Analytical Model for Effect of Polymer Composite Membrane Properties on Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Abstract. Performance of direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC), using polymer composite membrane, can be directly affected by membrane properties, including permeability, proton conductivity and membrane thickness. In order to obtain high DMFC performance, methanol permeability of the membrane should be low, while keeping high proton conductivity. This may be achieved by modification of incorporating inorganic filler into high proton conducting membrane. In this work, the analytical modeling for DMFC performance prediction was developed to be a guideline for Nafion based membrane improvement. Methanol permeability and proton conductivity were set at 0.30 – 5.60 cm2×S-1 and 0.08 – 0.15 S×cm-1 with the thickness of 25 – 1000 μm. The results show that DMFC performance strongly depends on the methanol permeability especially with thin membrane giving maximum power density of 1034 and 100mW×cm-2 at the permeability of 0.30 and 5.60 cm2×S-1, respectively, with thickness of 45 μm, while with thick membrane the permeability has negligibly effect. However, the proton conductivity mainly affects DMFC performance only with thick membrane as a result of ohmic resistance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 931-932)

Pages:

95-100

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. Yoonoo, C. P. Dawson, E.P.L. Roberts, S. M. Holmes, Nafion/mordenite composite membranes for improved direct methanolfuel cell performance, J. Membr. Sci. 369 (2011) 367–374.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.030

Google Scholar

[2] V. Neburchilov, J. Martin, H. Wang, J. Zhang, A review of polymer electrolyte membranes for direct methanol fuel cells, J. Power Sources. 169 (2007) 221 – 238.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.044

Google Scholar

[3] V. Tricoli, F. Nannetti, Zeolite-Nafion composites as ion conducting membrane materials, J. Electrochem. 48 (2003) 2625 – 2633.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(03)00306-2

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ren, G. Sun, C. Li, Z. Liang, Z. Wu, W. Jin, X Qin, X. Yang, Organic silica/Nafion composite membrane for direct methanol fuel cells J. Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 450 – 455.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.050

Google Scholar

[5] X. Li, E.P.L. Roberts, S. M. Holmes, Evaluation of composite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells, J. Power Sources. 154 (2006) 115 – 123.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.222

Google Scholar

[6] A.A. Kulikovsky, A method for analysis of DMFC performance curve, J. Electrochem. 5(2003) 1030 – 1036.

Google Scholar

[7] J.G. Liu, T.S. Zhao, Z.X. Liang, R. Chen, Effect of membrane thickness on the performance and efficiency of passive direct methanol fuel cells, J. Power Sources. 153 (2006) 61 – 67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.190

Google Scholar

[8] A.A. Kulikocsky, The voltage–current curve of a direct methanol fuel cell exact and fitting equations. J. Electrochem. Commun. 4 (2002) 939 – 946.

DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2481(02)00494-0

Google Scholar