Failure Mode of GFRP Bar RC Beams Using GFRP Sheet as Shear Reinforcement

Abstract:

The objectives of this study are to analyze the pattern crack and failure mode of the GFRP concrete beam by using GFRP sheet as shear reinforcement (GFB) compared with the two types of the conventional reinforced concrete beam (CB and GB). One of the conventional reinforced concrete beams is reinforced with the steel bar (CB) and the other is the GFRP bar (GB) as longitudinal reinforcement. The nine beams were cast from one concrete batch with dimensions of 150 mm width, 250 mm depth and 3300 mm length. This study focuses on a simply-supported beam using a roller and pinned supports at the end of the beam. Control beam (CB) that using steel reinforcement shows three phases of deformation based on the deflection load curve, ie before crack, after crack, and after yield, while GB and GFB beams that use GFRP bar reinforcement only show two phases of linear deformation namely the deformation phase before cracking and after cracking. From the crack pattern, CB beams experience the flexural cracks which starting from the mid-span on the tensile side of the constant moment region and propagated to the compression region along with the increase in load. All GB beams show the crack starts from the mid-span and then propagates towards the support. Whereas GFB beam show the flexural cracks that occur in the constant moment region and in the shear span, also diagonal cracks that divide the GFRP sheet occurred. From the failure mode, CB experienced flexural failure, while GB experienced compression failure and shear failure in all GFB beams.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1091)
• Pages: 101-109
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-602gws
• Online since: June 2023
• Authors: Rita Irmawaty*, Fakhruddin Fakhruddin, Rudy Djamaluddin, Kusnadi Kusnadi
• Keywords: Failure Mode, GFRP Bar, RC Beam

References

[1] I. Balafas and C. J. Burgoyne, Environmental Effects on Cover Cracking Due to Corrosion, Cement and Concrete Research 40(9), (2010) 1429–40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.05.003

[2] T. Acosta, A. Andrés, N.G. Sergio, and T.G. Jorge, Residual Flexure Capacity of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Beams, Engineering Structures 29(6), (2007) 1145–52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.018

[3] L. Wang, et al, Effects of Stirrup and Inclined Bar Corrosion on Shear Behavior of RC Beams, Construction & Building Materials 98 (2015) 537–46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.077

[4] S. Sathyamoorthy, Rebar Industry in India – A Peek into Emerging Trends in Value Added Rebar, Frost & Sullivan Market Insight (2011), https://www.frost.com/prod/servlet/market-insight-print.pag?docid=246233426 (November 9, 2011).

[5] ACI 440.1R-06, Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars, Reported by ACI Committee 440, ACI Committee 440 (2003) 1–42.

DOI: 10.14359/51700867

[6] Chennareddy, Rahulreddy, and M.R.T. Mahmoud, Effect of Combining Near-Surface-Mounted and U-Wrap Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Strengthening Techniques on Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams, ACI Structural Journal 114(3), (2017).

DOI: 10.14359/51689443

[7] B. Benmokrane, O. Chaallal, and R. Masmoudi, Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic (GFRP) Rebars for Concrete Structures, Construction and Building Materials 9(6), (1995) 353–64.

DOI: 10.1016/0950-0618(95)00048-8

[8] Kusnadi, R. Djamaluddin, A.B. Muhiddin, and R. Irmawaty, Flexural Behaviour of GFRP Bar Reinforced Concrete Beam without Cover using GFRP Sheet as Shear Reinforcement, IJARET 11(6) (2020), 518-524.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.692.66

[9] A. El-nemr, E. Ahmed, and B. Benmokrane, Flexural Behavior and Serviceability of Normal and High Strength Concrete Beams Reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars, ACI Structure Journal 110 (2013), 1077–1088.

DOI: 10.14359/51686162

[10] Adam, A. Maher, Mohamed Said, Ahmed A. Mahmoud, and Ali S. Shanour, Analytical and Experimental Flexural Behavior of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymers Bars, Construction and Building Materials 84(July), (2015) 354–66.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.057