The Properties of Historical Wrought Iron Tie Rods

Article Preview

Abstract:

The preservation of brick masonry buildings and historically significant buildings is a very hot topic today. A problem that often occurs during reconstruction and modernization is an optimal solution between price and efficiency. First of all, it is necessary to view the object as a complex system, when it is necessary to ensure its spatial rigidity. Planning and progress of reconstruction is then derived from the correct assessment of the building. The spatial rigidity of buildings in the past was also ensured by means of reinforcing elements. For masonry buildings, wall and beamed ties have been used for this purpose until the end of the 19th century. Since these wrought ties are made of a completely different material so-called wrought iron, its properties are different from the currently used materials. They differ in both tensile strength and other properties just because of other processing technology and manufacturing. At the time of the construction of the buildings it was not possible to provide a variety of length of the ties, so that ties have been joined by forged connections or adjustable wedge relations. The article deals with determining the tensile strength of wrought ties obtained by destructive methods. The results of the experiment may serve to predict the behaviour of ties from a similar period.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

207-212

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] De Bouw, M., I. Wouter S, J. Vereecken and L. Lauriks Iron and steel varieties in building industry between 1860 and 1914 – A complex and confusing situation resolved. Construction and Building Materials [online]. 2009, 23(8): 2775-2787 [cit. 2015-09-07]. DOI: 10. 1016/j. conbuildmat. 2009. 03. 009. Retrieved from: http: /linkinghub. elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/ S0950061809000890.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.03.009

Google Scholar

[2] ČSN 73 0038 (730038): Hodnocení a ověřování existujících konstrukcí - Doplňující ustanovení. 2014. Praha: Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví, (2014).

Google Scholar

[3] Technické podmínky 42. TP 42 - Opravy, obnovy a přestavby ocel. nosných konstrukcí mostů: Metody a technol. k zvýšení zatížitelnosti a prodloužení životnosti. Praha: Pontex spol. s. r. o., (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] Mccowan, C.N., T.A. Siewert, J.D. Mccolskey, K. Hildebrand and D.L. Olson N United States Capitol dome: Characterization of cast and wrought materials. Materials Characterization [online]. 2011, 62(8): 807-816 [cit. 2015-09-07]. DOI: 10. 1016/j. matchar. 2011. 05. 002. Retrieved from: http: /linkinghub. elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S1044580311001094.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.05.002

Google Scholar

[5] Gayle, M. a J. G. Waite. Metals in America's historic buildings: uses and preservation treatments. [2nd ed. ]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources, Preservation Assistance, 1992, v, 167 p.

Google Scholar

[6] Gordon, R. B. Process Deduced From Ironmaking Wastes and Artefacts. Journal of Archaeological Science [online]. 1997, 24(1): 9-18 [cit. 2015-09-07]. DOI: 10. 1006/jasc. 1995. 0092. Retrieved from: http: /linkinghub. elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0305440385700921.

DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1995.0092

Google Scholar

[7] D'aniello, M., F. Portioli, L. Fiorino a R. Landolfo Experimental investigation on shear behaviour of riveted connections in steel structures. Engineering Structures [online]. 2011, 33(2): 516-531 [cit. 2015-09-11]. DOI: 10. 1016/j. engstruct. 2010. 11. 010. Retrieved from: http: /linkinghub. elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S014102961000430X.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.010

Google Scholar

[8] Hlavní pravidla stavitelství: od Adolfa z Gabriely. Brno: Tisk a náklad Bušáka a Irrganga, 1861.

Google Scholar

[9] Jondl, J. P J.P. Jondlovo Poučení o stavitelstvím pozemním: Třetí rozmnožené a opravené vydání. 3. Praha: I. L. Kober, 1874.

Google Scholar

[10] ČSN ISO 13822: Zásady navrhování konstrukcí - Hodnocení existujících konstrukcí. Praha: Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví, (2015).

Google Scholar

[11] Maraveas, C., Y.C. Wang A T. Swailes Fire resistance of 19th century fireproof flooring systems: A sensitivity analysis. Construction and Building Materials [online]. 2014, 55: 69-81 [cit. 2015-09-11]. DOI: 10. 1016/j. conbuildmat. 2014. 01. 022. Retrieved from: http: /linkinghub. elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0950061814000464.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.022

Google Scholar

[12] Collette, Quentin, Stéphane Sire, William J. Vermes, Vernon J. Mesler and Ine Wouters. Experimental investigations on hot-driven structural rivets in historical French and Belgian wrought-iron structures (1880s–1890s). Construction and Building Materials [online]. 2014, 54: 258-269 [cit. 2015-09-11]. DOI: 10. 1016/j. conbuildmat. 2013. 12. 059. Retrieved from: http: /linkinghub. elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0950061813012166.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.059

Google Scholar

[13] Pipinato, A., C. Pellegrino, O.S. Bursi and C. Modena High-cycle fatigue behavior of riveted connections for railway metal bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research [online]. 2009, 65(12): 2167-2175 [cit. 2015-09-11]. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jcsr. 2009. 06. 019. Retrieved from: http: /linkinghub. elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S0143974X09001503.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.019

Google Scholar

[14] ČSN EN ISO 6892-1. Kovové materiály - Zkoušení tahem: Část 1: Zkušební metoda za pokojové teploty. Praha: Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví, (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] ČSN EN 1990: Eurokód: Zásady navrhování konstrukcí. Praha: Český normalizační institut, (2004).

Google Scholar