Compressibility of Palm Kernel Oil-Based Polyurethane Foam Using Rowe Cell Apparatus for Ground Improvement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ground improvement methods are carried out to enhance the soil properties in order to ensure the unsuitable site locations with poor soil conditions can be developed for future development. Injection of lightweight material namely polyurethane foam is found to be one of the alternative methods that provide cost-effective and reliable techniques for ground improvement. Petroleum-based polyurethane is widely used in geotechnical application but nowadays the cost is getting more expensive due to high depleting rate and high production cost. Instead of using petroleum-based PU, this study is focusing on performance of palm kernel oil-based PU as an alternative method for ground improvement. The palm kernel oil-based polyurethane foam is anticipated to be more economical since it is produced from the renewable source, where it does not lead to permanent depletion of resources which has a limited global availability. The objective of this study is to determine the expansion and compressibility of palm kernel oil-based polyurethane with different mixing ratio. The samples were tested using Rowe cell apparatus to determine the compressibility, swelling index and pre-consolidation pressure of the polyurethane. The results of the finding show that the expansion and compressibility of the palm kernel oil-based polyurethane foam varies with the mixing ratio of isocyanate and polyol liquid. The compressibility index of PKO-BPU is found to be higher than petroleum-based polyurethane and low in expansion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

24-31

Citation:

Online since:

May 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yap, M. (2007). Tin Mining in Malaysia - Is There any Revival? 12-16.

Google Scholar

[2] Pourjavadi, A., Rezai, N., & Zohuriaan-M, M. J. (1998). A Renewable Polyurethane: Synthesis and Characterization of the Interpenetrating Networks (IPNs) From Cardanol Oil. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 68: 173-183.

Google Scholar

[3] Limpiti, T., & Potiyaraj, P. (2009). Mechanical property improvement of UPE resin from glycolyzed PET with commercial UPE resin. Journal of Metals, Materials and Mineral, 19(1): 45-51.

Google Scholar

[4] Ahmad, S., Siwayanan, P., & Wiese, D. (1998). Porim and INTERMED Sdn.Bhd. Malaysian Patent Application Number. PI9502302. Malaysia.

Google Scholar

[5] Badri, K. H. (2012). Biobased polyurethane from palm kernel oil-based polyol. In Polyurethane. InTech, 447-470.

DOI: 10.5772/47966

Google Scholar

[6] Berlin, A.A., & Zhitinkina, A.K. (1982). Foam Based on Reactive Oligomers, Polyurethane Foams. Howard Publishing Inc.

Google Scholar

[7] Wood, G. (1990). The Chemistry and Materials of PU Manufacture. The ICI Polyurethane Book, 41–42.

Google Scholar

[8] Premchitt, J., Ho, K.S., & Evans, N.C. (1995). Conventional and CRS Rowe Cell Consolidation Test on Some Hong Kong Clays.

Google Scholar

[9] Gofar N., & Sutejo Y. (2007). Long term compression behaviour of fibrous peat. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(2), 104-116.

Google Scholar

[10] Wong, L., Ali, F., & Hashim, R. (2008). Engineering behaviour of stabilized peat soil. European Journal of Scientific Research, 21(4), 581-591.

Google Scholar

[11] Duraisamy. Y., Huat. B., & Muniandy, R. (2009). Compressibility behaviour of fibrous peat reinforced with cement columns. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 27(5), 619-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9262-3.

DOI: 10.1007/s10706-009-9262-3

Google Scholar

[12] Huat. B., Kazemian. S., Prasad. A., & Barghchi, M. (2011). A study of the compressibility behaviour of peat stabilized by DMM: lab model and FE analysis. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(1), 196-204.

Google Scholar

[13] Mohamed, Jais, I.B., Md. Ali, M.A., & Muhamad, H. (2016). Polyurethane foam/resin for immediate solution to ground repair and modification. 19th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference & 2nd AGSSEA Congerence (19SEAGC & 2AGSSEA), 517-522.

Google Scholar

[14] Tengku Endut. T.N.D. (2013). Determination of Compressibility of Peat Soil Stabilised With Polyurethane. Shah Alam, Selangor.

Google Scholar

[15] Sidek, N., Mohamed, K., Jais, I. B. M., & Abu Bakar, I. A. (2015). Strength Characteristics Of Polyurethane (PU) With Modified Sand. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 773-774, 1508-1512. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.773-774.1508.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.773-774.1508

Google Scholar

[16] Sidek, N., Mohammed, K., Mohamed Jais, I. B., & Mazlee, M. F. (2015). Environment And Sustainable Technology Using Polyurethane Foam. In Annual Conference on Civil Engineering and Engineering. Phuket, Thailand.

Google Scholar