Design and Mechanical Evaluation of Ti-6Al-4V Reticular Structures for Biomedical Implants

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study explores the additive manufacturing of porous Ti-6Al-4V reticular structures using Powder Bed Fusion Laser Beam, with a focus on their morphological and mechanical properties for biomedical implant applications. Three triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) designs—diamond, primitive, and split-P—were fabricated with both constant and radial density gradients, and subjected to electropolishing and chemical etching to enhance surface quality. The results showed that split-P structures exhibited the highest yield strength (274.93–288.95 MPa) and a moderate Young’s modulus (7.16–7.76 GPa), making them strong candidates for load-bearing implants due to their mechanical behavior closely resembling that of trabecular bone. Diamond structures had the highest stiffness (6.95–8.65 GPa) but showed brittle behavior, while primitive structures presented the lowest modulus and strength, offering ductility suitable for flexible applications. The findings underscore the potential of optimized TPMS lattices to improve mechanical compatibility and reduce stress shielding in next-generation orthopedic implants.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

37-43

Citation:

Online since:

January 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Attarilar, M. Ebrahimi, F. Djavanroodi, Y. Fu, L. Wang, and J. Yang, "3D Printing Technologies in Metallic Implants: A Thematic Review on the Techniques and Procedures," Int. J. Bioprinting, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.

DOI: 10.18063/ijb.v7i1.306

Google Scholar

[2] OMS, "Trastornos musculoesqueléticos," Organización Mundial de la Salud. Organización Mundial de la Salud, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions

DOI: 10.33734/diagnostico.v57i2.86

Google Scholar

[3] N. Koju, S. Niraula, and B. Fotovvati, "Additively Manufactured Porous Ti6Al4V for Bone Implants: A Review," Metals (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 4, p.687, 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/met12040687

Google Scholar

[4] I. Yadroitsava, A. du Plessis, and I. Yadroitsev, Bone regeneration on implants of titanium alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion: A review. Elsevier Inc., 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815820-3.00016-2

Google Scholar

[5] A. Busch, A. Wegner, M. Haversath, and M. Jäger, "Bone Substitutes in Orthopaedic Surgery : Current Status and Future Perspectives," Z. Orthop. Unfall., vol. 159, p.304–313, 2020.

DOI: 10.1055/a-1073-8473

Google Scholar

[6] X. Lin et al., "Biocompatibility of Bespoke 3D-Printed Titanium Alloy Plates for Treating Acetabular Fractures," Biomed Res. Int., vol. 2018, 2018.

DOI: 10.1155/2018/2053486

Google Scholar

[7] J. Markhoff, J. Wieding, V. Weissmann, J. Pasold, A. Jonitz-Heincke, and R. Bader, "Influence of different three-dimensional open porous titanium scaffold designs on human osteoblasts behavior in static and dynamic cell investigations," Materials (Basel)., vol. 8, no. 8, p.5490–5507, 2015.

DOI: 10.3390/ma8085259

Google Scholar

[8] H. Chen, Q. Han, C. Wang, Y. Liu, B. Chen, and J. Wang, "Porous Scaffold Design for Additive Manufacturing in Orthopedics: A Review," Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 8, 2020.

DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00609

Google Scholar

[9] M. Araya-Calvo, A. Järvenpää, T. Rautio, J. E. Morales-Sanchez, and T. Guillen-Girón, "Comparative fatigue performance of as-built vs etched Ti64 in TPMS-gyroid and stochastic structures fabricated via PBF-LB for biomedical applications," Rapid Prototyp. J., vol. 30, no. 11, p.217–230, 2024.

DOI: 10.1108/rpj-04-2024-0152

Google Scholar

[10] Y. C. Wu et al., "Structural design and mechanical response of gradient porous Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by electron beam additive manufacturing," Mater. Des., vol. 158, p.256–265, 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.027

Google Scholar

[11] C. Nan Kuo, Y. P. Wang, and C. K. Chua, "Effect of electropolishing on mechanical property enhancement of Ti6Al4V porous materials fabricated by selective laser melting," Virtual Phys. Prototyp., vol. 17, no. 4, p.919–931, 2022.

DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2022.2090383

Google Scholar

[12] A. E. Medvedev, H. P. Ng, R. Lapovok, Y. Estrin, T. C. Lowe, and V. N. Anumalasetty, "Effect of bulk microstructure of commercially pure titanium on surface characteristics and fatigue properties after surface modification by sand blasting and acid-etching," J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 57, p.55–68, 2016.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.035

Google Scholar

[13] M. Araya et al., "In-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation of bio-inspired structures fabricated via PBF-LB for biomedical applications," Mater. Today Bio, vol. 31, p.101450, 2025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101450

Google Scholar

[14] R. Miralbes, D. Ranz, F. J. Pascual, D. Zouzias, and M. Maza, "Characterization of additively manufactured triply periodic minimal surface structures under compressive loading," Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 13, p.1841–1855, 2022.

DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1842948

Google Scholar

[15] Minimal Surfaces, "Schwarz P-Surface," Minimal Surfaces, 2018. https://minimalsurfaces.blog/home/repository/triply-periodic/schwarz-p-surface/

Google Scholar

[16] F. Claybrook, M. Mohammed, and D. Southee, "Investigation of additive manufactured Split P TPMS elastomeric structures for diabetic foot insoles," Trans. Addit. Manuf. Meets Med., vol. 4, no. 664, p.4, 2022.

Google Scholar

[17] N. Qiu, Y. Wan, Y. Shen, and J. Fang, "Experimental and numerical studies on mechanical properties of TPMS structures," Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 261, no. March 2023, p.108657, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108657

Google Scholar

[18] N. Letov and Y. F. Zhao, "A geometric modelling framework to support the design of heterogeneous lattice structures with non-linearly varying geometry," J. Comput. Des. Eng., vol. 9, no. 5, p.1565–1584, 2022

DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwac076

Google Scholar