Synthesis and Characterization of Biodegradable Starch-Based Bioplastics

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study was carried out to evaluate the potential of plastic synthesized using bio-based starch. The method began with extraction of starch from chosen tubers with high content of starch; potato and yam. The samples were first grated, grinded and strained to obtain crude starch, which then centrifuged and rinsed to get pure starch. The starch was then reacted with hydrochloric acid to breakdown amylopectin to prevent the starch from becoming plastic-like. Finally, propan-1,2,3-triol was added as a plasticizer to increase the elasticity of the product. The chemical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the products were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), tensile strength tester and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The FTIR spectra of the product displayed the presence of O-H, C-H, C=O and C-O absorption peaks, which indicate the formation of bioplastic has already occured. The tensile strength obtained for potato and yam starch-based bioplastic are 0.6 MPa and 1.9 MPa, respectively. The result gained from TGA showed that 50% weight loss occurred at 250°C for potato and 310°C for yam-based plastic. The highly biodegradability of the plastic was proven using soil burial test, which observed the percentage of soil biodegradation for potato and yam-based bioplastic in 1 week duration is 43% and 26%, respectively. These bio-based plastics have exhibited good thermal and mechanical properties with high biodegradability that makes them a suitable alternative for the existing conventional plastics.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

673-678

Citation:

Online since:

March 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B. P. Mooney, The second revolution? Production of plant-based biodegradable plastics, Biochem J., 418 (2009) 219–232.

DOI: 10.1042/bj20081769

Google Scholar

[2] L. Zan, W. Fa and S, Wang, Novel photodegradable low-density polyethylene–TiO2 nanocomposite film, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40 (2006) 1681–1685.

DOI: 10.1021/es051173x

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Chen, Advantages of bioplastics and global sustainability, Applied Mechanics & Materials, 420 (2013) 209–214.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.420.209

Google Scholar

[4] A. Malik, S. Parveen, T. Ahamad, S. M. Alshehri, P. K. Singh and N. Nishat, Coordination polymer: Synthesis, special characterization and thermal behaviour of starch-urea biodegradable polymer and its polymer metal complexes, Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, (2010).

DOI: 10.1155/2010/848130

Google Scholar

[5] J. Doran-Peterson, D. M. Cook and S. K. Brandon, Microbial conversion of sugars from plant biomass to lactic acid or ethanol, Plant J., 54 (2008) 582–592.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03480.x

Google Scholar

[6] J. M. L. Dias, P. C. Lemos, L. S. Serafim, C. Oliveira, M. Eiroa, M. G. E. Albuquerque, A. M. Ramos, R. Oliveira and M. A. M. Reis, Recent advances in polyhydroxyalkanoate production by mixed aerobic cultures: from the substrate to the final product. Macromol. Biosci., 6 (2006).

DOI: 10.1002/mabi.200600112

Google Scholar

[7] M. A. Araújo, A. Cunha and M. Mota, Enzymatic degradation of starch-based thermoplastic compounds used in protheses: Identification of the degradation products in solution. Biomaterials, 25 (2004) 2687–269.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.093

Google Scholar

[8] J. F. Zhang and X. Z. Sun, Mechanical properties of PLA/starch composites compatibilized by maleic anhydride. Biomacromolecules, 5 (2004) 1446–1451.

DOI: 10.1021/bm0400022

Google Scholar

[9] G. J. L. Griffin, Starch polymer blends. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 45 (1994) 241–247.

DOI: 10.1016/0141-3910(94)90141-4

Google Scholar

[10] R. F. T. Strepto, Understanding the processing of thermoplastic starch, Macromolecular Symposia, 245 (2006) 571–577.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Delville, C. Joly, P. Dole and C. Bliard, Influence of photocrosslinking on the retrogradation of wheat starch based films, Carbohydrate Polymers, 53(4) (2003) 373–381.

DOI: 10.1016/s0144-8617(03)00141-3

Google Scholar

[12] S. Khoramnejadian, J. J. Zavareh and S. Khoramnejadian, Effect of potato starch on thermal and mechanical properties on low density polyethylene, Current World Environment, 8(2) (2013) 215–220.

DOI: 10.12944/cwe.8.2.06

Google Scholar

[13] M. B. Musa, M. J. Yoo, T. J. Kang, E. G. Kolawole, U. S. Ishiaku, M. K. Yakubu and D. J. Whang, Characterization and Thermomechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Potato Starch, Journal of Engineering and Technology, (2013) 9-16.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Szczepanowska and W. Wilson, Permanancy of reprographic images on polyester film, Journal of American Institute for Conservation, 39(3) (2000).

DOI: 10.1179/019713600806113185

Google Scholar

[15] A. P. R. Monica, L. R. Q. Bernabe and R. Saddys, Polypropylene/starch blends: Study on thermal and morphological properties, J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 58(1) (2013).

Google Scholar

[16] H. A. M. Wickramasinghe, S. Takigawa, C. Matsuura-Endo, H. Yamauchi and T. Noda, Comparative analysis of starch properties of different root and tuber crops of Sri Lanka, Food Chemistry, 112 (2009) 98–103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.05.046

Google Scholar

[17] A. Moongngarm, Chemical Compositions And Resistant Starch Content In Starchy Foods, American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 8 (2): 107-113, (2013).

DOI: 10.3844/ajabssp.2013.107.113

Google Scholar

[18] K. Scott-Dixon and B. St. Pierre, Sweet vs. regular potatoes: Which potatoes are really healthier?, http: /www. precisionnutrition. com/regular-vs-sweet-potatoes.

Google Scholar