The Effect of High Gravity Field on the Hydrothermal Preparation of the Nanostructured Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

The nanostructured ZnS, CdS/CdCO3 and MnCO3 were prepared by the hydrothermal method with gravity field of 1000 /g in the oil/water system at 100-150 for 0.5h. The products were characterized by eld-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and BET method. The results showed that the ZnS samples obtained using ZnCl2 and Na2S2O3 as precursors at 100-120 for 0.5h were the polycrystalline microspheres self-assembled by the crystallites with the size of 3-25nm. The pore volume of polycrystalline microspheres decreased with the increase of the size of the applied gravity forces. The morphology of CdS/CdCO3 samples obtained at 100 for 0.5h was the flower-like structure, while the as-prepared samples at 120 for 0.5h were the nanoceramic microspheres in shape. The gravity force favors the formation of CdS/CdCO3 samples. Moreover, the MnCO3 polycrystalline flake can be obtained at 100-120 for 0.5h under gravity field of 1000 /g.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 745-746)

Pages:

78-83

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.L. Beecroft, C.K. Ober, Chem. Mater. 9 (1997) 1302.

Google Scholar

[2] C.B. Murray, C.R. Kagan, M.G. Bawendi, Science. 270 (1995) 1335.

Google Scholar

[3] O. Vidoni, K. Philippot, C. Amiens, B. Chaudret, M. Casanove, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38 (1999) 3736.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19991216)38:24<3736::aid-anie3736>3.0.co;2-e

Google Scholar

[4] A.M. Morales, C.M. Lieber, Science. 279 (1998) 208.

Google Scholar

[5] W.Q. Han, S.S. Fan, Q.Q. Li, Y.D. Hu, Science. 277 (1997) 1287.

Google Scholar

[6] C. Feldman, H.O. Jungk, Angew. Chem. 13 (2001) 372.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Yu, P.C. Gibbons, K.F. Kelton, W.E.J. Bubro, Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 359.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Cao, Z. Xu, H. Sang, D. Sheng, C. Tie, Adv. Mater. 13 (2001) 121.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Liu, J.A. Zapien, Y. Yao, X. Meng, C.S. Lee, S. Fan, Y. Lifshitz, S.T. Lee, Adv. Mater. 15 (2003) 838.

Google Scholar

[10] C. Wu, Y. Xie, J. Phys. Chem. B. 107 (2003) 13583.

Google Scholar

[11] B.L. Cushing, V.L. Kolesnichenko, O'Connor CJ, Chemical Reviews . 104( 9) (2004) 3893-3946.

Google Scholar

[12] F. Leroux, J.P. Besse, Chem. Mater. 13 (10) (2001) 3507–3515.

Google Scholar

[13] K. Egeblad, C.H. Christensen, M. Kustova, Chem. Mater. 20 (3) (2008) 946–960.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Yang, J.R.G. Evans / Materials Science and Engineering A. 379 (2004) 351–359.

Google Scholar

[15] J.E. Lee, N.J. Evans, Y.L. Shirley, Astrophysical Journal. 583(2) (2003) 789-808.

Google Scholar

[16] T. Mashimo, T. Ikeda, I. Minato, J. Appl. Phys. 90(2) (2001) 741.

Google Scholar

[17] J. Chen, W.J. Li, Chemical Engineering Journal. 168 (2011) 903–908.

Google Scholar