Influence of Different Cooling Systems on Surface Roughness in the Turning of the Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Used as Biomaterial

Article Preview

Abstract:

Titanium and its alloy are materials with great application in the aeronautic and biomedical area. These applications have grown in the last decade due to high resistance to corrosion and biocompatibility of the Titanium alloys. However, Titanium and its alloys are classified as hard-to-machining materials that increase the production costs due to the highest tool wear. Thus, the finishing of components made of Titanium alloys can be impaired due to the complex shearing mechanism. This work shows a study of the influence of cooling systems and the input parameters on the turning of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Two depths of cut, two feed rates, new and worn tools, and three cooling systems were used as input parameters. The response was the surface roughness measured according to the Ra parameter. According to the results, it can be supported that the variation of all input parameters has influence on response. However, the most important input parameter on surface roughness was the feed rate. Thus, it can be concluded that the correct choice of the cutting parameters is relevant to produce high-quality components.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

155-160

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Jianxin, L. Yousheng, S. Wenlong, Diffusion wear in dry cutting of Ti–6Al–4V with WC/Co carbide tools, Wear. 265 (2008) 1776–1783.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.04.024

Google Scholar

[2] X. Yang, C.R. Liu, Machining Titanium and its alloys, Machining Science and Technology. 3(1) (1999) 107-139.

DOI: 10.1080/10940349908945686

Google Scholar

[3] A.R. Machado, J. Wallbank, Machining of Titanium and its alloys - A review, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 204 (1990) 53-60.

DOI: 10.1243/pime_proc_1990_204_047_02

Google Scholar

[4] K.A. Venugopal, S. Paul, A.B. Chattopadhyay, Tool wear in cryogenic turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, Cryogenics. 47 (2007) 12–18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2006.08.011

Google Scholar

[5] L.N. López De Lacalle, J. Pérez, J.I. Llorente, J.A. Sánchez, Advanced cutting conditions for the milling of aeronautical alloys, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 100 (2000) 1–11.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00372-6

Google Scholar

[6] J. Sun, Y.B. Guo, A comprehensive experimental study on surface integrity by end milling Ti–6Al–4V, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 209 (2009) 4036–4042.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.09.022

Google Scholar

[7] C.H. Che-Haron, A. Jawaid, The effect of machining on surface integrity of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V, Journal Materials Processing Technology. 166 (2005) 188–192.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.08.012

Google Scholar

[8] J.L. Canteroa, M.M. Tardiob, J.A. Cantelia, M. Marcosc, M.H. Miguelez, Dry drilling of alloy Ti–6Al–4V. International Journal Machine Tools & Manufacture. 45 (2005) 1246–1255.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.010

Google Scholar

[9] P.G. Benardos, G.C. Vosniakos, Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 43 (2003) 833–844

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(03)00059-2

Google Scholar

[10] Sandvik, Ferramentas rotativas – fresamento, furação, madrilamento, sistemas de ferramentas, (2011), [in Portuguese].

Google Scholar

[11] O. Çolak, C. Kurbanoglu, M.C. Kayacan, Milling surface roughness prediction using evolutionary programming methods, Materials and Design. 28/2 (2007) 657-666.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.07.004

Google Scholar

[12] L.C. Brandao, R.T. Coelho, A.R. Rodrigues, Experimental and theoretical study of workpiece temperature when end milling hardened steels using (TiAl)N-coated and PcBN-tipped tools, journal of materials processing technology. 199 (2008) 234–244.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.049

Google Scholar

[13] D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th Edition.John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1997).

Google Scholar