Tackling Variability of Clay to Provide a Robust Binder

Abstract:

Locally available and with infinite recycling possibilities, the use of earth as building material leads to one of the lowest environmental impacts in the construction sector. Recent advances in the earth materials field have been made based on concrete and ceramics technologies to facilitate its uses in dense areas. It is possible to modify clay particle interactions and the material's whole behavior by adding inorganic dispersants and flocculants into clay paste. Earth becomes easy to cast and unmold into formworks, and by removing cement in its composition, poured earth can reach a low CO₂ emission rate. Even if this technology is promising, further work has to be performed, as it cannot be implemented on earth from excavation sites with high variability. Tackling the clay nature variability is now the main issue to push this product on the market with robust properties. This research investigates the robustness of the poured earth binder. In this way, several clays (three montmorillonites, two kaolinites, and binary mixes at different proportions) were investigated. Their compacity (C) was determined following the water demand protocol with Vicat apparatus and compared to their consistency properties (liquidity and plasticity limits), and a correlation between these values is established. Different clay pastes prepared at different solid volume fractions were tested to define the influence of the clay nature on the paste consistency evolution. The results showed that clay nature for paste at high solid volume fraction does not influence constituency's evolution when their respectivecompacity is taking into account. It can be suggested that for a clay binder with a consistency close to C, which might be mandatory for poured earth application, only the swelling capacity might influence the mix design.

• Periodical: Construction Technologies and Architecture (Volume 1)
• Pages: 382-387
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.382
• Online since: January 2022
• Authors: Daria Ardant*, Coralie Brumaud, Guillaume Habert
• Keywords: Clay Properties, Compacity, Self-Compacted Clay Concrete, Variability

References

[1] Andrade, F.A., Al-Qureshi, H.A., Hotza, D., 2011. Measuring the plasticity of clays: A review. Appl. Clay Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.10.028.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.10.028

[2] Ardant, D., Brumaud, C., Habert, G., 2020. Influence of additives on poured earth strength development. Mater. Struct. Constr. 53, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01564-y.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-020-01564-y

[3] Castellini, E., Berthold, C., Malferrari, D., Bernini, F., 2013. Sodium hexametaphosphate interaction with 2:1 clay minerals illite and montmorillonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 83–84, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.08.031.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2013.08.031

[4] Feng, T.-W., 2001. A linear log d – log w model for the determination of consistency limits of soils . Can. Geotech. J. 38, 1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-061.

DOI: 10.1139/t01-061

[5] Fitton, T., Seddon, K., 2012. Relating Atterberg limits to rheology, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, p.273–284. https://doi.org/10.36487/acg_rep/1263_23_fitton.

DOI: 10.36487/acg_rep/1263_23_fitton

[6] Gasnier, H., 2019. Construire en terres d'excavation, un enjeu pour la ville durable. (PhD Thesis). Université Grenoble Alpes (CoMue). France.

[7] Guihéneuf, S., 2020. Formulation et renforts de blocs en matériau terre pour une utilisation structurelle. (PhD Thesis) Université de Bretagne Sud, France.

[8] Julloux, A., Brumaud, C., Habert, G., Perrot, A., 2020. Variability of clay in poured earth, in: Proceedings of the8th Internationale Fachtagung für Lehmbau (LEHM 2020) (virtual), Online Weimar: Dachverband Lehm e.V.

[9] Hamard, E., Lemercier, B., Cazacliu, B., Razakamanantsoa, A., Morel, J.C., 2018. A new methodology to identify and quantify material resource at a large scale for earth construction – Application to cob in Brittany. Constr. Build. Mater. 170, 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.097.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.097

[10] Koumoto, T., Houlsby, G.T., 2001. Theory and practice of the fall cone test. Géotechnique 51, 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.8.701.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.51.8.701.40475

[11] Landrou, G., Brumaud, C., Plötze, M.L., Winnefeld, F., Habert, G., 2018. A fresh look at dense clay paste: Deflocculation and thixotropy mechanisms. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 539, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.12.029.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.12.029

[12] Llatas, C., 2011. A model for quantifying construction waste in projects according to the European waste list. Waste Manag. 31, 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman. 2011.01.023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.023

[13] Lootens, D., Jousset, P., Martinie, L., Roussel, N., Flatt, R.J., 2009. Yield stress during setting of cement pastes from penetration tests. Cem. Concr. Res. 39, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.012.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.012

[14] Moevus, M., Jorand, Y., Olagnon, C., Maximilien, S., Anger, R., Fontaine, L., Arnaud, L., 2016. Earthen construction: an increase of the mechanical strength by optimizing the dispersion of the binder phase. Mater. Struct. Constr. 49, 1555–1568. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0595-5.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-015-0595-5

[15] Perrot, A., Rangeard, D., Lecompte, T., 2018. Field-oriented tests to evaluate the workability of cob and adobe. Mater. Struct. Constr. 51, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1181-4.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-018-1181-4

[16] Perrot, A., Rangeard, D., Levigneur, A., 2016. Linking rheological and geotechnical properties of kaolinite materials for earthen construction. Mater. Struct. Constr. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0813-9.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-016-0813-9

[17] Pinel, A., Jorand, Y., Olagnon, C., Charlot, A., Fleury, E., 2017. Towards poured earth construction mimicking cement solidification: demonstration of feasibility via a biosourced polymer. Mater. Struct. Constr. 50, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1092-9.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-017-1092-9

[18] Rojat, F., Hamard, E., Fabbri, A., Carnus, B., McGregor, F., 2020. Towards an easy decision tool to assess soil suitability for earth building. Constr. Build. Mater. 257, 119544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119544.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119544

[19] Sedran, T., De Larrard, F., Le Guen, L., 2007. Détermination de la compacité des ciments et additions minérales à la sonde de Vicat, Bulletin des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées.

DOI: 10.1016/s0152-9668(02)80022-5

[20] Vinceslas,T., 2019. Caractérisation d'éco-matériaux terre-chanvre en prenant en compte la variabilité des ressources disponibles localement. (PhD Thesis) Université de Bretagne Sud, France.

[21] Tourtelot, J., Ghattassi, I., Le Roy, R., Bourgès, A., Keita, E., 2021. Yield stress measurement for earth-based building materials: the weighted plunger test. Mater. Struct. 54. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01588-4.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-020-01588-4

[22] Vieira, C.S., Pereira, P.M., 2015. Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.resconrec.2015.07.023.