Investigation of Electrode Location to Improve the Accuracy of Wearable Hand Exoskeleton Trainer Based on Electromyography

Abstract:

EMG signal has a random and stochastic characteristics, so it is difficult to predict the amplitude. Furthermore, the EMG signal depends on the electrodes location. Therefore, a proper muscle selection determines the system's accuracy value. The purpose of this study was to investigate the exact location of the electrodes to improve the accuracy of the wearable hand exoskeleton trainer based on electromyography (EMG) signal control. The main advantage of the results of this study is that the most dominant muscle was found in the development of a wearable hand exoskeleton based on an EMG signal threshold. Therefore, the model can be controlled using a single electrode pair which can further be applied using a low-cost microcontroller. In this study, ten respondents were involved in the data acquisition. The discovery of the dominant muscle was carried out by investigating the dominant EMG signal in three muscles (Abductor pollicis longus, extensor digitorum) that plays a role in the open and close movements of the hand exoskeleton. Dry electrode was used to detect EMG signal activity on the skin surface. The EMG signal was then extracted using the root mean square (RMS) feature. After the evaluation, the results showed that the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle in the rest position produced higher accuracy value than the other muscles, which was 96.63±0.67%. In the implementation, the product of this research can be applied for rehabilitation steps in post-stroke patients which is carried out either in a medical rehabilitation unit or at home independently.

• Periodical: Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (Volume 55)
• Pages: 71-80
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-y7g473
• Online since: March 2022
• Authors: Triwiyanto Triwiyanto*, Triana Rahmawati, I Putu Alit Pawana, Evrinka Hikaristiana Maulidia
• Keywords: Electrode Location, EMG, Hand Exoskeleton, Muscle, Threshold

References

[1] K. John W, Arm Function after Stroke From Physiology,, Semin. Neurol., vol. 25, no. 4, p.384–395, (2005).

[2] T. Triwiyanto, I. P. A. Pawana, B. G. Irianto, T. B. Indrato, and I. D. G. H. Wisana, Embedded system for upper-limb exoskeleton based on electromyography control,, Telkomnika (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 17, no. 6, p.2992–3002, (2019).

DOI: 10.12928/telkomnika.v17i6.11670

[3] D. Leonardis et al., An EMG-controlled robotic hand exoskeleton for bilateral rehabilitation,, IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 8, no. 2, p.140–151, (2015).

DOI: 10.1109/toh.2015.2417570

[4] N. S. K. Ho et al., An EMG-driven Exoskeleton Hand Robotic Training Device on Chronic Stroke Subjects Task Training System for Stroke Rehabilitation,, in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2011.5975340

[5] A. Pascual-Leone, Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation.,, J. stroke, vol. 15, no. 3, p.174–81, (2013).

[6] J. J. Dowling, The use of electromyography for the noninvasive prediction of muscle forces. Current issues.,, Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), vol. 24, no. 2. p.82–96, (1997).

DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199724020-00002

[7] F. H. Martini, J. L. Nath, and E. F. Barholomew, Fundamental of Anatomy and Physiology, 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, (2012).

[8] M. Asghari Oskoei and H. Hu, Myoelectric control systems—A survey,, Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 2, no. 4, p.275–294, Oct. (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2007.07.009

[9] R. Tavares, P. Abreu, and M. R. Quintas, Data acquisition glove for hand movement impairment rehabilitation,, Int. J. Online Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, p.52–54, (2016).

DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v12i04.5141

[10] T. R. Munusamy, Hand Pattern Recognition Using Smart Band,, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, (2015).

[11] P. Laferriere, E. D. Lemaire, and A. D. C. Chan, Surface Electromyographic Signals Using Dry Electrodes,, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 60, no. 10, p.3259–3268, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/tim.2011.2164279

[12] J. V Basmajian and C. J. De Luca, Chapter1: introduction,, Muscles Alive their Funct. Reveal. by Electromyogr., p.1–18, (1985).

[13] Triwiyanto, O. Wahyunggoro, H. A. Nugroho, and Herianto, An investigation into time domain features of surface electromyography to estimate the elbow joint angle,, Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 15, no. 3, p.448–458, (2017).

DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v15i3.2177

[14] A. Bhattacharya, A. Sarkar, and P. Basak, Time domain multi-feature extraction and classification of human hand movements using surface EMG,, 2017 4th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst. ICACCS 2017, p.1–5, (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/icaccs.2017.8014594

[15] P. Konrad, The ABC of EMG (A Practical Introduction to Kinesiological Electromyography),, Arizona, (2005).

[16] H.J. Hermens and B Freriks, SENIAM Project,, SENIAM Proj., p.1, (2017).

[17] T. Triwiyanto, O. Wahyunggoro, H. A. Nugroho, and H. Herianto, Muscle fatigue compensation of the electromyography signal for elbow joint angle estimation using adaptive feature,, Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 71, no. July, p.284–293, Oct. (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.07.026

[18] M. R., F. Sepulveda, and M. Colley, sEMG Techniques to Detect and Predict Localised Muscle Fatigue,, in EMG Methods for Evaluating Muscle and Nerve Function, InTech, (2012).

DOI: 10.5772/25678

[19] M. M. Lowery and M. J. O'Malley, Analysis and simulation of changes in EMG amplitude during high-level fatiguing contractions,, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 50, no. 9, p.1052–1062, (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2003.816078

[20] Triwiyanto, O. Wahyunggoro, H. A. Nugroho, and Herianto, Effect of window length on performance of the elbow-joint angle prediction based on electromyography,, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, vol. 853, p.012014.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/853/1/012014

[21] A. Salman, E. G. Allstot, A. Y. Chen, A. M. R. Dixon, D. Gangopadhyay, and D. J. Allstot, Compressive sampling of EMG bio-signals,, Proc. - IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., vol. 2500, p.2095–2098, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2011.5938011

[22] L. H. Smith, L. J. Hargrove, B. a. Lock, and T. a. Kuiken, Determining the optimal window length for pattern recognition-based myoelectric control: Balancing the competing effects of classification error and controller delay,, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 19, no. 2, p.186–192, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2010.2100828

[23] M. M. Janković and D. B. Popović, An EMG system for studying motor control strategies and fatigue,, 10th Symp. Neural Netw. Appl. Electr. Eng. NEUREL-2010 - Proc., p.15–18, (2010).

[24] A. Gijsberts, M. Atzori, C. Castellini, H. Müller, and B. Caputo, Movement error rate for evaluation of machine learning methods for sEMG-based hand movement classification,, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 22, no. 4, p.735–744, (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2014.2303394

[25] MathWorks, What is Machine Learning?,, Mach. Learn. with MATLAB, p.12, (2016).

[26] A. U. Stata and H. M. Park, Comparing Group Means : The T-test and One-way,, Trust. indiana Univ., p.1–57, (2005).

[27] C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. Le, R. R. Motiwala, and S. C. Cramer, Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke,, Brain, vol. 131, no. 2, p.425–437, (2008).

DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm311