Paper Titles

Preface, Committees and Sponsors

Stress Analysis by Kossel Microdiffraction on a Nickel-Based Single Crystal Superalloy during an In Situ Tensile Test – Comparison with Classical X-Ray Diffraction
p.1

The Matrix Method for Data Evaluation and its Advantages in Comparison to the Sin²ψ and Similar Methods
p.7

On Faulting in Nanocrystallites of FCC Metals
p.13

MicroGap Area Detector for Stress and Texture Analysis
p.19

X-Ray Diffraction Determination of Macro and Micro Stresses in SOFC Electrolyte and Evolution with Redox Cycling of the Anode
p.25

Neutron Diffraction Analysis of Load Transfer in DP 600 Steel During In Situ Tensile Tests
p.31

Residual Stresses in Multilayer Welds with Different Martensitic Transformation Temperatures Analyzed by High-Energy Synchrotron Diffraction
p.37

Residual Stress, Texture, and Phase Investigation of Autogenous Edge Welds Using High Energy Synchrotron Radiation
p.43

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 681The Matrix Method for Data Evaluation and its...

The Matrix Method for Data Evaluation and its Advantages in Comparison to the Sin²ψ and Similar Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

This article gives an overview of different methods for data treatment in x-ray stress measurement, and how these methods should be replaced with the matrix method, which in general is more versatile, more accurate and, in most cases, also easier to handle. It also shows how much the accuracy could be improved by replacing the traditional methods with the matrix method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Residual Stresses VIII

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 681)

Pages:

7-12

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.681.7

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2011

Authors:

Balder Ortner

Keywords:

Matrix Method, sin²ψ Method, X-Ray Elastic Factors, X-Ray Stress Measurement

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Dölle, V. Hauk, Z. f. Metallkde., 69 (1978) 410–417.

[2] H. Dölle, V. Hauk, Z. f. Metallkde., 69 (1978) 682–685.

[3] H. Dölle: J. Appl. Cryst. 12 (1979) 489–501.

[4] B. Ortner: J. Appl. Cryst., 39 (2006) 401–409.

[5] J. Lu. Ed., Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses, The Fairmont Press, Lilburn, (1996).

[6] B. Ortner, Advances in X-ray Analysis, 50 (2007) 117.

[7] B. Ortner, Powder Diffraction, 22 (2007) 102.

[8] B. Ortner, T. Antretter, M. Hofmann, E. Werner, in A.R. Pyzalla, A. Borbély, H. P. Degischer Eds., Mat. Sci. Forum, Vol. 571–572 (2008) 225–229, Trans. Tech. Publ. (2008).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.571-572.225

[9] F. Barral et al., Met Trans. A 18 (1987) 1229.

[10] J. M. Sprauel et al., Proc ICRS2 (1989) 172.

[11] P. Van Houtte, L. De Buyser, Acta metall. Mat. 41 (1993) 323.

[12] B. Ortner, Advances in X-ray Analysis, 29 (1986) 387.

[13] R.A. Winholtz, J.B. Cohen, Aust. J. Phys. 41 (1988) 189.

[14] B. Ortner, Int. J. Mat. Res., 99 (2008) 233.

[15] B. Ortner, Advances in X-ray Analysis, 52 (2009) 763.

[16] B. Ortner, Powder Diffraction, 24-2-sup (2009) S16.

[17] H. Peiter, Handbuch der Spannungsmesspraxis, Vieweg, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden, (1992).

[18] V. Hauk, G. Vaessen, Z. f. Metallkde, 76 (1985) 102.

[19] V. Hauk: Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997).

[20] A. C. Vermeulen, Mat. Sci. Forum, 404–407 (2002) 35–42.

[21] U. Welzel et al., J. Appl. Cryst. 38 (2005) 1–29.

[22] C. Quaeyhaegens, G. Knuyt, L. M. Stals, J. Surf. Coat. Technol. 74–75 (1995) 104–109.

[23] C. Quaeyhaegens, G. Knuyt, L. M. Stals, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14 (1996) 2462–2468.

[24] I.C. Noyan, J.B. Cohen: Residual Stress, Springer New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo, (1987).

[25] S. Taira, K. Tanaka, T. Yamazaki, J. Soc Mat. Sci. Japan, 27–294 (1978) 251.

[26] B. Ortner, Advances in X-ray Analysis, 29 (1986) 113.