A New Ex-Situ Method for Real Contact Area Determination for Sheet Metal Forming

Abstract:

Experimental determination of the real contact area is essential for the development and validation of advanced friction models in sheet metal forming. However, existing experimental approaches are limited by the need for transparent counterfaces or third agents in the interface, high sensitivity to relocation errors, or unreliable assumptions about the contact shape. This study proposes a novel ex-situ method to determine the real contact area using topographical information from the original and deformed sheet surfaces. The approach identifies a minimum contact area with high confidence and reconstructs from it the full contact area. It provides the real contact area ratio, the contact topography and height distribution. The method is evaluated using results from normal load simulations based on the Pullen and Williamson model as the reference and is compared with other ex-situ methods from literature. Results demonstrate that the proposed method is robust against realistic relocation errors and yields more accurate contact area values than existing approaches. The method offers a reliable experimental tool for tribological analysis and friction modelling in sheet metal forming.

• Periodical: Materials Science Forum (Volume 1184)
• Pages: 85-96
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-Q77VIf
• Online since: April 2026
• Authors: Ainhoa Guinea*, Andrea Aginagalde, Eneko Saenz de Argandoña, Joseba Mendiguren, Wilson Tato, Iñigo Llavori, Liam Blunt, Alaitz Zabala
• Keywords: Ex-Situ Method, Normal Loading, Real Contact Area, Surface-Topography, Tribology

References

[1] D. Wiklund, B. G. Rosén, and A. Wihlborg, "A friction model evaluated with results from a bending-under-tension test," Tribol Int, vol. 42, no. 10, p.1448–1452, Oct. 2009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.05.008

[2] B. B. Mandelbrot, Dann. E. Passoja, and A. J. Paullay, "Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals," Nature, vol. 308, no. 5961, p.721–722, 1984.

DOI: 10.1038/308721a0

[3] D. Tabor, "Junction growth in metallic friction: the role of combined stresses and surface contamination," 1959. [Online]. Available: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/

[4] S. Zhang, D. Li, and Y. Liu, "Friction Behavior of Rough Surfaces on the Basis of Contact Mechanics: A Review and Prospects," Nov. 01, 2022, MDPI.

DOI: 10.3390/mi13111907

[5] H. Terwisscha-Dekker, A. M. Brouwer, B. Weber, and D. Bonn, "Elastic contact between rough surfaces: Bridging the gap between theory and experiment," J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 188, Jul. 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105676

[6] B. Weber, J. Scheibert, M. P. de Boer, and A. Dhinojwala, "Experimental insights into adhesion and friction between nominally dry rough surfaces," Dec. 01, 2022, Springer Nature.

DOI: 10.1557/s43577-022-00464-6

[7] P. Jan, B. Žugelj, and M. Kalin, "In-situ micro-asperity investigation of real contact area formation during sliding with the effects of roughness and normal load considered," Tribol Int, vol. 191, Mar. 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.109171

[8] J.Y. Kim, A. Baltazar, and S. I. Rokhlin, "Ultrasonic assessment of rough surface contact between solids from elastoplastic loading-unloading hysteresis cycle," J Mech Phys Solids, vol. 52, no. 8, p.1911–1934, Aug. 2004.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.01.006

[9] A.T. Filayev, A.V. Kornilov, and L. Wegrzyn, "Determination of the Actual Contact Area During Sliding Contact," Elsevier Sequoia S.A, 1981.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(81)90160-5

[10] K.L. Woo and T. R. Thomas, "Contact of Rough Surfaces: A Review of Experimental Work," Elsevier Sequoia S.A, 1980.

[11] A. Azushima, S. Kuba, S. Tani, and D. D. Olsson, "Direct observation of asperity deformation of specimens with random rough surfaces in upsetting and indentation processes," Wear, vol. 260, no. 3, p.258–264, Feb. 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.04.022

[12] J. W. Mcbride, "The Loaded Surface Profile: A new technique for the investigation of contact surfaces."

[13] B. A. Krick, J. R. Vail, B. N. J. Persson, and W. G. Sawyer, "Optical in situ micro tribometer for analysis of real contact area for contact mechanics, adhesion, and sliding experiments," Tribol Lett, vol. 45, no. 1, p.185–194, Jan. 2012.

DOI: 10.1007/s11249-011-9870-y

[14] Y. Xu, R. L. Jackson, Y. Chen, A. Zhang, and B. C. Prorok, "A comparison of nanoscale measurements with the theoretical models of real and nominal contact areas," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, vol. 234, no. 11, p.1735–1745, Nov. 2020.

DOI: 10.1177/1350650120905184

[15] T. Tsukizoe and T. Hisakado, "On the Mechanism of Contact Between Metal Surfaces: Part 2-The Real Area and the Number of the Contact Points," 1968. [Online]. Available: http://tribology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/jotre9/28542/

DOI: 10.1115/1.3601564

[16] M. P. Shisode, J. Hazrati, T. Mishra, M. B. de Rooij, and A. H. van den Boogaard, "Semi-analytical contact model to determine the flattening behavior of coated sheets under normal load," Tribol Int, vol. 146, Jun. 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106182

[17] S. Kucharski and G. Starzyński, "Contact of rough surfaces under normal and tangential loading," Wear, vol. 440–441, Dec. 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.203075

[18] A. Westeneng, "Modelling of Contact and Friction in Deep Drawing Processes," 2001.

[19] J. Pullen and J. B. P. Williamson, "On the plastic contact of rough surfaces," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 327, no. 1569, p.159–173, Mar. 1972.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1972.0038

[20] J. A. Greenwood and J. H. Tripp, "THE CONTACT OF TWO NOMINALLY FLAT ROUGH SURFACES," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineering, 1970.

DOI: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1970_185_069_02

[21] J. Hol, "MULTI-SCALE FRICTION MODELING FOR SHEET METAL FORMING," 2013. [Online]. Available: www.m2i.nl