Effects of Non-Silanized and Silanized Glass Particles on the Physical Properties on Denture Base Materials

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of silanization of the glass on denture base materials and to evaluate different types of glasses. A total of 136 Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (Palapress – Heraeus Kulzer) blocks were prepared in dimensions of 65mm x 10mm x 3mm. PMMA blocks were modified by different ratios of non-silanized and silanized Bioactive Glass Granules (BAG) (Vivoxid) and Inert Glass Granules (IG) (Vivoxid). The blocks were polished under water cooling and divided into 17 groups. (Group 1) No glass (control), (Group 2-5) 3-6-9-12% non-silanized BAG, (Group 6-9) 3-6-9-12% silanized BAG, (Group 10-13) 3-6-9-12% non-silanized IG, (Group 14-17) 3-6-9-12% silanized IG. The specimens were stored in distilled water and weighed (Mettler, Toledo) in days of 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 30, 45, 60. After water sorption test, the specimens were dried under 80°C and weighed in days of 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 for calculating the solubility values. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc comparisons (Dunnett T3, p<0.05). Water sorption and solubility values were significantly affected by the type and silanizaion of the glass (p<0.05). The highest water sorption value was observed in 12% silanized IG group (1,83±0,04%), whereas the lowest sorption values were recorded with 12% non-silanized BAG group (1,21±0,07%). Contrarily, The highest solubility value was observed in 12% non-silanized BAG group (0,98±0,03%), whereas the lowest solubility values were recorded with 12% non-silanized BAG group (0,34±0,03%). Water sorption and solubility values were affected by the type and silanization of the glass. Silanization improved the physical properties of the glass as well as the properties of the denture base material.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 493-494)
• Pages: 96-101
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.96
• Online since: October 2011
• Authors: O. Oral, L.V.J. Lassila, O. Kumbuloglu, A. User, Pekka Vallitu
• Keywords: Bioactive Glass, Inert Glass, Silanization, Solubility, Water Sorption

References

[1] W.J. O'Brien, Dental Materials and Their Selection, second ed., Michigan, (1997).

[2] R.G. Craig, M.L. Ward, Restorative Dental Materials, tenth ed., St. Louis, (1996).

[3] I. Hayakawa, N. Akiba, E. Keh, Y. Kasuga, Physical properties of a new denture lining material containing a fluoroalkyl methacrylate polymer, J. Prosthet. Dent. 96 (2006) 53-58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.012

[4] H. Nikawa, H. Iwanaga, T. Hamada, S. Yuhta, Effect of denture cleansers on direct soft denture lining materials, J. Prosthet. Dent. 72 (1994) 657-662.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90300-x

[5] S. Calikkocaoglu, Dishekimliğinde Maddeler Bilgisi (Metal Olmayan Maddeler), Istanbul, (2000).

[6] L.L. Hench, O.H. Andersson, G.P. LaTorre, The kinetics of bioactive ceramics part III: surface reactions for bioactive glasses compared with an inactive glass, Bioceramics. 4 (1991) 155-161.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-0269-3.50025-6

[7] C. Zhang, In vitro Characterization of Bioactive Glass, PhD thesis, Finland, (2008).

[8] O. Andersson, The Bioactivity of Silicate Glass, PhD thesis, Finland, (1990).

[9] I.E. Ruyter, Physical and chemical aspects related to substances released from polymer materials in an aqueous environment, Advanced Dental Research, 9 (1995) 344.

DOI: 10.1177/08959374950090040101

[10] A.M. Vuorinen, S.R. Dyer, L.V. Lassila, P.K. Vallittu, Effect of rigid rod polymer filler on mechanical properties of poly-methyl methacrylate denture base material, Dent. Mater. 24 (2008) 708-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.07.003

[11] A. El-Hadary, J.L. Drummond, Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials, J. Prosthet. Dent. 83 (2000) 356-61.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70140-5

[12] A.L. Machado Cucci, C.E. Vergani, E.T. Giampaolo, M.C. Silveira Ferreira Afonso, Water sorption, solubility, and bond strength of two autopolymerizing acrylic resins and one heat-polymerizing acrylic resin, J. Prosthet. Dent. 80 (1998) 434-438.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70008-3

[13] V.A. Koleganova, S.M. Bernier, S.J. Dixon, A.S. Rizkalla, Bioactive glass/polymer composite materials with mechanical properties matching those of cortical bone. 77 (2006) 572-9.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30561

[14] T. Arima, H. Murata, T. Hamada, Analysis of composition and structure of hard autopolymerizing reline resins, J. Oral Reh. 23 (1996) 346-352.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00863.x

[15] H. Yli-Urpo, L.V. Lassila, T. Närhi, P.K. Vallittu, Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass, Dent. Mater. 21(2005) 201-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.006

[16] S. Shinzato, M. Kobayashi, W.F. Mousa, M. Kamimura, M. Neo, Y. Kitamura, T. Kokubo, T. Nakamura, Bioactive polymethyl methacrylate-based bone cement: comparison of glass beads, apatite- and wollastonite-containing glass-ceramic, and hydroxyapatite fillers on mechanical and biological properties, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 (2000).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200008)51:2<258::aid-jbm15>3.0.co;2-s

[17] Park J., Bioceramics Properties, Characterizations, and Applications, Iowa, (2008).

[18] W.F. Mousa, M. Kobayashi, Y. Kitamura, I.A. Zeineldin, T. Nakamura, Effect of silane treatment and different resin compositions on biological properties of bioactive bone cement containing apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic powder, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 47 (1999).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19991205)47:3<336::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-o