Fracture Assessment of Flaws in Weldments using FITNET FFS Procedure: An Overview

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recently a European community funded thematic network project (participation of 17 countries) FITNET (www.eurofitnet.org) has completed a new and unified engineering assessment procedure (FITNET FFS Procedure) of flaws in metallic structures and welds. This newly developed procedure (under CEN Workshop Agreement WA22) provides assessment rules for flaws or damage due to fracture, fatigue, creep and corrosion to demonstrate the structural integrity of the component. This paper gives an overview of the FITNET Fitness-for-Service (FFS) Procedure and specifically presents the features and basic equations of the Fracture Module. It also presents two brief examples for the validation of the procedure using laser welded specimens.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 345-346)

Pages:

401-409

Citation:

Online since:

August 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R6: Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects, British Energy Generation Report R6, Revision 4, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] British Standard BS 7910: Guide on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures, (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] API 579, Recommended Practice for Fitness-For-Service, 1 st Edition March 2000, American Petroleum Institute.

Google Scholar

[4] ASME XI, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code: Rules for In-service Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components, Division 1, (1995).

DOI: 10.1115/1.859872.ch29

Google Scholar

[5] Japanese Welding Engineering Society, Standard WES2805-1997, Methods of Assessment for Defects in Fusion welded Joints with Respect to Brittle Fracture and Failure due to Fatigue Crack Growth, 1997 (see also WES-TR2808 Method for assessment of brittle fracture in steel weldments subject to cyclic and dynamic large straining).

Google Scholar

[6] SINTAP: Structural Integrity Assessment Procedures for European Industry', Brite-Euram Project No. BE95-1426, Contract No. BRPR-CT95-0024, Final Report, September (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Webster (Guest Editor), European Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure - SINTAP, Special Issue of the Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 67 (2000) 479, pp.481-668.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00070-9

Google Scholar

[8] Fitness for Service Guide, EXXON Chemical, (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] G. Sedlacek, Eurocode 3: Unified European Rules for the Design of Steel Structures, Welding in the World, vol. 39, No. 1, pp.8-15, (1997).

Google Scholar

[10] R5: Assessment Procedure for the High Temperature Response of Structures, British Energy Generation Report R5 Issue 3, (2003).

Google Scholar

[11] A16: Guide for Defect Assessment and Leak Before Break Analysis, CEA Report, DM25, SEMT/LISN/RT/01-043/A, (2001).

Google Scholar

[12] M. Bergman, B. Brickstad, L. Dahlberg, F. Nilsson and I. Sattari-Far: A Procedure for Safety Assessment of Components with Cracks - Handbook, SA/FoU Report, 91/01, AB Svensk Anläggningsprovning, Swedish Plant Inspection Ltd., December (1991).

Google Scholar

[13] V. Kumar, M.D. German and C.F. Shih: An Engineering Approach for Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis, General Electric Company, NP-1931, Research Project 1237-1, Topical Report, (1981).

Google Scholar

[14] Flaw Assessment in Pressure Equipment and Welded Structures, PD6493 to BS7910, Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Proceedings of Seminar, June 1999, London, Document No. I Mech E S640.

Google Scholar

[15] FITNET, European Fitness-for-Service Network, Proposal No. GTC1-2001-43049, Contract No. GIRT-CT-2001-05071, www. eurofitnet. org.

Google Scholar

[16] M Koçak, Fitness for Service Analysis of Structures using the FITNET Procedure: An Overview, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Fitness-for Service FITNET 2006, 17-19 May 2006, Amsterdam, GKSS Publication, (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/bf03266577

Google Scholar

[17] S Webster, Y Tkach, The Fracture Module of the FITNET FFS Procedure, Proc. of the Int. Conference on Fitness-for Service FITNET 2006, 17-19 May 2006, Amsterdam, GKSS Pub., (2007).

Google Scholar

[18] M Koçak, E. Seib and A Motarjemi, Treatments of Structural Welds using FITNET Fitness for Service Assessment Procedure, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Fitness-for Service FITNET 2006, 17-19 May 2006, Amsterdam, GKSS Pub., (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/bf03266578

Google Scholar

[19] K-H Schwalbe, M Koçak (Eds), Mis-matching of Welds, Proc. of the Int. Conf. Mis-Match `93, ESIS 17, London, Mechanical Engineering Publications, (1994).

Google Scholar

[20] K-H Schwalbe, M Koçak (Eds), Mis-matching of Interfaces and Welds, Proc. of the 2 nd Int. Conf. MisMatch `96, GKSS Pub., Geesthacht, Germany, (1997).

Google Scholar

[21] Kim Y-J, M. Koçak, RA. Ainsworth, U. Zerbst, SINTAP defect assessment procedure for strength mismatched structures", Special Issue of the Eng. Frac. Mech., 67 (2000) 479, pp.529-546.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00072-2

Google Scholar

[22] M Koçak, Motarjemi AK, Structural Integrity of Advanced Welded Structures, Keynote Lecture in IIW Int. Conf. on Advanced Processes and Technologies in Welding and Allied Processes, Copenhagen, Denmark, 24-25 June (2002).

Google Scholar

[23] AK Motarjemi, Koçak M, Segar R, Riekehr S, Prediction of fracture behaviour of 13%Cr stainless steel welds using SINTAP defect assessment procedure, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Supermartensitic Stainless Steel, SS2002, Oct. 3-4 2002, Belgian Welding Institute, Brussels.

DOI: 10.1115/pvp2003-2048

Google Scholar

[24] E Seib, M. Koçak, H. Assler (2004): Fracture assessment of welded aerospace Al-alloys using SINTAP route. DVM-Bericht 236, Feb. 17-18, Cologne/Germany.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03266444

Google Scholar

[25] E Seib, Koçak, M, H Assler, (2004): Structural integrity assessment of welded aerospace aluminium alloy using SINTAP route. MP Materialprüfung Jahrg. 46 (2004)11-12, pp.556-564.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03266444

Google Scholar

[26] E Seib, Koçak, M and Assler, H (2004): Fracture assessment of welded aerospace aluminium alloy using SINTAP route. Welding in the World, Vol. 48, no° 11/12, 2004 . 46 (2004)11-12, pp.2-8.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03266444

Google Scholar

[27] E Seib, Koçak, M, Assler, H and Pacchione (2005): Fracture assessment of laser beam welded aluminium panels. 11 th Int. Conf. on Fracture (ICF) 20-25 March 2005, Turin.

Google Scholar

[28] E Seib, Residual strength analysis of laser beam and friction stir welded aluminium panels for aerospace applications, PhD Thesis, 2005, University TUHH, Hamburg, Germany.

Google Scholar

[29] E Seib, V Uz, M Koçak, Fracture Analysis of Thin-Walled Laser Beam and Friction Stir Welded Alalloys using FITNET Procedure, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Fitness-for Service FITNET 2006, 17-19 May 2006, Amsterdam, GKSS Pub., (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/bf03266503

Google Scholar

[30] I Varfolomeyev, L. Hodulak, D. Siegele and M. Windisch Validation of the FITNET Analysis Procedures for the Assessment of ARIANE 5 Thin-Walled Components, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Fitness-for Service FITNET 2006, 17-19 May 2006, Amsterdam, GKSS Pub., (2007).

Google Scholar

[31] I Hadley, P Moore, Validation of Fracture Assessment Procedures Through Full-Scale Testing, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Fitness-for Service FITNET 2006, 17-19 May 2006, Amsterdam, GKSS Pub., (2007).

Google Scholar