Comparative Results of Low Temperature Annealing of Lightly Doped N-Layers of Silicon Carbide Irradiated by Protons and Electrons

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influence of low-temperature (up to 400°С) annealing on the current-voltage and capacitance–voltage characteristics of Schottky diodes irradiated with protons with an energy of 15 MeV compared with the results of annealing of structures after irradiation with electrons with an energy of 0.9 MeV has been studied. It was shown that in case of proton irradiation with a dose of 4E13 cm-2 and electron irradiation with a dose of 1E16 cm-2, only partial carrier compensation occurs and the differential resistance is completely determined by the number of carriers in the epitaxial layer. The irradiation method has almost no effect on the direct current dependence on the voltage in the exponential segment. The ideality coefficient remains almost unchanged within 1.03 ÷ 1.04. During annealing after proton irradiation, a large activation energy of the process is required. The temperature of the beginning of annealing process during proton irradiation shifts to a larger value, from 150 °C to 250 °C when compared with electron irradiation. It has been demonstrated that at low doses of proton irradiation, the low-temperature annealing leads to the return to the conduction band of up to 65% of the removed charge carriers. After electron irradiation, low-temperature annealing returns up to 90% of the removed charge carriers to the conduction band. This indicates that at room temperature both proton irradiation as well as electron irradiation introduce both stable and unstable defects but in different proportions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1004)

Pages:

231-236

Citation:

Online since:

July 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. A. Reshanov et al. Mater. Sci. Forum 645-648 (2010) 423-426.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Castaldini et al. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (2004) 3780-3782.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Alfieri et al. J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 043518.

Google Scholar

[4] V .V .Kozlovski et al. J. Appl. Phys. 117 (2015) 155702.

Google Scholar

[5] R. K. Sharma et al. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 62 (2015) 534-541.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Hazdra et al. Mater. Sci. Forum 897 (2017) 463-466.

Google Scholar

[7] V .V Kozlovski et al. J. Appl. Phys. 123 (2018) 024502.

Google Scholar

[8] A. A. Lebedev et al. Mater. Sci. Forum 924 (2018) 217-220.

Google Scholar

[9] D.V. Davydov et al. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 308-310 (2001) 641-644.

Google Scholar

[10] A.A. Lebedev et al. Semiconductors 34 (2000) 861-866.

Google Scholar

[11] V. V. Emtsev et al. Mater. Sci. Forum 258-263 (1997) 1143-1148.

Google Scholar

[12] J. W. Steeds et al. Mater. Sci. Forum 353 (2001) 381-384.

Google Scholar

[13] J. W. Steeds et al. Diamond and Related Mater. 11 (2002) 1923-1945.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Kaneko and T. Kimoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011. V. 98 (2011) 262106.

Google Scholar

[15] A. Castaldini et al. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 21 (2006) 724-728.

Google Scholar

[16] O. M. Korolkov et al. Semiconductors 53 (7) (2019) 975–978.

Google Scholar

[17] A.A. Lebedev, Radiation Effects in Silicon Carbide, Material Research Forum LLC, Millersville, PA 17551, USA, Volume 6, (2017).

Google Scholar

[18] V. Kozlovski, V. Abrosimova. Radiation Defect Engineering. Selected topics in electronics and systems - v.37, World Scientific, Singapore - New Jersey - London – Hong Kong, (2005).

Google Scholar

[19] G. Alfieri et al. J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 113524.

Google Scholar