High-Temperature Reliability Analysis of 1200V/100A 4H-SiC Junction Barrier Schottky Diodes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The high-temperature (up to 200 °C) reliability analysis of 1200V/100A 4H-SiC JBS under 168 hours of high-temperature storage stress (HTSS), high-temperature reverse bias (HTRB) and high-humidity HTRB (H3TRB) stress test are reported. Results show that, all the statistical distribution of the data consistency is more dispersed after HTSS, HTRB and H3TRB test, which suggests that there are more degradation in the forward voltage and leakage current characteristics of JBS device under high temperature (up to 423K) stress. The increased reverse leakage currents after HTSS and HTRB stresses at different test temperatures are mainly due to the thermionic emission with the image force barrier height lowering. However, it is not the same phenomenon after HTRB stress. And the stability of VR under HTRB test is better than the one under HTSS test, which may be due to the migration and accumulation of charge during exposure to HTRB.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1004)

Pages:

1004-1009

Citation:

Online since:

July 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Roccaforte F, Giannazzo F and Raineri V 2010 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.43 223001 (2010) 256-572.

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/43/22/223001

Google Scholar

[2] Fanny Dahlquist, Junction Barrier Schottky Rectifiers in Silicon Carbide KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2002, pp.16-25.

Google Scholar

[3] Baliga, B.J, Silicon Carbide Power Devices World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, USA, 2005, pp.104-115.

Google Scholar

[4] Baliga, B.J, Fundamentals of Power Semiconductor Devices, Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 2008, pp.168-197.

Google Scholar

[5] Lin Zhu and T. Paul Chow, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 55(8).(2008) 1857-1863.

Google Scholar

[6] Yidan Tang, Xinyu Liu, Yun Bai, Shengxu Dong, Shaodong Xu, Mater. Sci. Forum, 924, (2018) 589-592.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Godignon, X. Jord`a, et al, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 58(7) (2011) 2582–2590.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Rabkowski, D. Peftitsis, and H.-P. Nee, IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag., vol. 6, no. 2, (2012) 17–26.

Google Scholar

[9] Yidan Tang, Lan Ge, Hang Gu, Yun Bai, Yafei Luo, Chengzhan Li, Xinyu Liu Microelectron. Reliab. 102 113451 (2019) 1-6.

Google Scholar

[10] Shuai Yang, et al, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 33(3), (2018) 1874-1877.

Google Scholar

[11] Hiroyuki Matsushima, et al, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 65(8), (2018) 3318-3325.

Google Scholar