Dynamic Behaviour of Geopolymer Concrete with Varied Compositions and Equivalent Compressive Strengths

Abstract:

Previous studies have suggested that incorporating crumb rubber into concrete enhances impact resistance and energy absorption. However, these studies often overlook the associated reduction in compressive strength when crumb rubber replaces fine aggregates, leading to comparisons between concretes with different strengths. This study addresses this gap by investigating the dynamic behaviour of two geopolymer concrete mixes, G1-25R and G2-0R, both designed to achieve similar compressive strengths despite their differing compositions. Mix G1-25R includes 25% crumb rubber replacement of fine aggregates and a binder composed of 90% fly ash and 10% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), while Mix G2-0R has no crumb rubber and uses only fly ash as the binder. Dynamic performance was assessed using a drop tower setup across six testing configurations. Results indicate that both mixes exhibit comparable peak impact forces and energy absorption capacities, which is attributed primarily to their similar compressive strengths. Although G1-25R’s crumb rubber content enhances ductility in static compressive tests, this increased ductility does not significantly influence dynamic resistance when compared similar strength geopolymer concrete with no crumb rubber. These findings suggest that crumb rubber can be effectively recycled in geopolymer concrete, providing comparable impact resistance and energy absorption to traditional concrete.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 1007)
• Pages: 97-102
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-SuV34r
• Online since: March 2025
• Authors: Mohamed Aown*, Safat Al-Deen
• Keywords: Crumb Rubber, Dynamic Behaviour, Geopolymer Concrete

References

[1] Das, S., et al., Geopolymer concrete: Sustainable green concrete for reduced greenhouse gas emission–A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022. 60: pp.62-71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.588

[2] Part, W.K., M. Ramli, and C.B. Cheah, An overview on the influence of various factors on the properties of geopolymer concrete derived from industrial by-products. Construction and Building Materials, 2015. 77: pp.370-395.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.065

[3] Al-Tayeb, M.M., et al., Effect of partial replacement of sand by fine crumb rubber on impact load behavior of concrete beam: experiment and nonlinear dynamic analysis. Materials and structures, 2013. 46: pp.1299-1307 DOI:.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9974-3

[4] Atahan, A.O. and A.Ö. Yücel, Crumb rubber in concrete: Static and dynamic evaluation. Construction and building materials, 2012. 36: pp.617-622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.conbuildmat.2012.04.068.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.068

[5] Gerges, N.N., C.A. Issa, and S.A. Fawaz, Rubber concrete: Mechanical and dynamical properties. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2018. 9: p. e00184.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2018.e00184

[6] Liu, F., et al., Dynamic mechanical behaviour of recycled crumb rubber concrete materials subjected to repeated impact. Materials Research Innovations, 2015. 19(sup8): p. S8-496-S8-501.

DOI: 10.1179/1432891715Z.0000000001733

[7] Najim, K.B. and M.R. Hall, Mechanical and dynamic properties of self-compacting crumb rubber modified concrete. Construction and building materials, 2012. 27(1): pp.521-530.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.013

[8] Pham, T.M., et al., Dynamic compressive properties of lightweight rubberized concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2020. 238: p.117705.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117705

[9] Shehata, N., et al., Geopolymer concrete as green building materials: Recent applications, sustainable development and circular economy potentials. Science of the Total Environment, 2022. 836: p.155577.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155577

[10] Almutairi, A.L., et al., Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2021. 15: p. e00733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm. 2021.e00733.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733

[11] Morsy, A.M., et al., Mechanical characteristics of GGBFS/FA-based geopolymer concrete and its environmental impact. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2022. 27(2): p.04022017.

DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000686

[12] Nath, P. and P.K. Sarker, Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Construction and Building materials, 2014. 66: pp.163-171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080

[13] Hossain, M.M., et al., Resistance of Concrete with Various Types of Coarse Aggregate to Coupled Effects of Thermal Shocks and Chemicals. Materials, 2024. 17(4): p.791.

DOI: 10.3390/ma17040791