Effect of Termination Region on Unclamped Inductive Switching Failure for 4H-SiC VDMOS

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of the termination structure on the unclamped inductive switching (UIS) failure is analyzed for two kinds of SiC MOSFET, where S-MOS and G-MOS termination structure are adopted. The MOSFETs are named as S-MOS and G-MOS according to the buses connecting with different electrodes in the termination region. The experimental results indicate that the avalanche energy G-MOS can withstand is 1.15 times larger than that of S-MOS. To understand what are the factors that lead to different UIS capabilities, further static measurements and hotpot mapping after UIS test are done, and technology computer aided design (TCAD) simulation also is done to further confirm the principle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

89-94

Citation:

Online since:

May 2023

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Friedrichs, SiC Devices for Mainstream Adoption, 2018 IEEE IEDM, 2018: 19.1.1-19.1.4.

DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2018.8614625

Google Scholar

[2] Imaizumi, Masayuki, and Naruhisa Miura. Characteristics of 600, 1200, and 3300 V planar SiC-MOSFETs for energy conversion applications. IEEE Trans Electron Devices, 62.2 (2014) 390-395.

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2014.2358581

Google Scholar

[3] X. She, A.Q. Huang, O. Lucia, et al. Review of silicon carbide power devices and their applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64.10 (2017) 8193-8205.

DOI: 10.1109/tie.2017.2652401

Google Scholar

[4] T. McDonald, M. Soldano, et al. Power MOSFET avalanche design guidelines. International rectifier Application Note, AN-1005 (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Ng, J. Sin, et al. UIS analysis and characterization of the inverted L-shaped source trench power MOSFET." IEEE Trans Electron Devices 58.11 (2011) 3984-3990.

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2011.2164081

Google Scholar

[6] S.Y. Liu, et al. Repetitive unclamped-inductive-switching-induced electrical parameters degradations and simulation optimizations for 4H-SiC MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices. 63.11 (2016) 4331-4338.

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2016.2604253

Google Scholar

[7] N. Ren, et al. Investigation on single pulse avalanche failure of SiC MOSFET and Si IGBT. Solid State Electron. 152 (2019) 33-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2018.11.010

Google Scholar

[8] A. Castellazzi, et al. Transient out-of-SOA robustness of SiC power MOSFETs. 2017 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS). IEEE, 2017.

DOI: 10.1109/irps.2017.7936255

Google Scholar

[9] I.H. Ji, et al. Highly rugged 1200 v 80 mQ 4-H SiC power MOSFET. 2017 29th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and IC's (ISPSD). IEEE, 2017.

DOI: 10.23919/ispsd.2017.7988995

Google Scholar

[10] J. An, and S. Hu. Experimental and theoretical demonstration of temperature limitation for 4H-SiC MOSFET during unclamped inductive switching. IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics 8.1 (2019) 206-214.

DOI: 10.1109/jestpe.2019.2944167

Google Scholar

[11] S. Soneda, et al. Analysis of a drain-voltage oscillation of MOSFET under high dV/dt UIS condition. 2012 24th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs. IEEE, 2012.

DOI: 10.1109/ispsd.2012.6229046

Google Scholar

[12] K. Han and B.J. Baliga. Comprehensive physics of third quadrant characteristics for accumulation-and inversion-channel 1.2-kV 4H-SiC MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices. 66.9 (2019) 3916-3921.

DOI: 10.1109/ted.2019.2929733

Google Scholar

[13] R. Zhang, X. Lin, et al. Third quadrant conduction loss of 1.2–10 kV SiC MOSFETs: Impact of gate bias control. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 36.2 (2020) 2033-2043.

DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2020.3006075

Google Scholar