Study on Forging Permeability of 06Cr19Ni9NbN Steel during Hot Deformation

Article Preview

Abstract:

The hot compression tests of 06Cr19Ni9NbN steel were conducted at strains rate of 0.005-5s-1 and temperature of 900-1200 °C on Gleeble1500 thermal mechanical simulation tester. Based on stress-strain data, processing maps of the steel were established. According to the results of processing maps, the optimal process parameters of hot compression were obtained, which lies in the temperature range of 1000-1200°C and strain rate of 0.005-0.1s-1. And then, the process of plane strain compression of 06Cr19Ni9NbN steel was investigated and carried out at the temperature of 1000-1200 °C and reduction ratio of 10%-50%. After the hot compression tests, the room temperature tensile tests were carried out. The results indicated that the grain size and the mechanical properties gradually become stable when the reduction ratio increases to 30%, 34% and 40% at 1200 °C, 1100 °C and 1000 °C, respectively. Finally, a new model was presented to describe critical forging penetration efficiency, which is significant to optimize the steel forging process. Furthermore, the calculated results based on this new model were consistent with experimental results, indicating that the model is suitable to predict the critical FPE for the steel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1016)

Pages:

630-635

Citation:

Online since:

January 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Neissi,M. Shamanian and M. Hajihashemi, The Effect of Constant and Pulsed Current Gas Tungsten Arc Welding on Joint Properties of 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel to 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2016, 25, 2017-2028.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-016-2033-4

Google Scholar

[2] H.R. Zareie Rajani, H. Torkamani, M. Sharbati and Sh. Raygan, Corrosion resistance improvement in gas tungsten arc welded 316l stainless steel joints through controlled preheat treatment. Mater. Des. 2012, 34, 51-57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.071

Google Scholar

[3] Y.J. Jin, R.F. Li, Z.S, Yu and Y. Wang, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Plasma Arc Brazed AISI 304L Stainless Steel and Galvanized Steel Plates. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2016, 25, 1327-1335.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-016-1972-0

Google Scholar

[4] S.Y. Yang, Research into the GFM forging process. J. Mater. Process Technol, 1991, 28, 307-319.

Google Scholar

[5] Z.F. Wang, Z.S. Hu, Stream function method for final forging process analysis in radial forging, J. Northeastern Univ. 1994, 15, 35-39.

Google Scholar

[6] X.D. Zhou, X.R. Liu, J.B. Xing, Forging Penetration Efficiency of Steel H13 Stepped Shaft Radial Forging with GFM Forging Machine, J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 2012, 17, 315-318.

DOI: 10.1007/s12204-012-1276-y

Google Scholar

[7] Y.R. Yao, J.S. Liu, X.W. Duan, Y.X. Jiao, Dynamic recrystallization behavior of single-phase austenitic stainless steel 06Cr19Ni9Nb N, Trans. Mater. Heat. Treat. 2015, 36, 89-93.

Google Scholar

[8] X. H. Zhao, Y. Liu. Research on fatigue behavior of electron beam welding joint of 06Cr19Ni10 austenitic stainless steel sheet. Mater. Des. 2014, 57, 494-502.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.003

Google Scholar

[9] H. Zhang, K.X. Gu, J. Guo, X.D. Xue, J.J. Wang, Cryogenic Treatment of 06Cr19Ni10 Austenitic Stainless Steel, China materials conference, Beijing, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.749.187

Google Scholar