Performance Comparison between Polyurethane Foam and Cement Grouting Slab Replacement for Soft Ground Improvement at Shallow Depth Using Finite Element Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Two methods of ground improvement have been proposed to overcome excessive and differential settlement problem of soft ground foundation for infrastructure such as road, highway and parking space namely polyurethane (PU) foam and cement grouting slab. It has been executed by excavating and replacing the soft soil at shallow depth with the proposed ground improvement methods. The ground improvement methods able to minimise the excessive and differential settlement as the shallow depth of soft soil is removed and replaced by the stiff materials, thus the load can be distributed evenly to the underlying soil. The comparison of performance between both methods are evaluated in this study by carried out finite element analysis for soft ground problem namely PLAXIS. The results show that the settlement can be reduced significantly to the tolerable amount by applying PU foam instead of cement grouting slab as the increase in thickness of cement grouting slab cause the increase in settlement. On the other hand, the increase in PU foam thickness has not contributed to further settlement as the PU foam is lightweight, however, the soil may experience upward displacement due to insufficient overburden load to counter uplift.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1-8

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Indraratna, B. (2009). Ground improvement/grouting/dredging. In 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering, 3319-3329.

Google Scholar

[2] Vennapusa, P.K.R., Zhang, Y., & White, D.J. (2016). Comparison of Pavement Slab Stabilization Using Cementitious Grout and Injected Polyurethane Foam. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30 (6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000916.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000916

Google Scholar

[3] Chang, M., Chen, C.C., Huang, R.C., Chang, J., & Yang, P.J. Investigation on the mechanism of field low pressure grouting and the engineering characteristics of grouted soils.

Google Scholar

[4] Yahiro, T., & Yoshida, H. (1972). High-Velocity Jet Digging Method. Chemical Grout Company, Ltd.; Kajima Corporation, both of Tokyo, Japan.

Google Scholar

[5] Bell, A.L. (1993). Jet grouting. Ground Improvement (First Edition), Blackie, 149-174.

Google Scholar

[6] Saravut, J. (2003). Design concept of the soil improvement For road construcion on soft clay. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, (4), 311-322.

Google Scholar

[7] Biot, M.A. (1956). General solutions of the equations of elasticity and consolidation for porous material. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 23 (1), 91-96.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4011213

Google Scholar

[8] Biot, M.A. (1941). General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics, 12(2), 155-164.

Google Scholar

[9] Borges, J.L. (2004). Three-dimensional analysis of embankments on soft soils incorporating vertical drains by finite element method. Computers and Geotechnics, 31 (8), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.11.001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.11.001

Google Scholar

[10] Bowles, J.E. (2010). Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill, New York. GEO5, Theoretical Manual. http://www.finesoftware.eu/geotechnicalsoftware/help/fem/materials-models/.

Google Scholar

[11] Tavenas, F. (1981). Some aspects of clay behaviour and their consequences on modeling techniques. American Society for Testing and Materials, 740, 667-677.

Google Scholar

[12] Qian, J.H., & Yin, Z.Z. (1996). Geotechnical Principles and Calculation, Chinese Water Conservancy Hydroelectric lems. The Engineer.

Google Scholar

[13] Che Lat, D., Jais, I. B. M., Mohammed, K., Baharom, B., Samat, N., & Zainuddin, A. N. (2017). Evaluation of strength characteristics for palm kernel oil - based Polyurethane (PKO-P) as a ground improvement method. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 12(4), 126-129. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v12n4.517.

DOI: 10.11113/mjfas.v12n4.517

Google Scholar

[14] Lat, D.C., Jais, I.B.M., Mohamed, K.T., Razali, R. (2015). Performance comparison between polyurethane injection pile and slab system against lighweight concrete as a ground improvement using finite element analysis. Journal of Applied Science Research, 11(20), 11-16.

Google Scholar

[15] Basarir, H., Bin, H., Fourie, A., Karrech, A., & Elchalakani, M. (2018). An adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system to model the uniaxial compressive strength of cemented hydraulic backfill. Mining of Mineral Deposits, 12(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15407/mining12.02.001.

DOI: 10.15407/mining12.02.001

Google Scholar

[16] Samaiklang, W., & Fuenkajorn, K. (2013). Mechanical and hydraulic performance of cement grouts from 5 suppliers in Thailand. Rock Mechanics, Fuenkajorn & Phien-wej (eds), 333-342.

Google Scholar