 1981, "A plastic fracture mechanics prediction of fracture instability in a circumferentially cracked pipe in bending part Ⅰ. J-integral analysis", ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technology

DOI: 10.1115/1.3263413

Google Scholar

[9] X.K. Zhu, April 2006, "J-R curves corrected by load-independent constraint parameter in ductile crack growth", Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 68(2001), p.285~301

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00100-4

Google Scholar

[10] Yoon-Suk Chang, "Evaluation of Crack Length and Thickness Effects of Fracture Specimen using Damage Mechanics", Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering, vol. 23, No. 4

Google Scholar