Paper Titles

Modeling the Evolution of Orientation Distribution Functions during Grain Growth of some Ti and Zr Alloys
p.1163

Modeling Recrystallization of Aluminum Alloys: A Refined Approach to Particle Stimulated Nucleation
p.1169

Simulation of Ideal Grain Growth Using the Multi-Phase-Field Model
p.1177

Topology Based Growth Law and New Analytical Grain Size Distribution Function of 3D Grain Growth
p.1183

Phase-Field Modeling of Recrystallization - Effects of Second-Phase Particles on the Recrystallization Kinetics
p.1189

Phase-Field Modeling and Simulation of Nucleation and Growth of Recrystallized Grains
p.1195

Modeling Recrystallization for 3D Multi-Pass Forming Processes
p.1201

Stored Energy and Recrystallisation in Cold Rolled Steel
p.1207

Coupled Simulation of the Static Recrystallization in Hot Deformed Austenite on Mesoscale
p.1213

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vols. 558-559Phase-Field Modeling of Recrystallization -...

Phase-Field Modeling of Recrystallization - Effects of Second-Phase Particles on the Recrystallization Kinetics

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effects of second-phase particles on the recrystallization kinetics in two-dimensional polycrystalline structures were investigated. Numerical simulations of recrystallization were performed by coupling the unified subgrain growth theory with a phase-field methodology. Simple assumptions based on experimental observations were utilized for preparing initial microstructures. The following results were obtained: (1) The presence of second-phase particles retarded recrystallization speeds. (2) If the mean subgrain size was small enough recrystallized region covered whole system for various values of the particle fraction, f. (3) On the other hand, if the mean subgrain size was not small enough the progress of recrystallization was frozen at some point.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Recrystallization and Grain Growth III

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 558-559)

Pages:

1189-1194

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.558-559.1189

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2007

Authors:

Yoshihiro Suwa, Yoshiyuki Saito, Hidehiro Onodera

Keywords:

Computer Simulation, Phase Field Modellig, Recrystallization, Subgrain Growth, Zener Pinning

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M. Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena Pergamon, Oxford, (1995).

[2] Humphreys FJ. Acta Mater 1997; 45: 4231.

[3] Rollett AD, Mullins WW. Scripta Mater 1997; 36: 975.

[4] Humphreys FJ. Scripta Metall 1992; 27: 1557.

[5] Holm EA, Miodownik MA, Rollett AD. Acta Mater 2003; 51: 2701.

[6] Okuda K, Rollett AD. Mat Sci Forum 2002; 408: 413.

[7] Weygand D, Bréchet Y, Lépinoux J. Phil Mag 2000; B80: (1987).

[8] Radhakrishnan B, Zacharia T. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 2003; 11: 307.

[9] Radhakrishnan B, Sarma G, Zacharia T. Scripta Mater 1998; 39: 1639.

[10] Weygand D, Bréchet Y, Lépinoux J. Interface Sci 2001; 9: 311.

[11] Chen LQ, Yang W. Phys. Rev. B 1994; 50: 15752.

[12] Moelans N, Blanpain B, Wollants P. Acta Mater. 2005; 53: 1771.

[13] Moelans N, Blanpain B, Wollants P. Acta Mater. 2006; 54: 1175.

[14] Kazaryan A, Wang Y, Dregia SA, Patton BR. Acta Mater 2002; 50: 2491.

[15] Suwa Y, Saito Y, Onodera H. Comp Mat Sci, in press. doi: 10. 1016/ j. commatsci. 2006. 10. 025.

[16] Suwa Y, Saito Y. Mat Trans 2005; 46: 1208.

[17] Ma N, Kazaryan A, Dregia DA, Wang Y. Acta Mater 2004; 52: 3869.

[18] Read WT, Shockley W. Phy Rev 1950; 78: 275.

[19] Krill CE, Chen L-Q. Acta Mater 2002; 50: 3057.

[20] Suwa Y, Saito Y, Onodera H. Scripta Mater 2006; 55: 407.

[21] Suwa Y, Saito Y, Onodera H. Mat. Sci. Eng. A, accepted.

[22] Hillert M. Acta Metall. 1988; 36: 3177.

[23] Wöner CH, Hazzledine PM. Scripta Metall. 1993; 28: 337. 0 50 100 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 time, s' Average subgrain(grain) radius, g. p. <R0>=7. 85, f=0. 04 <R0>=11. 1, f=0. 04 <R0>=15. 8, f=0. 04 <R0>=7. 85, f=0. 0 <R0>=11. 1, f=0. 0 <R0>=15. 8, f=0. 0.

DOI: 10.7554/elife.32668.010