Mono-Versus Poly-Crystalline SiC for Nuclear Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

3C-SiC layers of different microstructures (monocrystalline (100) and (111) oriented and polycrystalline) were implanted with high energy (800 keV) 129Xe++ ions. Implantations were performed at room temperature (RT) and at 500 °C using two different fluences of Φ1 = 1x1016 and Φ2 = 1x1017 at/cm2. Surface blistering was only observed for RT and Φ2 implantations into poly-SiC material while mono-SiC kept rather smooth surface. This was due to more homogeneous Xe bubbles distribution (200 nm deep) in the mono-SiC than in the poly-SiC. Xe retention was found to be almost complete for all samples. Some Xe enhanced diffusion was detected in the poly-SiC material which was attributed to grain boundaries. Some irradiation-induced oxidation effect was evidenced, O element being located at the depth where Xe bubbles are accumulating. This was more pronounced for poly than for mono-SiC. These results demonstrate that SiC microstructure affects many aspects of its behavior upon Xe irradiation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1004)

Pages:

139-144

Citation:

Online since:

July 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Zabiégo, C. Sauder, C. Lorette, P. Guédene, CEA patent, WO2013017621 A vol. 1, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] W.-J. Kim, D. Kim, J. Y. Park, Nucl. Engin. & Technol. vol. 45, no 4, (2013) 565-572.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Katoh, L. L. Snead, T. Cheng, C. Shih, W. D. Lewis, T. Koyanagi, T. Hinoki, C. H. Henager Jr, M. Ferraris, J. Nucl. Mater. 448 (2014) 497.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.002

Google Scholar

[4] G. M. Wright, M.G. Durett, K.W. Hoover, D.G. Whyte, L.A. Kesler et al., J. of Nucl. Mater., 458 (2015) 272.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Yamamoto, Y. Murakami, H. Yamaguchi, T. Yamamoto, D. Yonetsu, K. Noborio, S. Konishic, Fusion Engineering and Design 109–111 (2016) 1286–1290.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.12.041

Google Scholar

[6] J. Baillet, S. Gavarini, N. Millard-Pinard, et al., J Nuclear Materials 503 (2018) 140-150.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Jiang, J. Nicolaï, A. Declémy, E. Gilabert, M.-F. Beaufort, J.-F. Barbot, Nuclear Instr. & Methods in Phys. Res. B 374 (2016) 71–75.

Google Scholar

[8] L.L. Snead, T. Nozawa, Y. Katoh, T.S. Byun, J. Nuclear Mater. vol. 371, no 1-3, (2007) 329-377.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Jiang, A Declémy, M-F Beaufort, A Boulle, J-F Barbot, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1190 (2019) 012015.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1190/1/012015

Google Scholar

[10] T.T. Hlatshwayo, J.H. O'Connell, V.A Skuratov, M. Msimanga, R.J. Kuhudzai, E.G. Njoroge, J.B. Malherbe, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 (2015) 465306.

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/46/465306

Google Scholar

[11] A. Barcz, R. Jakieła, M. Kozubal, J. Dyczewski, G.K. Celler, Nucl. Instr. & Methods in Phys. Res. B 365 (2015) 146–149.

Google Scholar