Performance of an Oscillating Water Column Wave Energy Converter Integrated with Three Types of Harbor Protection Structures

Abstract:

Oscillating water column (OWC) wave energy converters can be integrated in harbor protection structures, such as vertical, rubble mound and piled breakwaters. The interaction between the incident wave and the structure, in which the OWC device is integrated, is significantly different, since the structure of the vertical breakwater is impermeable, while that of the rubble mound breakwater is porous. The performance of the OWC device for the three configurations is analyzed for a range of wave periods from 6 to 12 s and a wave height of 1 m. The OWC device integrated into the vertical breakwater shows the best performance (maximum mean pneumatic power of 70 kW), and the mean pneumatic power is globally 3 % higher than that of the OWC device integrated into the rubble mound breakwater (maximum mean pneumatic power of 67.4 kW). The performance of the OWC device integrated into the piled breakwater shows a similar trend to the OWC device integrated into the vertical breakwater for wave periods lower than 9 s, but it has a significant loss of performance for higher wave periods.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 427)
• Pages: 63-73
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-BL5v8v
• Online since: July 2023
• Authors: Eric Didier, Paulo Roberto de Freitas Teixeira*
• Keywords: Numerical Simulation, Oscillating Water Column, RANS, Rubble Mound Breakwater, Vertical Breakwater

References

[1] A.F.O. Falcão, J.C.C. Henriques, Oscillating-water-column wave energy converters and air turbines: A review, Renewable Energy 85 (2016) 1391-1424.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.086

[2] Y. Masuda, M.E. McCormick, Experience in pneumatic wave energy conversion in Japan, in: M.E. McCormick, Y.C. Kim (Eds.), Utilization of ocean waves – wave to energy conversion, ASCE, New York, 1987, pp.1-33.

[3] H. Schlichting, Boundary-layer theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.

[4] F.H. Harlow, P. Nakayama, Transport of turbulence energy decay rate, Los Alamos Science Lab., University California Report LA-3854 (1968).

[5] C.W. Hirt, B.D. Nichols, Volume of fluid VOF method for the dynamics of free boundaries, Journal of Computers and Physics 39 (1) (1981) 201-225.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5

[6] FLUENT, User's Guide, ANSYS Inc. (2016).

[7] M. Peric, J.H. Ferziger, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Second ed., Springer, Berlin, 1997.

[8] P.Z. Lin, P.L.F. Liu, A numerical study of breaking waves in the surf zone, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 359 (1998) 239-264.

DOI: 10.1017/s002211209700846x

[9] A. Elhanafi, A. Fleming, Z. Leong, G. Macfarlane, Effect of RANS-based turbulence models on nonlinear wave generation in a two-phase numerical wave tank, Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics 17 (3) (2016) 141-158.

DOI: 10.1504/pcfd.2017.084350

[10] R.G. Dean, R.A. Dalrymple, Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists, Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering – Volume 2, World Scientific, 2000.

[11] E. Didier, P.R.F. Teixeira, M.G. Neves, A 3D Numerical Wave Tank for Coastal Engineering Studies, Defect and Diffusion Forum 372 (2017) 1-10.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.372.1

[12] P.R.F. Teixeira, E. Didier, M.G. Neves, A 3D RANS-VOF wave tank for oscillating water column device studies, in: VII International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, Nantes, France, 2017, pp.710-721.

[13] A.F.O. Falcão, Control of an oscillating-water-column wave power plant for maximum energy production, Applied Ocean Research 24 (2002) 73-82.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-1187(02)00021-4

[14] R.A.A.C. Gonçalves, P.R.F. Teixeira, E. Didier, F.R. Torres, Numerical analysis of the influence of air compressibility effects on an oscillating water column wave energy converter chamber, Renewable Energy 153 (2020) 1183-1193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.080

[15] M.R.A. Van Gent, Porous flow through rubble-mound material, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 121 (3) (1995) 176-181.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(1995)121:3(176)

[16] E. Didier, P.R.F. Teixeira, Validation and Comparisons of Methodologies Implemented in a RANS‐VoF Numerical Model for Applications to Coastal Structures, J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10 (2022) 1298.

DOI: 10.3390/jmse10091298

[17] M.R.A. Van Gent, Stationary and oscillatory flow through coarse porous media, Communications on Hydraulic and Geotechnical Engineering, Report Nº 93-9, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Delft University of Technology (1993).

[18] A. Nakayama, F. Kuwahara, A macroscopic turbulence model for flow in a porous medium, Journal of Fluids Engineering 121 (1999) 427-433.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2822227

[19] P. Higuera, J.L. Lara, I.J. Losada, Three-dimensional interaction of waves and porous coastal structures using OpenFOAM. Part I: Formulation and validation, Coastal Engineering 83 (2014) 243-258.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.08.010

[20] E. Didier, J.M. Paixão Conde, P.R.F. Teixeira, Numerical simulation of an oscillation water column wave energy converter with and without damping, in: Fourth International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 2011, pp.206-217.

[21] P.R.F. Teixeira, D.P. Davyt, E. Didier, R. Ramalhais, Numerical simulation of an oscillating water column device using a code based on Navier Stokes equations, Energy 61 (1) (2013) 513-530.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.062

[22] R.C. Lisboa, P.R.F. Teixeira, F.R. Torres, E. Didier, Numerical evaluation of the power output of an oscillating water column wave energy converter installed in the Southern Brazilian coast, Energy 162 (2018) 1115-1124.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.079

[23] N.G. Jacobsen, D.R. Fuhrman, J. Fredsoe, A wave generation toolbox for the open-source CFD library: OpenFOAM(R), International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 70 (2012) 1073-1088.

DOI: 10.1002/fld.2726

[24] B. Devolver, P. Trouch, P. Rauwoens, Performance of a buoyancy-modified k-ω and k-ω SST turbulence model for simulating wave breaking under regular waves using OpenFOAM®, Coastal Engineering 138 (2018) 49-65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.04.011