Development and Characterization of 3D-Printed PETG Specimens Embedding Continuous Carbon Fiber Strain Sensors

Article Preview

Abstract:

Continuous monitoring of additively manufactured structures is essential for understanding their mechanical behavior and durability. This study investigates the electromechanical behavior of additively manufactured PETG specimens reinforced with continuous carbon fiber, with a particular focus on the influence of reinforcement geometry on strain-sensing performance. Specimens were fabricated using Fused Filament Fabrication and designed with four different reinforcement configurations: a reference single-layer layout, an extended-length reinforced region, a wider reinforced region, and a double-layer reinforcement. A total of twelve specimens were experimentally characterized. Electrical resistivity measurements were conducted under unloaded conditions and during bending induced by a low applied load of approximately 1.6 N. The initial electrical resistivity was found to depend on reinforcement geometry, with average values of approximately 523 Ω for the reference configuration, 888 Ω for the extended-length reinforcement, 1066 Ω for the wider reinforcement, and 285 Ω for the double-layer configuration. Under mechanical loading, the relative resistance variation remained below 0.6% for all specimens, indicating that the induced strain was very small. To further quantify strain sensitivity, the gauge factor was calculated for each configuration. Low average gauge factor values were obtained for the reference (K ≈ 0.1), extended-length (K ≈ 0.38), and wider (K ≈ 0.5) configurations. In contrast, the double-layer reinforcement exhibited a higher average gauge factor of approximately 2.24. These results indicate that reinforcement architecture affects the electromechanical sensitivity under low applied loads and offer insights for the design of multifunctional additively manufactured composite structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Pérez, D. Carou, E. M. Rubio, and R. Teti, "Current advances in additive manufacturing," in Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V., 2020, p.439–444.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.076

Google Scholar

[2] I. Ochana, F. Ducobu, L. Spitaels, M. K. Homrani, and A. Demarbaix, "Comparative accuracy analysis of continuous fiber composite printers: Coextrusion vs. dual-nozzle technology," in Materials Research Proceedings, Association of American Publishers, 2024, p.127–136.

DOI: 10.21741/9781644903131-14

Google Scholar

[3] H. Bikas, P. Stavropoulos, and G. Chryssolouris, "Additive manufacturing methods and modeling approaches: A critical review," International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 83, no. 1–4, p.389–405, Mar. 2016.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2

Google Scholar

[4] J. Justo, L. Távara, L. García-Guzmán, and F. París, "Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites," Compos Struct, vol. 185, p.537–548, Feb. 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052

Google Scholar

[5] B. Chang, X. Li, P. Parandoush, S. Ruan, C. Shen, and D. Lin, "Additive manufacturing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone with ultrahigh mechanical properties," Polym Test, vol. 88, Aug. 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106563

Google Scholar

[6] D. G. Bekas, Y. Hou, Y. Liu, and A. Panesar, "3D printing to enable multifunctionality in polymer-based composites: A review," Dec. 15, 2019, Elsevier Ltd.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107540

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Wang, C. Luan, G. Liao, X. Yao, and J. Fu, "Mechanical and self-monitoring behaviors of 3D printing smart continuous carbon fiber-thermoplastic lattice truss sandwich structure," Compos B Eng, vol. 176, Nov. 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107215

Google Scholar

[8] A. Demarbaix, I. Ochana, J. Levrie, I. Coutinho, S. S. Cunha, and M. Moonens, "Additively Manufactured Multifunctional Composite Parts with the Help of Coextrusion Continuous Carbon Fiber: Study of Feasibility to Print Self-Sensing without Doped Raw Material," Journal of Composites Science, vol. 7, no. 9, Sep. 2023.

DOI: 10.3390/jcs7090355

Google Scholar

[9] I. Ochana, F. Ducobu, M. K. Homrani, and A. Demarbaix, "Design of experiment on smart materials: tensile test on 3D printed composites reinforced with continuous carbon fiber and resistivity detection," in Materials Research Proceedings, Association of American Publishers, 2025, p.49–58.

DOI: 10.21741/9781644903599-6

Google Scholar

[10] I. U. Musa, R. A. Gomes, M. Sonego, and G. F. Gomes, "Advances in embedded sensor technologies for structural health monitoring of composite structures: a comprehensive review," 2025, Taylor and Francis Ltd.

DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2025.2581826

Google Scholar

[11] G. Liu, Y. Xiong, and L. Zhou, "Additive manufacturing of continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites: Design opportunities and novel applications," Oct. 01, 2021, Elsevier Ltd.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2021.100907

Google Scholar

[12] T. Shafighfard and M. Mieloszyk, "Experimental and numerical study of the additively manufactured carbon fibre reinforced polymers including fibre Bragg grating sensors," Compos Struct, vol. 299, Nov. 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116027

Google Scholar

[13] A. M. L. Lanzolla, F. Attivissimo, G. Percoco, M. A. Ragolia, G. Stano, and A. Di Nisio, "Additive Manufacturing for Sensors: Piezoresistive Strain Gauge with Temperature Compensation," Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 17, Sep. 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/app12178607

Google Scholar

[14] F. N. Chaudhry, S. I. Butt, A. Mubashar, A. Bin Naveed, S. H. Imran, and Z. Faping, "Effect of carbon fibre on reinforcement of thermoplastics using FDM and RSM," Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, vol. 35, no. 3, p.352–374, Mar. 2022.

DOI: 10.1177/0892705719886891

Google Scholar