Surface Modification of Polydimethylsiloxane Using Low Pressure Chemical Vapour Deposition of Poly-Chloro-p-Xylene

Article Preview

Abstract:

The capability to understand and modulate accurately the self-assembly of the extracellular matrix (ECM) components still one of the major fundamental objectives in the field of liver tissue engineering. In the present study, we put in evidence the suitability of poly-chloro-p-xylene (Parylene-C, ParC) for modulating the self-assembly of ECM (type-I collagen) microenvironment and cellular topography of human hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) and Human umbilical vascular endothelial (HUVEC) cells while coated on a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substratum. Our findings demonstrated that the wettability of PDMS and ParC/PDMS were identical, while ParC/PDMS was significantly rougher than PDMS before and after collagen coating. However, the roughness and the wettability of ParC/PDMS were comparable to those of polystyrene (PS), a substratum commonly used for in vitro biological-related investigations. Type-I collagen adsorbed on ParC/PDMS and PS exhibited a dense network of microstructures around ~1 nm high and ~30-50 nm wide, whereas collagen adsorbed on PDMS had a low surface density of elongated fibrils that were ~2 nm thick and ~200 nm wide. This disparity in ECM microarchitecture leaded to distinct culture topographies of HepG2 cells (3D and 2D for PDMS and ParC/PDMS, respectively) and viability of HUVEC (2D viable HUVEC cells and non attached dead cells on ParC/PDMS and PDMS, respectively). To conclude, the observed changes in cell morphology and viability between ParC/PDMS and PDMS alone were directly related to the nature of the material which may impact the supramolecular organization of adsorbed ECM. We strongly believe that Low Pressure Chemical Vapour deposition (LPCVD) of ParC will offer promising insights into how microscale ECM modifications directly impact cell morphology and activity, leading to the development of advanced micro/nanosized tissue-engineered ParC/PDMS patterns with applications for liver tissue engineering.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

129-142

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nature Biotech. 23 (2005): 47-55.

DOI: 10.1038/nbt1055

Google Scholar

[2] Khetani SR, Bhatia SN. Engineering tissues for in vitro applications. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 17 (2006): 524-531.

Google Scholar

[3] Rosso F, Giordano A, Barbarisi M, Barbarisi A. From Cell-ECM Interactions to Tissue Engineering. J. Cell. Physiol. 199 (2004): 174-180.

DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10471

Google Scholar

[4] Peppas NA, Langer R. New challenges in biomaterials. Science 263 (1994): 1715-1720.

DOI: 10.1126/science.8134835

Google Scholar

[5] Langer R, Tirell DA. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 428 (2004): 487-492.

Google Scholar

[6] Folch A, Toner M. Microengineering of Cellular Interactions. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2: (2000) 227-256.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.227

Google Scholar

[7] Tzanakakis ES, Hansen LK, Hu WS. The role of actin filaments and microtubules in hepatocyte spheroid self-assembly. Cell. Motil. Cytoskeleton 48 (2001): 175-189.

DOI: 10.1002/1097-0169(200103)48:3<175::aid-cm1007>3.0.co;2-2

Google Scholar

[8] Berrier ALY, Kenneth M. Cell-Matrix Adhesion. J. Cell Physiol. 213 (2007): 565-573.

Google Scholar

[9] Pereira Rodrigues N, Poleni PE, Guimard D, Sakai Y, Arakawa T, Fujii T. Modulation of Hepatocarcinoma Cell Morphology and Activity by Parylene-C coating on PDMS. PloS ONE 5 (2010): e9667.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009667

Google Scholar

[10] Lee JH, Lee HB. A wettability gradient as a tool to study protein adsorption and cell adhesion on polymer surfaces. J. Biomater. Sci. (Polymer Ed. ) 4 (1993): 467-481.

DOI: 10.1163/156856293x00717

Google Scholar

[11] Harnett EM, Alderman J, Wood T. The surface energy of various biomaterials coated with adhesion molecules used in cell culture. Colloids Surf. B 55 (2007): 90-97.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.021

Google Scholar

[12] Pamula E, De Cupere V, Dufrêne YF, Rouxhet PG. Nanoscale organization of adsorbed collagen: Influence of substrate hydrophobicity and adsorption time. J. Colloid and Interface Sci. 271 (2004): 80-91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.11.012

Google Scholar

[13] Denis FA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, Gold J, Mustin C, Rouxhet PG, Dufrene YF. Protein adsorption on model surfaces with controlled nanotopography and chemistry. Langmuir 18 (2002): 819-828.

DOI: 10.1021/la011011o

Google Scholar

[14] Dupont-Gillain CC, Pamula E, Denis FA, De Cupere VM, Dufrêne YF, Rouxhet PG. Controlling the supramolecular organisation of adsorbed collagen layers. J Mater Sci Mater M 15 (2004): 347-353.

