Hydrophobic Zinc Oxide Nanocomposites for Consolidation and Protection of Quartzite Sculptures: A Case Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

Quartzite sculptures are considered some of the most impressive and informative archaeological remains which have been found in the most of Egyptian archaeological sites. Regrettably, quartzite sculptures suffer from many deterioration aspects such as granular disintegration, scaling, cracking, efflorescence, soiling, microbiological colonization. Water is the main aggressive deterioration factor of stones and stone-based monuments, as in addition to its direct role in deterioration mechanisms, it plays as a catalyst in the physicochemical and microbiological deterioration processes.During the last two decades, polymer nanocomposites have widely been applied in the field of cultural heritage conservation due to their unique physical and chemical characteristics. Zinc oxide nanoparticles are among the most important semiconductive nanomaterials that have been applied in the fabrication of nanocomposites. They have been demonstrated to improve the physicochemical and mechanical properties of polymers. In addition, zinc oxide nanoparticles were mixed with polymers in order to fabricate superhydrophobic and self-cleaning protective materials.The aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency of zinc oxide nanocomposites, in order to select the best of them for the consolidation and protection of a colossal quartzite statue of Ramesses II. The properties of the treated quartzite samples were comparatively examined by colourimetric measurements, static water contact angle, compressive strength, and scanning electron microscope.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

64-75

Citation:

Online since:

June 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] El-Fakharany, F. A., The pioneer in the art of archaeological excavations, Garyounis University Publications, Second Edition, Benghazi, (1993).

Google Scholar

[2] Wicander, R., and Monroe, J. S., Essentials of physical geology, Cengage Learning, Fifth Edition, Canada, (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] Winkler, E. M., Stone: Properties, Durability in Man's Environment, Springer-Verlag Wien, (1973).

Google Scholar

[4] Lucas, A., Ancient Egyptian materials and industries, Kessinger Publishing, Third Edition, (2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Aston, B. G., Harrell, J. A., Shaw, I., Stone, in Ancient Egyptian materials and technology (Paul T. Nicholson and Ian Shaw, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2000), 177–194.

DOI: 10.1163/182539100x00795

Google Scholar

[6] Abd El-Hady, M. M., Scientific studies in the restoration and conservation of inorganic monuments, Zahraa El-Shark publishing, Second Edition, Cairo, (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] * * *, Admistration of Technical Support, The Archaeological Site of Panehsy Tomb, Ministry of Antiquites, Egypt.

Google Scholar

[8] Amoroso, G., and Fassina, V., Stone decay and conservation, Atmospheric Pollution, Cleaning, Consolidation and Protection, Elsevier, New York, (1983), 95-100.

DOI: 10.2307/1506020

Google Scholar

[9] Weaver, M. E., Acid Rain and air pollution vs. the building and outdoor sculptures of Montreal, Association for Preservation Technology, 23(4), (1991), 13 -19.

Google Scholar

[10] Petuskey, W.T., Richardson, D.A., Dolske, D.A., Aspects of the deterioration of Sandstone masonry in Anasazi dwelling ruins at Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado, USA, The Science of the Total Environment, 167, (1995), 145 -159.

DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04576-m

Google Scholar

[11] Warscheid, Th., and Braams, J., Biodeterioration of stone: a review, International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 46, (2000), 343-368.

DOI: 10.1016/s0964-8305(00)00109-8

Google Scholar

[12] Fitzner, B., Heinrichs, K., La Bouchardiere, D., Weathering damage on Pharaonic sandstone monuments in Luxor-Egypt, Building and Environment, Vol. 38, (2003), 1089 - 1103.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00086-6

Google Scholar

[13] Turkington, A.V., Martin, A., Viles, H.A., Smith, B.J., Surface change and decay of sandstone samples exposed to a polluted urban atmosphere over a six-year period: Belfast, Northern Ireland, Building and Environment, 38, (2003), 1205 – 1216.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(03)00077-5

Google Scholar

[14] Hosono, T., Uchida, E., Suda, C., Ueno, A., Nakagawa, T., Salt weathering of sandstone at the Angkor monuments, Cambodia: Identification of the origins of salts using sulfur and strontium isotopes, Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, (2006), 1541–1551.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.01.018

Google Scholar

[15] Jain, A., Bhadauria, S., Kumar, V., Chauhan, R., Biodeterioration of sandstone under the influence of different humidity levels in laboratory conditions, Building and Environment, 44, (2009), 1276-1248.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.09.019

Google Scholar

[16] El-Gohary, M., Effective Roles of some deterioration agents affecting Edfu royal birth house Mammisi,, International Journal of Conservation Science, 6 (3), (2015), 349-368.

Google Scholar

[17] Gulzar, S., Chaudhry, M. N., Burg, J. P., Saeed, S.A., Mughal sandstone heritage of Lahore: Formulating the future restoration strategy, International Journal of Conservation Science, 6 (2), (2015), 177-188.

Google Scholar

[18] Price, C.A., Doehne, E., Stone conservation: An Overview of current research, The Getty Conservation Institute, C.A. Price, USA, (1996).

Google Scholar

[19] Torraca, G., Lectures on materials science for architectural conservation, The Getty Conservation Institute, U.S.A, (2009).

