Advanced XRD Profiling of Residual and Total Stresses in Penstock Pipelines for Enhanced Structural Integrity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Penstock pipelines in hydroelectric power plants are critical components whose structural integrity is paramount for reliable operation. However, they are subjected to severe operational conditions generating complex stresses, favoring low-cycle fatigue crack initiation, particularly at critical weld zones. This is exacerbated by anomalous operational cycles like repetitive emptying and filling. This study presents a comprehensive methodology combining X-ray Diffraction (XRD) with other Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques to assess residual stresses and their impact on pipeline integrity. XRD quantifies net stress under empty pipeline conditions, determining superposition between intrinsic residual stresses (manufacturing, welding, service-induced) and non-hydrostatic loads (self-weight, geomechanical forces). Diffraction pattern analysis yields crucial stress distribution data [1-5], identifying critical concentration zones prone to fatigue [6-10]. Complementary NDT techniques reveal morphological discontinuities influencing material mechanical behavior. Correlating XRD and morphological findings establishes cause-effect relationships between structural state and measured residual stresses. This integrated methodology offers significant predictive maintenance advantages, providing quantitative assessment of current pipeline state and projecting future performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

101-114

Citation:

Online since:

December 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.O. Ruud, "Residual Stress Measurements," Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, vol. 8. ASM International, p.0, 01-Jan-2000.

Google Scholar

[2] W. J. Sames, F. A. List, S. Pannala, R. R. Dehoff, and S. S. Babu, "The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing," International Materials Reviews. 2016.

DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649

Google Scholar

[3] P. Stanley, "Applications and potential of thermoelastic stress analysis," J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 64, no. 1, p.359–370, 1997.

Google Scholar

[4] ASME B31.1. (2024). Power Piping. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Google Scholar

[5] López-Paniagua, E., et al. "Non-destructive testing techniques for pipeline integrity assessment: A review." Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems, 2020, 3(1), 010801.

Google Scholar

[6] Schabowicz, K. "The application of ultrasonic and acoustic emission methods for assessment of concrete pipeline condition." Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 13(4), 509-516.

Google Scholar

[7] Fan, X., et al. "Development of a guided wave ultrasonic testing system for in-service pipeline inspection." Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 393, 195-207.

Google Scholar

[8] Rose, J. L. "Ultrasonic guided waves in quantitative NDE." Materials Evaluation, 1999, 57(3), 329-335.

Google Scholar

[9] Sun, P., et al. "Investigation on the defect detection capability of magnetic flux leakage for pipeline inspection." NDT & E International, 2011, 44(1), 101-108.

Google Scholar

[10] Cawley, P., & Lowe, M. J. S. "The application of guided waves in the NDE of pipelines." Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2003, 125(1), 101-109.

Google Scholar

[11] Wooh, S. C., & Daniel, I. M. "Characterization of defects in thick composites by ultrasonic inspection." Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1994, 116(4), 461-469.

Google Scholar

[12] Xiang, Y., et al. "Application of phased array ultrasonic testing in corrosion detection and sizing for pipeline inspection." NDT & E International, 2012, 45(1), 93-100.

Google Scholar

[13] Al-Mishari, M., et al. "Assessment of pipeline integrity using in-line inspection technologies." Engineering Failure Analysis, 2008, 15(7), 833-840.

Google Scholar

[14] Ma, X., & Deng, H. "Detection and classification of weld defects in steel pipes using radiographic testing and image processing." Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2018, 273, 203-211.

Google Scholar

[15] Xu, J., et al. "Evaluation of pipeline internal corrosion using high-resolution ultrasonic circumferential guided waves." Applied Acoustics, 2017, 126, 128-135.

Google Scholar

[16] Kundu, T. "Advanced Ultrasonic Methods for NDE of Structures." Encyclopedia of Smart Materials, 2002, 1-13.

Google Scholar

[17] Cegla, F. B., et al. "Electromagnetic acoustic transducers for high-temperature applications." Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2009, 51(8), 427-430.

Google Scholar

[18] Liu, R., et al. "Recent advances in non-destructive testing for composite materials: A review." Composite Structures, 2018, 201, 79-91.

Google Scholar

[19] Li, C., & Li, C. "Terahertz imaging for non-destructive evaluation of materials and structures: A review." Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2021, 145, 100627.

Google Scholar

[20] R. GuinebretieEre, X-ray diffraction by polycrystalline materials. 2007.

Google Scholar

[21] Prevey, P. S. "The role of residual stresses in fatigue." Materials Science and Technology, 1990, 6(11), 1163-1175.

Google Scholar

[22] Dowling, N. E. "Fatigue failure predictions for complicated stress-strain histories." Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1983, 105(3), 206-214.

Google Scholar

[23] Meguid, S. A., & Shagal, G. "The role of residual stresses in fatigue crack growth." International Journal of Fatigue, 2002, 24(1), 35-42.

Google Scholar

[24] Hertzberg, R. W., & Vinci, R. P. "Fatigue crack propagation in metals and alloys." Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2013, 563, 1-11.

Google Scholar

[25] J. D. Almer, J. B. Cohen, and B. Moran, "The effects of residual macrostresses and microstresses on fatigue crack initiation," Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00779-0

Google Scholar

[26] Cai, Y., et al. "A review of residual stress measurement techniques." Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2016, 32(6), 582-596

Google Scholar

[27] Prevey, P. S. "X-ray diffraction residual stress measurement techniques." Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1986, 17(8), 1405-1425.

Google Scholar

[28] Ruud, C. O. Measurement of residual stresses. In: Totten, G. E., Howes, M. A. H., Inoue, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel. ASM International, 2002, p.27–49.

Google Scholar

[29] Hill, M. R., & Noyan, I. C. "Residual stress measurement by diffraction using advanced analysis methods." Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2008, 485(1-2), 1-13

Google Scholar

[30] Schajer, G. S. "Application of finite element analysis to residual stress measurement." Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1988, 110(4), 378-385.

Google Scholar

[31] James, M. R., & Cohen, J. B. "Quantitative analysis of residual stresses by X-ray diffraction." Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, 1980, 19(A), 1-62.

Google Scholar

[32] O. Anderoglu, "Residual Stress Measurement Using X-Ray Diffraction," Texas A&M Univ., (2004)

Google Scholar

[33] F. A. Kandil, J. Lord, A. Fry, and P. V Grant, "A Review of Residual Stress Measurement Methods. Measurement of Residual Stress in Components," NPL Report, UK, Jan. 2002.

Google Scholar

[34] D. Delbergue, D. Texier, P. Bocher, R. Stresses, and X. E. Constant, "Comparison of Two X-Ray Residual Stress Measurement Methods: Sin2 ψ and Cos α, Through the Determination of a Martensitic Steel X-Ray Elastic Constant," Residual Stress. 2016, vol. 2, p.55–60, 2016.

DOI: 10.21741/9781945291173-10

Google Scholar

[35] J. Lu and S. for E. M. (U.S.), Handbook of measurement of residual stresses. Lilburn, GA; Upper Saddle River, NJ: Fairmont Press ; Distributed by Prentice Hall PTR, 1996.

Google Scholar

[36] G. P. Cherepanov, "Crack propagation in continuous media: PMM vol. 31, no. 3, 1967, p.476–488," J. Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 31, no. 3, p.503–512, 1967.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-8928(67)90034-2

Google Scholar