Physical Properties and Hygrothermal Behavior of Mycelium-Based Composites as Foam-Like Wall Insulation Material

Article Preview

Abstract:

This research aims to study mycelium-based composites (MBC) by assessing their performance as foam-like wall insulation material. Various substrates have been selected to get optimized performance of the composite. Results showed that a prolonged growing period arose a denser mycelium outer layer in MBC, which rendered better water resistance due to the hydrophobicity of mycelium. Thermal conductivity and mechanical properties are highly dependent on substrate choices than other parameters of MBC, which coincided with the literature. Additionally, influences of accelerated aging test and moisture buffer capacity of MBC were first studied in this research. The results indicated that MBC not only maintained good functional performance after the accelerated aging test (i.e. drying and wetting cycles) but also constituted good moisture buffer capacity. This means that MBC has key material essences to apply as internal wall insulation material and become one of the layers in vapor-permeable building envelope systems to passively regulate indoor relative humidity and thermal comfort.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

643-651

Citation:

Online since:

January 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Abhijith, R., Ashok, A., & Rejeesh, C. R. (2018). Sustainable packaging applications from mycelium to substitute polystyrene : a review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(1), 2139–2145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.211.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.211

Google Scholar

[2] Binder, A., Zirkelbach, D., & Künzel, H. (2017). Test Method To Quantify The Wicking Properties Of Porous Insulation Materials Designed To Prevent Interstitial Condensation Test Method To Quantify The Wicking Properties Of Porous Insulation Materials Designed To Prevent Interstitial Condensation. AIP Conference Proceedings, 242(2010).

DOI: 10.1063/1.3453818

Google Scholar

[3] Cerolini, S., Orazio, M. D., Perna, C. Di, & Stazi, A. (2009). Moisture buffering capacity of highly absorbing materials. Energy & Buildings, 41, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.08.006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.08.006

Google Scholar

[4] Elsacker, E., Vandelook, S., Brancart, J., Peeters, E., & De Laet, L. (2019). Mechanical , physical and chemical characterisation of mycelium-based composites with different types of lignocellulosic substrates. PLoS ONE, 14(7).

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213954

Google Scholar

[5] Elsacker, E., Vandelook, S., Wylick, A. Van, Ruytinx, J., Laet, L. De, & Peeters, E. (2020). Science of the Total Environment A comprehensive framework for the production of mycelium-based lignocellulosic composites. Science of the Total Environment, 725, 138431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138431.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138431

Google Scholar

[6] Girometta, C., Picco, A. M., Baiguera, R. M., Dondi, D., Babbini, S., Cartabia, M., Pellegrini, M., & Savino, E. (2019). Physico-Mechanical and Thermodynamic Properties of Mycelium-Based Biocomposites : A Review. Sustainability, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010281.

DOI: 10.3390/su11010281

Google Scholar

[7] Jones, M., Chun, H., Yuen, R., & John, S. (2018). Waste ‐ derived low ‐ cost mycelium composite construction materials with improved fire safety. Wiley, April, 816–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2637.

DOI: 10.1002/fam.2637

Google Scholar

[8] Kreiger, B. K., & Srubar, W. V. (2019). Moisture buffering in buildings : A review of experimental and numerical methods. Energy & Buildings, 202, 109394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109394.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109394

Google Scholar

[9] Lee, J., Kim, J., Song, D., Kim, J., & Jang, C. (2017). Impact of external insulation and internal thermal density upon energy consumption of buildings in a temperate climate with four distinct seasons. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75(January 2016), 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.087.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.087

Google Scholar

[10] Roberts, B. C., Webber, M. E., & Ezekoye, O. A. (2015). Development of a multi-objective optimization tool for selecting thermal insulation materials in sustainable designs. Energy & Buildings, 105, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.063.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.063

Google Scholar

[11] Rode, C., Peuhkuri, R. H., Mortensen, L. H., Hansen, K. K., Time, B., Gustavsen, A., Ojanen, T., Ahonene, J., Svennberg, K., & Arfvidsson, J. (2005). Moisture Buffering of Building Materials. DTU.

DOI: 10.1520/stp45403s

Google Scholar

[12] Rode, C., Peuhkuri, R., Time, B., Svennberg, K., Ojanen, T., Mukhopadhyaya, P., Kumaran, M., & Dean, S. W. (2007). Moisture Buffer Value of Building Materials. Journal of ASTM International, 4(5), 100369. https://doi.org/10.1520/jai100369.

DOI: 10.1520/jai100369

Google Scholar