Google Scholar

[20] Tsakalof, A., Manoudis, P., Karapanagiotis, I., Chryssoulakis, I., Panayiotou, C., Assessment of synthetic polymeric coatings for the protection and preservation of stone monuments, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 8, (2007), 69-72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2006.06.007

Google Scholar

[21] D,arienzo, L., Scarfato, P., Incarnato, L., New polymeric nanocomposites for improving the protective and consolidating efficiency of tuff stone, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 9, (2008), 253 - 260.

DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.03.002

Google Scholar

[22] Mosquera, M. J., and De los Santos, D. M., New water-repellent nanomaterial for protecting and consolidating stone, 11th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Torun, (2008).

Google Scholar

[23] Manoudis, P., Karapanagiotis, I., Tsakalof, A., Zuburtikudis, I., Kolinkeová, B., and Panayiotou, C., Surface properties of superhydrophobic coatings for stone protection, Journal of Nano Research, 8, (2009), 23-33.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jnanor.8.23

Google Scholar

[24] Manoudis, P., Tsakalof, A., Karapanagiotis, I., Zuburtikudis, I., Panayiotou, C., Fabrication of superhydrophbic surfaces for enhanced stone protection, Journal of Surface & Coatings Technology, 203, (2009), 1322-1328.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.10.041

Google Scholar

[25] De Ferri, L., Lottici, P., Lorenzi, A., Montenero, A., Salvioli-Mariani, E., Study of Silica Nanoparticles–Polysiloxane Hydrophobic Treatments for Stone–based Monument Protection, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 12, (2011), 356-363.

DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2011.02.006

Google Scholar

[26] Kapridaki, C. and Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P., TiO2-SiO2-PDMS nano-composite hydrophobic coatings with self-cleaning properties for marble protection, Progress in Organic Coatings, 76, (2012), 400-410.

DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.10.006

Google Scholar

[27] Aslanidou, D., Karapanagiotis, I., and Panayiotou, C., Tuning the wetting properties of siloxane-nanoparticle coatings to induce superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity for stone protection, Materials and Design, 108, (2016), 736-744.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.014

Google Scholar

[28] Helmi, F. M, and Hefni, Y. K., Nanocomposites for the protection of granitic obelisks at Tanis, Egypt, Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 16 (2), (2016), 87-96.

Google Scholar

[29] Aslanidou, D., Karapanagiotis I., and Lampakis, D., Waterborne superhydrophobic and superoleophobic coatings for the protection of marble and sandstone, Materials, 11, (2018), 585.

DOI: 10.3390/ma11040585

Google Scholar

[30] Wang, B., Feng, J., Zhao, Y., Yu. T., Fabrication of novel superhydrophobic surfaces and water droplet bouncing behavior - Part 1: Stable ZnO–PDMS superhydrophobic surface with low hysteresis constructed using ZnO nanoparticles, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 24, (2010), 2693–2705.

DOI: 10.1163/016942410x508244

Google Scholar

[31] Chakradhara, R.P.S., Kumara, V. D., Raob, J.L., Basua, B. J., Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces based on ZnO–PDMS nanocomposite coatings and study of its wetting behaviour, Applied Surface Science 257, (2011), 8569– 8575.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.05.016

Google Scholar

[32] Helmi, F. M, and Hefni, Y. K., Using nanocomposites in the consolidation and protection of sandstone, International Journal of Conservation Science, Vol. 7, (2016), 29-40.

Google Scholar

[33] Kim, E. K., Won, J., Do, J., Kim, S. D., Kang, Y. S., Effects of silica nanoparticle and GPTMS addition on TEOS-based stone consolidants, Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10, (2009), 214–221.

DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.07.008

Google Scholar

[34] Schanda, J., Colorimetry, Wiley-Interscience John Wiley & Sons Inc., (2007), p.56.

Google Scholar

[35] * * *, Standard test methods for compressive strength of natural building stone, ASTM C 170, (1976).

Google Scholar

[36] Raza, M., Bhardwaj, V. R., Ahmed, H, A, M., Mondal, M, E, A., Khan, A., and Khan, M, Sh., Provenance and weathering history of Archaean Naharmagra quartzite of Aravalli craton, NW Indian shield: Petrographic and geochemical evidence, Geochemical Journal, Vol. 44, (2010), 331-345.

DOI: 10.2343/geochemj.1.0075

Google Scholar

[37] Helmi, F. M. and Hefni, Y. K., A simple method for measuring the static water contact angle for evaluation the hydrophobicity of the consolidating and protective materials, Proceedings of the First International Conference (Egypt And Mediterranean Countries Through Ages), Faculty of Archaeology, Cairo University, 3, (2014), 327-341.

Google Scholar

[38] Cassie, A. B. D., and Baxter, S. Wettability of porous Surfaces, Trans. Faraday, (1944), 546-551.

DOI: 10.1039/tf9444000546

Google Scholar

[39] Helmi, F. M, and Hefni, Y. K., Nanocomposites for the protection of granitic obelisks at Tanis, Egypt, Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 16 (2), (2016), 87-96.

Google Scholar

[40] Charola, A. E., Water-repellent treatments for building stones: A practical overview, APT Bulletin, 26, (1995), 10-17.

DOI: 10.2307/1504480

Google Scholar

[41] Guidette, V., Chiavarini, M., and Parrini, P., Polyfluorourethanes as stone protectives, in proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, (Rodrigues, J., Henriques, F., and Jeremias, eds), Portugal, (1992), 1279-1283.

Google Scholar