Paper Titles

Analysis of Side-Wall Wrinkling in Deep Drawing Processes
p.732

A Materials Science-Based Approach to Finite Element Simulation of Warm-Forming of Al-Mg-Zn Alloys
p.744

Numerical Study to Promote the Residual Stresses Development during ISF Process with Improvement in Two Point Incremental Die Forming
p.752

Influence of Macro-Structured Tools on the Formability of Aluminum Alloys in the Cryogenic Temperature Range
p.760

Numerical Modelling of Conventional and Incremental Forming of Thin-Walled Tube
p.768

Relevance of Symmetry Assumptions in the 3D Numerical Modeling of a Flowformability Test
p.776

Effects of Temperature on Deep Drawing of an Aluminum Alloy for Different Yield Criteria and Hardening Models
p.784

Analysis of the Possibility of Forming Stiffening Ribs in Litecor Metal-Plastic Composite Using the Single Point Incremental Forming Method
p.802

Prediction of Forming Forces for Incremental Micro-Forming Using Finite Element Analysis
p.815

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 926Numerical Modelling of Conventional and...

Numerical Modelling of Conventional and Incremental Forming of Thin-Walled Tube

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study presents a numerical analysis of the tube expansion process by conventional tube-end forming versus single point incremental forming (SPIF) using DEFORM. The work includes the assessment of the strain paths within the principal strain space of these processes with respect to the formability limits as well as their evaluation within the equivalent strain versus stress triaxiality space. The results obtained demonstrated that the mechanics of tube flaring process in conventional and incremental forming are substantially different. This analysis of formability in the light of the accumulated equivalent strain and the average stress triaxiality allowed a better understanding of the differences between both processes in terms of the fracture limit strains.

By email View Pdf

You have full access to the following eBook

Achievements and Trends in Material Forming

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 926)

Pages:

768-775

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-dp1242

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2022

Authors:

Carlos Suntaxi, Gabriel Centeno Báez*, Ana Rosa-Sainz, Domingo Morales-Palma, Carpoforo Vallellano

Keywords:

Failure, Formability, Fracture, Incremental Forming, Tube Forming

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Permissions:

Creative Commons CC BY 4.0

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. Centeno, M.B. Silva, L.M. Alves, C. Vallellano, P.A.F. Martins, Towards the characterization of fracture in thin-walled tube forming, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 119 (2016) 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.001

[2] J.P. Magrinho, G. Centeno, M.B. Silva, C. Vallellano, P.A.F. Martins, On the formability limits of thin-walled tube inversion using different die fillet radii, Thin-Walled Struct. 144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2019.106328.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106328

[3] J.P. Magrinho, M.B. Silva, G. Centeno, F. Moedas, C. Vallellano, P.A.F. Martins, On the determination of forming limits in thin-walled tubes, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 155 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.020

[4] J.P. Magrinho, M.B. Silva, P.A.F. Martins, On the Characterization of Fracture Loci in Thin-Walled Tube Forming, in: Form. Futur. Miner. Met. Mater. Ser., Springer, Cham, 2021: p.113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75381-8_9.

[5] T. McAnulty, J. Jeswiet, M. Doolan, Formability in single point incremental forming: A comparative analysis of the state of the art, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 16 (2017) 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.07.003.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.07.003

[6] X. Zhan, Z. Wang, M. Li, Q. Hu, J. Chen, Investigations on failure-to-fracture mechanism and prediction of forming limit for aluminum alloy incremental forming process, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 282 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116687.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116687

[7] J.A. López-Fernández, G. Centeno, A.J. Martínez-Donaire, D. Morales-Palma, C. Vallellano, Stretch-flanging of AA2024-T3 sheet by single-stage SPIF, Thin-Walled Struct. 160 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107338.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107338

[8] P. Eyckens, S. He, A. Van Bael, P. Van Houtte, J. Duflou, Forming limit predictions for the serrated strain paths in single point incremental sheet forming, AIP Conf. Proc. 908 (2007) 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2740802.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2740802

[9] M.J. Mirnia, M. Shamsari, Numerical prediction of failure in single point incremental forming using a phenomenological ductile fracture criterion, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 244 (2017) 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.029.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.029

[10] V. Vujovic, A.H. Shabaik, A new workability criterion for ductile metals, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME. 108 (1986) 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3225876.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3225876

[11] Y. Bao, T. Wierzbicki, On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 46 (2004) 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006

[12] C. Suntaxi, G. Centeno, M.B. Silva, C. Vallellano, P.A.F. Martins, Tube expansion by single point incremental forming: An experimental and numerical investigation, Metals (Basel). 11 (2021) 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11091481.

DOI: 10.3390/met11091481

[13] V.A. Cristino, J.P. Magrinho, G. Centeno, M.B. Silva, P.A.F. Martins, Theory of single point incremental forming of tubes, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 287 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116659.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116659

[14] M.B. Silva, K. Isik, A.E. Tekkaya, A.G. Atkins, P.A.F. Martins, Fracture toughness and failure limits in sheet metal forming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 234 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.03.029.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.03.029

[15] F.A. McClintock, A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes, J. Appl. Mech. 35 (1968) 363–371.

[16] A.G. Atkins, Fracture in forming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 56 (1996) 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(95)01875-1.

[17] A.J. Martínez-Donaire, M. Borrego, D. Morales-Palma, G. Centeno, C. Vallellano, Analysis of the influence of stress triaxiality on formability of hole-flanging by single-stage SPIF, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 151 (2019) 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.006