A Robust Posterior Method to Multiresponse Optimization Using the VIKOR Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Setting of process variables to meet a required specification of quality characteristic (or response variable) in a process is one of common problems in the process quality control. But generally there are more than one quality characteristics in the process. In these situations, to obtain a satisfactory compromise in such a case, a decision maker (DM)’s preference information about the tradeoffs among the responses should be considered. In some cases, it is difficult for a DM to express an explicit approximation of the preference function. Therefore it can be effective to allow the decision maker to choose from a set of solutions. To this end, an algorithm is used to determine a representation of the nondominated solutions set. Such methods incorporate a posterior articulation of preferences. This paper proposes a posterior method based on taguchi’s signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios to facilitate the preference articulation process and incorporate both systematic and random deviations from target in a single criterion. Finally, the VIKOR method is used to extract of optimal compromise solution that leads to minimum variation in relative deviations of responses.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 433-440)

Pages:

3060-3065

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., and Wallenius, J. (1992). "Multiple Criteria Decision Support - A Review". European Journal of Operational Research, 63, 361-375.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90155-3

Google Scholar

[2] Hwang, C.L., Masud, A.S.M., Paidy, S.R., and Yoon, K. (1979). "Multiple Objective Decision Making – Methods and Application"s". Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

Google Scholar

[3] Harrington, E., Jr. (1965). "The Desirability Function". Industrial Quality Control, 21, 494-498.

Google Scholar

[4] Derringer, G. (1994). "A Balancing Act: Optimizing a Product's Properties". Quality Progress, 27, 51-57.

Google Scholar

[5] Derringer, G. and Suich, R. (1980). "Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables". Journal of Quality Technology, 12, 214-219.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968

Google Scholar

[6] Kim, K. and Lin, D. (2006). "Optimization of Multiple Responses Considering Both Location and Dispersion Effects". European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 133-145.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.020

Google Scholar

[7] Pignatiello, J. (1993). "Strategies for Robust Multiresponse Quality Engineering". IIETransactions, 25, 5-15.

Google Scholar

[8] Vining, G. (1998). "A Compromise Approach to Multiresponse Optimization". Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 309-313.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1998.11979867

Google Scholar

[9] Ko, Y., Kim, K., and Jun, C. (2005). "A New Loss Function- Based Method for Multiresponse Optimization". Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 50-59.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2005.11980300

Google Scholar

[10] Khuri, A.I., Conlon, M. (1981). " Simultaneous optimization of multiple response represented by polynomial regression functions". Technometrics 23, 363-375.

DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1981.10487681

Google Scholar

[11] Chiao, C., Hamada, M. (2001). "Analyzing experiments with correlated multiple responses". Journal of Quality Technology 33, 451–465.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2001.11980104

Google Scholar

[12] Amiri, M., Karimi, N., Jamshidi, S.F. (2008). "A methodology for optimizing statistical multi-response problems using genetic local search algorithm through fuzzy goal programming". Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 3199-3206.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.3199.3206

Google Scholar

[13] Kazemzadeh, R.B., Bashiri.M, Atkinson, A.C., Noorosana, R. (2008). "A general frame work for multi response optimization problems based on goal programming", European Journal of Operational Research 189, 421-429.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.030

Google Scholar

[14] Xu, K., Lin, D.K.J., Tang, L.C., Xie, M. (2004). "Multi-response system optimization using a goal attainment approach". IIE Transactions, 36, 433-445.

DOI: 10.1080/07408170490426143

Google Scholar

[15] Tong, L.I., Wang, C.H., Chen, H.C. (2005). " Optimization of multiple responses using principal component analysis and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution". Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27, 407-414.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2157-9

Google Scholar

[16] Jeong, I., Kim, K. (2003). "Interactive Desirability Function Approach to Multiresponse Surface Optimization". International Journal of Reliability, Quality And Safety Engineering 10, 205-217.

DOI: 10.1142/s0218539303001093

Google Scholar

[17] Jeong, I., Kim, K. (2005). " D-STEM: A Modified Step Method with Desirability Function Concept". Computers and Operations Research 32, 3175-3190.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2004.05.006

Google Scholar

[18] Jeong, I., Kim, K. (2009). " An Interactive Desirability Function Method to Multiresponse Optimization", European Journal of Operational Research 195: 412–426.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.018

Google Scholar

[19] Hertz, A., Jaumard, B., Ibeiro, C.C., Formosinho Filho, W.P. (1994). "A multi-criteria tabu search approach to cell formation problems in group technology with multiple objectives". Rech. Oper./Oper. Res. 28(3), 303–328.

DOI: 10.1051/ro/1994280303031

Google Scholar

[20] Schaffer, J. D. (1985). "Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In genetic algorithms and their applications", Proceedings of the First. International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 93-100. Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Google Scholar

[21] Fonseca, C. M. and Fleming, P. J., (1993). "Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization". Proceedings of the Fifth .International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 416-423. San Mateo, California

Google Scholar

[22] Erickson, M., Mayer, A. and Horn, J. (2001). "The niched Pareto genetic algorithm 2 applied to the design of groundwater remediation system"s. First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 681-695.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44719-9_48

Google Scholar

[23] Deb, K., Agarwal, S., Pratap, A. and Meyarivan, T. (2000). "A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization: NSGA-II". Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, 849-858. Paris, France.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83

Google Scholar

[24] Tong LI, Chen CC, Wang CH., (2007). "Optimization of Multi-Response Processes Using the VIKOR Method". International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31, 1049–1057.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0284-6

Google Scholar

[25] Jauregi, P., Gilmour, S., Varley, J., (1997). "Characterisation of colloidal gas aphrons for subsequent use for protein recovery". Chemical Engineering Journal 65, 1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/s1385-8947(96)03154-3

Google Scholar