Low Cycle Fatigue Response of Additive Manufactured Advanced Structural Alloys: Insights into High Performance Alloy Fatigue Life

Abstract:

Additive Manufacturing enables the production of intricate geometries and products with improved strength-to-weight ratios, driving its applications in defence, aerospace, and automobile sectors. Maraging steel and Superalloy Inconel 625 are renowned for their excellent mechanical properties and are candidate materials for high performance applications. It is essential to study the fatigue behaviour of additively manufactured samples prior to their deployment in real working environments, as their mechanical properties and fatigue behaviour differ from those of conventionally manufactured materials. In the present study, low cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviour of Maraging steel (M300) and Inconel 625, at different strain amplitudes and heat treatment conditions were evaluated. Fractographic characterization was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To understand the effect of build orientation on LCF behaviour, the maraging steel samples were also tested in different build orientations (0^o and 90^o). It was found that build orientation significantly affected the fatigue life of additive manufactured maraging steel samples. The LCF study was also done at different strain amplitudes for Inconel 625 and results indicated that there was drastic decrease in fatigue life at higher strain amplitudes. It was observed that defects introduced due to layer wise processing of additive samples have adverse effect on fatigue life. Ultrasonic shot peening was also applied to the additively manufactured fatigue samples to examine its impact on fatigue life.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1175)
• Pages: 111-116
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-ZPm7eP
• Online since: January 2026
• Authors: N. C. Santhi Srinivas*, Kausik Chattopadhyay, Shreyasi Vasu, Kumar R. Pavan, Jaydeep Vishwakarma
• Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, Inconel 625, Low Cycle Fatigue, Maraging Steel, Powder Bed Fusion

References

[1] Wenzler, David L.; Jahns, Hendrik; Mueller, Johanna; Beuerlein, Kai-Uwe; Riegger, Felix; Diller, Johannes; Unglaub, Julian; Radlbeck, Christina; Hensel, Jonas; Mensinger, Martin; Thiele, Klaus; Zaeh, Michael F.. "Mechanical properties and microstructure of hybrid-manufactured 316 L using PBF-LB/M and DED-Arc/M." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2025): 1-12.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-025-15317-0

[2] Spierings, Adriaan B., Thomas L. Starr, and Konrad Wegener. "Fatigue performance of additive manufactured metallic parts." Rapid prototyping journal 19.2 (2013): 88-94.

DOI: 10.1108/13552541311302932

[3] Vishwakarma Jaydeep, Chattopadhyay K, Rajpurohit R.S, Rao G.S.and Santhi Srinivas N.C. "Low cycle fatigue behaviour of additive manufactured maraging steel: Influence of build orientation and heat treatment." Materials Letters 350 (2023): 134943.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134943

[4] Branco, R. J.D. Costaa, J.A. Martins Ferreiraa, C. Capelaa,b, F.V. Antunesa, W. Macek. "Multiaxial fatigue behaviour of maraging steel produced by selective laser melting." Materials & Design 201 (2021): 109469.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109469

[5] Mohamed AM, El-Sayed Seleman A, Abdelrahma M and Ahmed E., Strain-controlled fatigue performance of Inconel 625 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion process, International Journal of Fatigue, Volume 155, 2022, 106635.

[6] Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A, Bian L and Thompson S.M., An investigation into fatigue resistance of additively manufactured Inconel 625, Additive Manufacturing, Volume 13, 2017, Pages 1-12.

[7] Shreyasi Vasu and Santhi Srinivas N.C., "Enhancement in Low Cycle Fatigue Life of LPBF processed Inconel 625 Superalloy by heat treatment." Journal of Alloys and Compounds (2025): 180637.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.180637