Modeling the Effect of Lubricants on Surface Conditions in Plane-Strain Upsetting Tests

Article Preview

Abstract:

Skin-pass rolling is commonly used to adjust the surface quality of high-strength aluminum alloys. Lubrication plays an important role in this process, as it minimizes material adhesion to the work roll, extends its service life, and also influences the contact conditions and the final surface topography. However, most numerical studies represent lubrication only through an effective friction coefficient. In this work, a finite-element framework that explicitly accounts for lubricant entrapment in engineered surface pockets by using a coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) approach is introduced to investigate lubricant-topography interaction. The skin-pass rolling process is approximated by a plane-strain upsetting test to represent the parameters relevant for mapping the interaction between lubricant and mechanical stress, as the rolling process has a large number of influencing factors. The precipitation-hardenable aluminum alloy EN AW-6016 is modeled with rate-dependent plasticity based on experimental flow curves, while the lubricant is represented as a Eulerian material governed by an equation-of-state formulation. The effects of strain rate, friction and different lubricant filling levels in surface pockets are analyzed. The results show that variations in friction mainly affect the global force level, while the presence of lubricant leads to changes in local deformation and stress distributions. Fully filled pockets require higher forming forces due to lubricant compression, whereas partially filled pockets show behavior close to dry conditions. The CEL approach proves suitable for modeling lubricated plane-strain upsetting tests and provides a basis for further investigations of lubricated skin-pass rolling processes.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 1184)

Pages:

53-64

Citation:

Online since:

April 2026

Funder:

The publication of this article was funded by the RWTH Aachen University 10.13039/501100007210

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Hojda, M. Vogd, W. Kang, H. Pawelski, G. Hirt, Numerical Investigation into Aluminium Skin Pass Rolling (2016).

Google Scholar

[2] C. Wu, L. Zhang, Surface texture transfer in skin-pass rolling under mixed lubrication, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 286 (2025) 109858.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109858

Google Scholar

[3] M. Bloeck, Aluminium sheet for automotive applications, in: Advanced Materials in Automotive Engineering, Elsevier, 2012, p.85–108.

DOI: 10.1533/9780857095466.85

Google Scholar

[4] H. Kijima, N. Bay, Modelling of skinpass rolling by elasto-plastic analysis of plane strain upsetting, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 177 (2006) 509–512.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.113

Google Scholar

[5] H. Kijima, N. Bay, Contact Conditions in Skin-pass Rolling, CIRP Annals 56 (2007) 301–306.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.070

Google Scholar

[6] H. Kijima, N. Bay, Influence of tool roughness and lubrication on contact conditions in skin-pass rolling, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 4835–4841.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.01.004

Google Scholar

[7] L. Koch, Numerical mapping of the surface roughness during skin pass rolling of high strength aluminum alloys using the plane strain upsetting test, in: Material Forming: ESAFORM 2025, 2025, p.909–916.

DOI: 10.21741/9781644903599-97

Google Scholar

[8] M.B. Liu, G.R. Liu, S. Li, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics - a meshfree method, Computational Mechanics 33 (2004) 491.

DOI: 10.1007/s00466-004-0573-1

Google Scholar

[9] K. Liu, L. Lang, W. Zhang, M. Marai, B. Liu, Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian simulation of granular medium sheet forming process and experimental ınvestigation at elevated temperature, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88 (2017) 2871–2882.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-8996-3

Google Scholar

[10] G.T. Mase, G.E. Mase, Continuum mechanics for engineers, 2. ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1999.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Akbari, P. Asadi, Dissimilar friction stir lap welding of aluminum to brass: Modeling of material mixing using coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian method with experimental verifications, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications 234 (2020) 1117–1128.

DOI: 10.1177/1464420720922560

Google Scholar

[12] G. Łukaszewicz, P. Kalita, Navier-stokes equations: An introduction with applications, Springer, Switzerland, 2016.

Google Scholar

[13] M.A. Jandron, R.C. Hurd, J.L. Belden, A.F. Bower, W. Fennell, T.T. Truscott, Modeling of Hyperelastic Water-Skipping Spheres using Abaqus/Explicit.

Google Scholar

[14] R. Lachmayer, B.-A. Behrens, T. Ehlers, P. Müller, P. Althaus, M. Oel et al., Process-Integrated Lubrication in Sheet Metal Forming, JMMP 6 (2022) 121.

DOI: 10.3390/jmmp6050121

Google Scholar

[15] S. Bair, W.O. Winer, A Rheological Model for Elastohydrodynamic Contacts Based on Primary Laboratory Data, Journal of Lubrication Technology 101 (1979) 258–264.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3453342

Google Scholar

[16] D. Will, N. Gebhardt (Eds.), Hydraulik: Grundlagen, Komponenten, Schaltungen, 4., neu bearb. Aufl., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.

Google Scholar

[17] J. Slota, Ľ. Kaščák, L. Lăzărescu, Frictional characteristics of EN AW-6082 aluminium alloy sheets used in metal forming, AMME 41 (2024) 79–87.

DOI: 10.7862/rm.2024.8

Google Scholar

[18] Deutsche Institut für Normung e. V., Tribology; friction; definitions, types, conditions, quantities(DIN 50323-3), 1993.

Google Scholar