Development of a Size Effect Law for RC Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The work presented is a part of the french ANR (Agence Nationale pour la Recherche) project MACENA (Maitrise du Confinement en Accident), its main objective is to better present the role of concrete heterogeneities in RC structures in the cracking process. This paper aims to develop and use the size effect method (WL2) applicable to RC structures proposed by Sellier and Millard 2014 [1]. The originality of the method lies on introducing a weighting function defined in the direction of the maximum principal stress using a scale length. In this work, an inverse analysis of the method allows to identify this scale length using experimental test series of concrete specimens under tensile load and 3 point bending beams. The approach is then applied to predict the sensitivity of the mechanical behavior of a reinforced concrete tie under tensile load. The method is applied in the elastic phase and allows providing the structural tensile strength corresponding to the first crack which is affected by size effect and plays a key role because cracked and uncracked structures behave in severe environment in a very different way. In FE model, correlated random fields on the tensile strength of the concrete can be generated using the identified scale length to characterize the autocorrelation length.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

892-899

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Sellier and A. Millard, Weakest link and localization WL2: a method to conciliate probabilistic and energetic scale effects in numerical models, European journal of environmental and civil engineering (2014).

DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2014.906368

Google Scholar

[2] G. Quinn, Weibull effective volumes and surfaces for cylindrical rods loaded in flexure, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 86.

Google Scholar

[3] 475-79 (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] R.J. Torrent, A general relation between tensile strength and specimen geometry for concrete-like materials, Matériaux et construction, 10(58), 1977, pp.187-196.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02478688

Google Scholar

[4] M. Van Vliet and J. Van Mier, Experimental investigation of size effect in concrete and sandstone under uniaxial tension, Engineering fracture mechanics 65 (2000), pp.165-188.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(99)00114-9

Google Scholar

[5] P. Rossi, and X. WU, Scale effect on concrete in tension, Materials and structures 27 (1994), pp.437-444.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Vořechovský Interplay of size effects in concrete specimens under tension studied via computational stochastic fracture mechanics, International journal of solids and structures 44 (2007), pp.2715-2731.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.08.019

Google Scholar

[7] W. Weibull, A statistical representation of fatigue failures in solids, Proc., Roy. Inst. of techn. 27.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Hoover and Z. Bažant, Universal size-shape effect law based on comprehensive concrete fracture tests, Journal of engineering mechanics 140 (2014), pp.473-479.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000627

Google Scholar

[9] C. Hoover, Z. Bažant, J. Vorel, R. Wendner and M. Hubler, Comprehensive concrete fracture tests: Description and results, Engineering fracture mechanics 114 (2013), pp.92-103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.08.007

Google Scholar

[10] X. Tang, Y. Zhou, C. Zhang and J. Shi, Study on the heterogeneity of concrete and its failure behavior using the equivalent probabilistic model, Journal of materials in civil engineering 2011; 23: 402-13.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000179

Google Scholar

[11] N. Arioglu, C. Girgin and E. Arioglu, Evaluation of Ratio between Splitting Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength for Concretes up to 120 MPa and its Application in strength Criterion, ACI Materials Journal-American Concrete Institute- Technical paper, (103-M03) (2006).

DOI: 10.14359/15123

Google Scholar

[12] P. Danzer, J. Supancic and T. Pascual, Fracture statistics of ceramics – Weibull statistics and deviations from Weibull statistics, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 74 (2007), p.2919–2932.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.028

Google Scholar

[13] J.L. Clément, Interface acier-béton et comportement des structures en béton armé - Caractérisation – Modélisation', Thèse de doctorat de l, université Paris VI, (1987).

DOI: 10.51257/a-v1-c2319

Google Scholar

[14] CEA, Description of the finite element code Cast3m (2015). http: /www-cast3m. cea. fr.

Google Scholar

[15] Eurocode 2, Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings, ENV 1992-1-1, (1991).

Google Scholar

[16] J. Mazars, S. Grange and H. François, A new 3D damage model for concrete under monotonic, cyclic and dynamic loading, Materials and structures ISSN 1359-5997.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0439-8

Google Scholar