Failure Assessment Diagrams for a Solid with a Crack or Notch under Uniaxial and Biaxial Loading

Yu.G. Matvienko; O.A. Priymak

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.345-346.417

Paper Titles

Soft Surface Layer of Age-Hardened Al-Zn Alloys and Its Effect on the Fatigue Strength
p.391

Two Methods for Determination of Fatigue Crack Propagation Limit Curves and their Application for Different Materials
p.395

Fracture Assessment of Flaws in Weldments using FITNET FFS Procedure: An Overview
p.401

Alignment and Combination Rules on Multiple Flaws in Fitness-for-Service Procedures
p.411

Failure Assessment Diagrams for a Solid with a Crack or Notch under Uniaxial and Biaxial Loading
p.417

Steel of Highest Fracture Energy
p.421

Influence of Plastic Anisotropy on Limit Load of Welded Joints with Cracks
p.425

Crack Propagation as a Free Boundary Problem
p.429

Dynamic Analysis of a Piezoelectric Material with an Impermeable Penny-Shaped Crack under Pure Torsional Wave
p.433

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 345-346Failure Assessment Diagrams for a Solid with a...

Failure Assessment Diagrams for a Solid with a Crack or Notch under Uniaxial and Biaxial Loading

Abstract:

The cohesive zone model and the local failure criterion in the form of the average stress limitation in the cohesive zone ahead of the crack/notch tip have been employed to describe the failure assessment diagram for solids with a crack or notch under uniaxial and biaxial loading. The local stress on the crack extension line has been described by the exact elastic Westergaard’s solution taking into account the stress parallel to the crack plane. The cohesive stress ahead of the crack or notch tip is treated according to von Mises yield criterion as a property of the material, the applied stress and the stress biaxial ratio. Effect of the biaxial ratio is discussed for plates with a crack and notch. The failure assessment curve for a plate with a crack shows no significant differentiation among the three loading cases for plane stress, whereas the biaxial assessment curves move outward from the uniaxial case for plane strain.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 345-346)

Pages:

417-420

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.345-346.417

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2007

Authors:

Yu.G. Matvienko, O.A. Priymak

Keywords:

Biaxial Loading, Crack, Failure Assessment Diagram, Notch

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] U. Zerbst, R.A. Ainsworth and K. -H. Schwalbe: Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping Vol. 77 (2000), p.855.

Google Scholar

[2] Q. Shao and D.M. Tan: Structural Safety Vol. 12 (1993), p.113.

Google Scholar

[3] W. -L. Huang and J. -Z. Tan: Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping Vol. 69 (1996), p.53.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. -J. Kim, K. -H. Chung, J. -S. Kim and Y. -J. Kim: Int. J. Fracture Vol. 130 (2004), p.803.

Google Scholar

[5] V.V. Novozhilov: J. App. Math. Mech. Vol. 33 (1969), p.201.

Google Scholar

[6] T.L. Anderson: Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton 1995).

Google Scholar

[7] Yu.G. Matvienko: Int. J. Fracture Vol. 124 (2003), p.107.

Google Scholar

[8] Yu.G. Matvienko: Int. J. Fracture Vol. 131 (2005), p.309.

Google Scholar

[9] Yu.G. Matvienko, in: Proc. 16 th European Conf. of Fracture Fracture of Nano and Engineering Materials and Structures, edited by E.E. Gdoutos, Springer (2006).

Google Scholar

[14] Q. Shao and D.M. Tan: Structural Safety Vol. 12 (1993), p.113.

Google Scholar