Solderability and Interfacial Intermetallic Compound (IMC) Growth of Sn-Cu-Ni Solder with Additions of Germanium

Article Preview

Abstract:

The wettability of Sn-Cu-Ni with Germanium (Ge) additions of 0 ppm, 10 ppm, 60 ppm, 100 ppm and 200 ppm were investigated with Gen3 machine. The range of the wettability shows the lowest and the highest reading of wetting time and maximum force. Three different conditions were investigated which consist of as soldered, reflowed and aged. Further interfacial IMC observation was done for 0 ppm and 60 ppm of Ge to investigate the growth of interfacial IMC after thermal aging. From the measurement, the thickness of IMC for 0 ppm Ge is 2.075μm, 3.936μm and 4.502μm with aging time at 24,120 and 240 hours respectively. While for 60 ppm Ge, the IMC thickness are much lower with 1.8μm, 3.11μm and 4.154μm at the same aging time with 0ppm Ge. The results indicate that 60 ppm of Ge in Sn-Cu-Ni has the lowest wetting time, higher maximum force and slow IMC growth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

8-12

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.W. Yoon and S.B. Jung: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol 458 (2008), pp.200-207.

Google Scholar

[2] X. Wu, D. Cullen, G. Brist and O.M. Ramahi: IEEE Transactions On Advanced Packaging, Vol 31 (2008) pp.182-189.

DOI: 10.1109/tadvp.2007.914962

Google Scholar

[3] H. Tanaka, M. Tanimoto, A. Matsuda, T. Uno, M. Kurihara and S. Shiga: Journal of Electronic Materials, Vol 25 (1999), pp.1216-1223.

Google Scholar

[4] L.R. Garcia, W.R. Oso´Rio, L.R. Peixoto and A. Garcia: Journal Of Electronic Materials, Vol 39 (2009) pp.2405-2414.

Google Scholar

[5] V. Vuorinen, T. Laurila, T. Mattila, E. Heikinheimo, J.K. Kivilaht: Journal Of Electronic Materials, Vol 36 (2007), pp.1355-1362.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Laurila, V. Vuorinen, and J.K. Kivilahti: Materials Science and Engineering R, Vol 49 (2005), pp.1-60.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Yu, Y. Yang, P. Li, J. Chen and H. Lu : J Mater Sci Mater Electron, Vol 23 (2012), pp.56-60.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Choubey, H. Yu, , M. Osterman, M. Pecht, F. Yun, L. Yonghong and X. Ming: Journal Of Electronic Materials, Vol 37(2008), pp.1130-1138.

DOI: 10.1007/s11664-008-0466-8

Google Scholar

[9] P.E. Tegehal: IVF Industrial Research and Development Corporation. Sweden.

Google Scholar

[10] M.J. Rizvi, C. Bailey, Y.C. Chan and H. Lu: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol 438 (2007), pp.116-121.

Google Scholar

[11] P. Yao, P. Liu and J. Liu, P. Liu, and J. Liu: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol 462 (2008), pp.73-79.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Kumar and K.N. Prabhu: Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol 133 (2007), pp.61-89.

Google Scholar

[13] D.Q. Yu, C.M.L. Wu, C.M.T. Lau, L. Wang and J.K.L. Lai: Journal of Alloys and Compound, Vol 392 (2005), pp.192-199.

Google Scholar

[14] Sweatman, K: Global SMT & Packaging. (2009).

Google Scholar

[15] B.I. Noh, J.H. Choi, J.W. Yoon and S.B. Jung: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol 499 (2010), pp.154-159.

Google Scholar