The Waffle Substrate: A Novel Approach to Reducing Substrate Resistance in SiC Power Devices

Article Preview

Abstract:

Silicon carbide (SiC) is enabling the next generation of semiconductor power devices, with performance orders-of-magnitude beyond silicon. The most important power switching device is the SiC power MOSFET, whose performance is limited by three main resistance elements: the channel, drift layer, and substrate. For blocking voltages in the range of 400-900V, substrate resistance is a major limitation. Wafer thinning is currently used to reduce the substrate resistance, but this also reduces the strength of the wafers. We report on a waffle substrate technique that relies on wafer thinning and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching to reduce the substrate resistance below levels achievable by thinning alone, while retaining the mechanical stability of a moderately-thinned substrate. This technique can be applied to any SiC device for which substrate resistance is a limitation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1004)

Pages:

738-746

Citation:

Online since:

July 2020

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2020 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T. Kimoto, and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology: Growth, Character­ ization, Devices and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, (2014).

Google Scholar

[2] R. Rupp, R. Kern, and R. Gerlach, Laser backside contact annealing of SiC power devices: A prerequisite for SiC thin wafer technology, Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD). 25th International Symposium (2013) 51-54.

DOI: 10.1109/ispsd.2013.6694396

Google Scholar

[3] J.D. Wu, C.Y. Huang, and C.C. Liao, Fracture strength characterization and failure analysis of silicon dies, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 43, no. 2 (2003) 269-277.

DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2714(02)00314-1

Google Scholar

[4] J.A. Cooper Jr, US Patent 9,780,206. (2017)[5] R.S. Okojie, C.W. Chang, L.J. Evans, Reducing DRIE­induced trench effects in SiC pressure sensors using FEA prediction, IEEE Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Vo. 20, no. 5, (2011) 1174 -1183.

DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2011.2163298

Google Scholar

[6] J.­H. Zhao, J. Tellkamp, V. Gupta, and D.R. Edwards, Experimental evaluations of the strength of silicon die by 3­point­bend versus ball­on­ring tests, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing. vol. 32 no. 4 (2009) 248-255.

DOI: 10.1109/tepm.2009.2028329

Google Scholar

[7] L.E. Luna, M.J. Tadjer, T.J. Anderson, E.A. Imhoff, K.D. Hobart, and F.J. Kub, Dry Etching of High Aspect Ratio 4H­SiC Microstructures, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, vol. 6 no. 4 (2017) P207-P210.

DOI: 10.1149/2.0031705jss

Google Scholar

[8] S. Tanaka, K. Rajanna, T. Abe, and M. Esashi, Deep reactive ion etching of silicon carbide, Jour­ nal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena vol. 19 no. 4 (2001) 2173-2176.

DOI: 10.1116/1.1418401

Google Scholar

[9] N. Okamoto, Elimination of pillar associated with micropipe of SiC in high­rate inductively cou­ pled plasma etching, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films vol. 27 no. 2 (2009) 295-300.

DOI: 10.1116/1.3077297

Google Scholar

[10] M.S. So, S.­G. Lim, and T.N. Jackson, Fast, smooth, and anisotropic etching of SiC using SF6/Ar, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Pro­ cessing, Measurement, and Phenomena vo. 17 no. 2 (1999) 2055-2057.

DOI: 10.1116/1.590871

Google Scholar

[11] J. Biscarrat, J.F. Michaud, E. Collard, and D. Alquier, ICP etching of 4H­SiC substrates, Materials Science Forum, Trans Tech Publ, vol. 740 (2013) 825-828.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.740-742.825

Google Scholar

[12] G.M. Beheim, and L.J. Evans, Control of trenching and surface roughness in deep reactive ion etched 4H and 6H SiC, MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive, Cambridge University Press vol. 911 (2006).

DOI: 10.1557/proc-0911-b10-15

Google Scholar

[13] L. Voss, K. Ip, S.J. Pearton, R.J. Shul, M.E. Overberg, A.G. Baca, C. Sanchez, J. Stevens, M. Martinez, M.G. Armendariz, and others, SiC via fabrication for wide­band­gap high electron mo­ bility transistor/microwave monolithic integrated circuit devices, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phe­ nomena, vol. 26 no. 2 (2008) 487-494.

DOI: 10.1116/1.2837849

Google Scholar

[14] C. Zweben, W. Smith, and M. Wardle, Test methods for fiber tensile strength, composite flexural modulus, and properties of fabric­reinforced laminates, Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Fifth Conference), ASTM International (1979).

DOI: 10.1520/stp36912s

Google Scholar

[15] G. With, and H.H. Wagemans, Ball­on­Ring Test Revisited, Journal of the American Ceramic Society vol. 72 no. 8 (1989) 1538-1541.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Wereszczak, T. Kirkland, K. Breder, H. Lin, and M. Andrews, Biaxial strength, strength­size­ scaling, and fatigue resistance of alumina and aluminum nitride substrates, International Journal of Microcircuits and Electronic Packaging vol. 22 no. 4 (1999) 446-458.

Google Scholar

[17] S. Yoshida, and G. Harris, Properties of silicon carbide, INSPEC, London, UK, p.74 (1995).

Google Scholar

[18] S. Adachi, Properties of semiconductor alloys: group­IV, III­V and II­VI semiconductors, John Wiley & Sons vol. 28 (2009).

Google Scholar

[19] Opondo, N et al, manuscript in preparation.

Google Scholar