The Integrated Regulatory Philosophy of Non-Profit Public Investment Construction Projects in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

The inefficiency regulation on non-profit public investment construction projects (NPICP) is an important problem to puzzle Chinese government who wants to search for a scientific regulatory system. It is the complexity of regulatory system that causes the inefficiency. In order to deal with this problem, the integrated management philosophy was put forward to reduce the complexity and increased transparency. Then we designed the three dimensional integrated regulatory mode according to the regulatory principles. The system operation was emphasized on discussing the implementation procedures, designing operation procedures. This model may provide a new perspective for optimizing government regulatory mechanism.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 753-755)

Pages:

3144-3148

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wu Y., Yang Y., Feng T., Liu L., & Xu R. Government Investment Projects Collusion Regulatory Based on the Prospect Theory. ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications, 2(6), (2011). 1357-1363.

Google Scholar

[2] Wong E. M., Ormiston M. E., & Tetlock P. E. The Effects of Top Management Team Integrative Complexity and Decentralized Decision Making on Corporate Social Performance. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 54(6), (2011). 1207-1228.

DOI: 10.5465/amj.2008.0762

Google Scholar

[3] Demirag I., Dubnick M., & Khadaroo M. I. A Framework for Examining Accountability and Value for Money in the UK's Private Finance Initiative. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (15), (2004): 63-76.

DOI: 10.9774/gleaf.4700.2004.au.00008

Google Scholar

[4] Heald D. Value for Money Tests and Accounting Treatment in PFI Schemes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(3) , (2003). 342-371.

DOI: 10.1108/09513570310482291

Google Scholar

[5] Shaoul J. A Critical Financial Analysis of the Private Finance Initiative: Selecting a Financing Method or Allocating Economic Wealth? Critical Perspectives in Accounting, 16(4), (2005). 441-471.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.06.001

Google Scholar

[6] Breyer S. Regulation and Its Reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, (1982). 23-26.

Google Scholar

[7] David H. Value for Money Tests and Accounting Treatment in PFI Schemes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16(3), (2003). 342-371.

DOI: 10.1108/09513570310482291

Google Scholar