DOI: 10.1023/b:jmsm.0000021100.71256.29

Google Scholar

[15] McDaniel DP, Shaw GA, Elliott JT, Bhadriraju K, Meuse C, Chung K-H. The Stiffness of Collagen Fibrils Influences Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype. Biophys J 92 (2007): 1759-1769.

DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.089003

Google Scholar

[16] Sherratt MJ, Bax DV, Chaudhry SS, Chaudhry SS, Hodson N, Lu JR, Saravanapavan P, Kielty CM. Substrate chemistry influences the morphology and biological function of adsorbed extracellular matrix assemblies. Biomaterials 26 (2005): 7192-7206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.010

Google Scholar

[17] Pirone DM, Chen CS. Strategies for Engineering the Adhesive Microenvironment. J. Mamm. Gl. Biol. Neoplasia 9 (2004): 405-417.

Google Scholar

[18] Rhaghavan S, Chen CS. Micropatterned Environments in Cell Biology. Adv. Mater. 16 (2004): 1303-1313.

Google Scholar

[19] Rosenthal A, Macdonald A, Voldman J. Cell patterning chip for controlling the stem cell microenvironment. Biomaterials 28: (2007) 3208-3216.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.023

Google Scholar

[20] Khetani SR, Bhatia SN. Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development. Nature Biotechnol. 26 (2008): 120-126.

DOI: 10.1038/nbt1361

Google Scholar

[21] Whitesides GM, Ostuni ES, Takayama S, Jiang X, Ingber DE. Soft Lithography in Biology and Biochemistry. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3 (2001): 335-373.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.335

Google Scholar

[22] Loeb GE, Walker AE, Uematsu S, Konigsmark BW. Histological reaction to various conductive and dielectric films chronically implanted in the subdural space. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 11 (1977): 195-210.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820110206

Google Scholar

[23] Schwarz JA, Contescu CI, Putyera K. Dekker encyclopedia of nanoscience and nanotechnology. CRC Press (2004).

Google Scholar

[24] Chang TY, Yadav VG, Leo SD, Mohedas A, Rajalingam B. Cell and protein compatibility of parylene-C surfaces. Langmuir 23 (2007): 11718-11725.

DOI: 10.1021/la7017049

Google Scholar

[25] Dufrêne YF, Marchal TG, Rouxhet PG. Influence of substratum surface properties on the organization of adsorbed collagen films: in situ characterization by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 15 (1999): 2871-2878.

DOI: 10.1021/la981066z

Google Scholar

[26] Elliott JT, Woodward JT, Umarji A, Mei Y, Tona A. The effect of surface chemistry on the formation of thin films of native fibrillar collagen. Biomaterials 28 (2007): 576-585.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.023

Google Scholar

[27] Lazarevich NL, Cheremnova OA, Varga EV, Ovcinnikov DA, Kudrjavtseva EI, Morozova OV, Fleishman DI, Engelhandt NV, Duncan SA. Progression of HCC in mice is associated with a downregulation in the expression of hepatocyte nuclear factors. Hepatology 39 (2004).

DOI: 10.1002/hep.20155

Google Scholar

[28] Powers MJ, Griffith-Cima L. Motility behavior of hepatocytes on extracellular matrix substrata during aggregation. Biotech. Bioeng. 50 (1996): 392-403.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19960520)50:4<392::aid-bit6>3.0.co;2-g

Google Scholar

[29] Amstrong PB. Cell Sorting Out: The Self-Assembly of Tissues In Vitro. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 24 (1989): 119-149.

Google Scholar

[30] Powers MJ, Rodriguez RE, Griffith LG. Cell-substratum adhesion strength as a determinant of hepatocyte aggregate morphology. Biotech. Bioeng. 53 (1997): 415-426.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19970220)53:4<415::aid-bit10>3.0.co;2-f

Google Scholar

[31] Song G, Ohashi T, Sakamoto N, Sato M. Adhesive force of Human Hepatoma (HepG2) cells to Endothelial Cells and Expression of E-Selectin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3 (2006): 61-68.

Google Scholar

[32] Mayoral R, Fernandez-Martinez A, Bosca L, Martin-Sanz P. Prostaglandin E2 promotes migration and adhesion in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 26 (2005): 753-761.

DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi022

Google Scholar

[33] Konopka G, Tekiela J, Iverson M, Wells C, Duncan SA. Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A Is Critical for the Formation of Pseudocanaliculi and Modulates E-cadherin Expression in Hepatic Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (2007): 28137-28148.

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m703592200

Google Scholar

[34] Ho C-T, Lin R-Z, Wen W-Y, Chang H-Y, Liu C-H. Rapid heterogenous liver-cell on chip patterning via the enfanced field-induced dielectrophoresis trap. Lab-on-a-Chip 6 (2006): 724-734.

DOI: 10.1039/b602036d

Google Scholar