Evaluation of GHG Emissions from the Production of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT): Analysis of Different Life Cycle Inventories

Abstract:

The Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) has been receiving special attention in recent research as an alternative for climate change mitigation since it is a renewable source and can remove and stock high amounts of CO₂ from the atmosphere. Some countries, such as Brazil, still do not have mature and large CLT industry. However, the development of this industry in other countries is expected since the CLT is considered the main wood material to be used in high-rise mass timber buildings. It is particularly important to have environmental information, especially concerning the climate change impacts, in terms of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, for this product to increase its competitiveness in a new market. In this context, this research aimed to evaluate three different Life cycle inventories (LCIs) for CLT production of studies from Japan and the United States. Based on the first findings, we summarized the critical items in the LCI of CLT production and listed some actions for the reduction of GHG emissions that occur in this process. The LCIs are adapted considering the context of Brazil (a country with a cleaner electricity matrix) and China (a country with the highest share of fossil fuels). The main inconsistencies present in the LCIs are presented and discussed. The GHG emissions are concentrated in the following hotspots: (1) Roundwood production; (2) electricity consumption; and (3) adhesives production for CLT production. Therefore, the reduction of the consumption of these materials and activities should be encouraged for the decrease of GHG emissions. The data of Roundwood used in the modelling severely affects the final results. Their GHG emissions are related to the consumption of diesel in forestry activities. This research brings insights into the evaluation of the life cycle GHG emissions from the production of CLT.

• Periodical: Construction Technologies and Architecture (Volume 1)
• Pages: 635-642
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.635
• Online since: January 2022
• Authors: Lucas Rosse Caldas*, Jorge Sierra-Pérez, Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, Marcos Silvoso
• Keywords: CLT, CO₂, Electricity, Hotspots, LCI, Roundwood

References

[1] Caldas, L.R., Saraiva, A.B., Andreola, V.M., Dias, R., Filho, T., 2020. Bamboo bio-concrete as an alternative for buildings ' climate change mitigation and adaptation. Constr. Build. Mater. 263, 120652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120652.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120652

[2] Caldas, L.R., Saraiva, A.B., Lucena, A.F.P., Da Gloria, M.Y., Santos, A.S., Filho, R.D.T., 2021. Building materials in a circular economy: The case of wood waste as CO2-sink in bio concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105346.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105346

[3] CEN, 2011. EN 15978:2011 - Sustainability of construction works — Assessment of environmental performance of buildings — Calculation method.

[4] Chen, C.X., Pierobon, F., Ganguly, I., 2019. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) produced in Western Washington: The role of logistics and wood species mix. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051278.

DOI: 10.3390/su11051278

[5] Chen, Z., Gu, H., Bergman, R.D., Liang, S., 2020. Comparative life-cycle assessment of a high-rise mass timber building with an equivalent reinforced concrete alternative using the athena impact estimator for buildings. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114708.

DOI: 10.3390/su12114708

[6] Darghouth, N.R., Barbose, G., Zuboy, J., Gagnon, P.J., Mills, A.D., Bird, L., 2021. Demand charge savings from solar PV and energy storage. Energy Policy 146, 111766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111766.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111766

[7] Demertzi, M., Sierra-Pérez, J., Paulo, J.A., Arroja, L., Dias, A.C., 2017. Environmental performance of expanded cork slab and granules through life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 145, 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.071.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.071

[8] Escamilla, E.Z., Habert, G., Wohlmuth, E., 2016. When CO 2 counts : Sustainability assessment of industrialized bamboo as an alternative for social housing programs in the Philippines. Build. Environ. 103, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.003.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.003

[9] Ferdosian, F., Pan, Z., Gao, G., Zhao, B., 2017. Bio-based adhesives and evaluation for wood composites application. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9020070.

DOI: 10.3390/polym9020070

[10] Franco, L., Pozza, L., Saetta, A., Savoia, M., Talledo, D., 2019. Strategies for structural modelling of CLT panels under cyclic loading conditions. Eng. Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109476.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109476

[11] Jayalath, A., Navaratnam, S., Ngo, T., Mendis, P., Hewson, N., Aye, L., 2020. Life cycle performance of Cross Laminated Timber mid-rise residential buildings in Australia. Energy Build. 223, 110091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110091.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110091

[12] Lewis, E., Lewis, E., 2018. Environmental Product Declaration. Sustainaspeak 106–107. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315270326-75.

[13] Liang, S., Gu, H., Bergman, R., Kelley, S.S., 2020. Comparative life-cycle assessment of a mass timber building and concrete alternative. Wood Fiber Sci. https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2020-019.

DOI: 10.22382/wfs-2020-019

[14] Nakano, K., Koike, W., Yamagishi, K., Hattori, N., 2020. Environmental impacts of cross-laminated timber production in Japan. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 22, 2193–2205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01948-2.

DOI: 10.1007/s10098-020-01948-2

[15] Pacheco-Torgal, F., 2014. Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. Constr. Build. Mater. 51, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.058.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.058

[16] Pacheco-Torgal, F., Faria, J., Jalali, S., 2012. Embodied Energy versus Operational Energy. Showing the Shortcomings of the Energy Performance Building Directive (EPBD). Mater. Sci. Forum. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.730-732.587.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.730-732.587

[17] Puettmann, M., Sinha, A., Ganguly, I., 2019. Life cycle energy and environmental impacts of cross laminated timber made with coastal douglas-fir. J. Green Build. 14, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.14.4.17.

DOI: 10.3992/1943-4618.14.4.17

[18] Sierra-Pérez, J., Boschmonart-Rives, J., Dias, A.C., Gabarrell, X., 2016. Environmental implications of the use of agglomerated cork as thermal insulation in buildings. J. Clean. Prod. 126, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.02.146.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.146

[19] Stora Enso, 2020. Environmental Product Declaration CLT ( Cross Laminated Timber ). Int. EPD Syst.

[20] Thormark, C., 2002. A low energy building in a life cycle — its embodied energy , energy need for operation and recycling potential. Build. Environ. 37, 429–435.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(01)00033-6

[21] UNEP, 2019. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction. Towards a zero-emissions, effi cient and resilient buildings and constructi on sector.

[22] WBCSD, 2016. Global Cement Database on CO₂ and Energy Information.