Comparison in In Vitro Evaluation of Wollastonite and Dicalcium Silicate Coatings

Xuan Yong Liu; Chuan Xian Ding; Paul K. Chu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.288-289.359

Paper Titles

Glucosamine Coating for Inhibiting Bacterial Adhesion to Titanium Surfaces
p.343

Physico-Chemical Modifications and Biological Improvements of Biomedical PET as a Consequence of Excimer LASER Irradiation
p.347

Effect of Rare Earth Y₂O₃ Content on Microstructure of Gradient Bioceramic Composite Coating Produced by Wide-Band Laser Cladding
p.351

The Mechanical Behavior of Water Vapor-Treated HA Coating Produced by Plasma Spraying Technique
p.355

Comparison in In Vitro Evaluation of Wollastonite and Dicalcium Silicate Coatings
p.359

The Effect of Bovine Serum Albumin on the Crystalline Characteristics of the CaP Biomimetic Coating
p.363

Smooth Muscle Cell Ingrowth of a Surface-Modified ePTFE Vascular Graft
p.367

PEG-Containing Polymeric Films and Gels as Postoperative Tissue Adhesion Barriers
p.373

Preparation and Characterization of Collagen by Hydrogel Formation Method
p.377

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 288-289Comparison in In Vitro Evaluation of Wollastonite...

Comparison in In Vitro Evaluation of Wollastonite and Dicalcium Silicate Coatings

Abstract:

In-vitro evaluation of plasma sprayed wollastonite and dicalcium silicate coatings was carried out by SBF soaking test and osteoblasts seeding test. Apatite layers were formed on the surfaces of the two coatings indicative of the excellent bioactivity. The formation rate of apatite is higher on dicalcium silicate than on wollastonite. The cause is believed to be the presence of orthosilicate species in the dicalcium silicate coating promoting easier leaching by exchanging H3O+ ions from the solution with calcium ions concentrated in the orthosilicate positions. At the same time, loss of soluble silicon occurs, and it is supposed to enhance the repolymerization of the silica gel layer and provide the active sites for the nucleation of apatite. The outcome is that apatite forms faster on dicalcium silicate than on wollastonite. The data obtained from the osteoblasts seeding test indicate that the wollastonite and dicalcium silicate coatings promote the proliferation of osteoblasts and possess excellent biocompatibility.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 288-289)

Pages:

359-362

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.288-289.359

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2005

Authors:

Xuan Yong Liu, Chuan Xian Ding, Paul K. Chu

Keywords:

Bioactivity, Dicalcium Silicate, Plasma Sprayed, Wollastonite

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] L.L. Hench, R.J. Splinter, W.C. Allen, and T.K. Greenlee: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp. Vol. 2 (1971), p.117.

Google Scholar

[2] T. Kokubo, M. Shigematsu, Y. Nagashima, M. Tashiro, T. Nakamura, T. Yamamuro, and S. Higashi: Bull. Inst. Chem. Res. Kyoto Univ. Vol. 60 (1982), p.260.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Ono, T. Yamamuro, T, Nakamura, and T. Kokubo: Biomaterials Vol. 11 (1990), p.265.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Kokubo, S. Ito, M. Shigematsu, S. Sakka, and T. Yamamuro: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 22 (1987), p.4067.

Google Scholar

[5] T. Kokubo: J. Non-Cryst. Solids Vol. 120 (1990), p.138.

Google Scholar

[6] C. Ohtsuki, T. Kokubo, and T. Yamamuro: J. Non-Cryst. Solids Vol. 143 (1992), p.84.

Google Scholar

[7] X. Liu, and C. Ding: Biomaterials, Vol. 22 (2001) p. (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] X. Liu, and C. Ding: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 59 (2002), p.259.

Google Scholar

[9] X. Liu, S. Tao and C. Ding: Biomaterials Vol. 23 (2002), p.963.

Google Scholar

[10] J.M. Oliveira, R.N. Correia, and M.H. Fernandes: Biomaterials Vol. 23 (2002) p.371.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Hayakawa, K. Tsuru, C. Ohtsuki, and A. Osaka: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 82 (1999), p.2155.

Google Scholar