Effect of Continuous Annealing Temperature on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a High Strength Cold-Rolled DP980 Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Continuous annealing processes were applied to a 980MPa cold-rolled dual phase steel (Fe-0.11C-2.5Mn-0.5Si-0.4Cr) and the effect of continuous annealing temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties was investigated. The microstructures were observed and analyzed by optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The mechanical properties were measured by uniaxial tensile tests. The results revealed that the steel is composed of a certain percentage of ferrite, martensite and perhaps a small amount of retained austenite as well. As the annealing temperature increased, the volume fraction of martensite reached to 67% from 48% and the morphology translated to lath-like from M/A island. As a consequence, the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and yield strength had a moderate increase from 1070 to 1110 MPa and 580 to 640 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, the fracture elongation rose to the maximum 12.6% firstly and then decreased to about 9.0%. The optimizing mechanical properties with UTS up to 1090 MPa, yield ratio about 0.54 and fracture elongation about 13% could be obtained at the annealing temperature of 790°C for 120s.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2144-2149

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Z.K. Teng, X.M. Chen, Edge cracking mechanism in two dual-phase advanced high strength steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 618 (2014) 645-653.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.101

Google Scholar

[2] H.Y. Xie, X.H. Dong, K. Liu, Z.Q. Ai, F. Peng, Q. Wang, F. Chen, J.F. Wang, Experimental investigation on electroplastic effect of DP980 advanced high strength steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 637 (2015) 23-28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.016

Google Scholar

[3] P. Chen, H.G. Armaki, S. Kumar, A. Bower, S. Bhat, S. Sadagopan, Microscale-calibrated modeling of the deformation response of dual-phase steels, Acta Mater. 65 (2014) 133-149.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.036

Google Scholar

[4] M.D. Taylor, K.S. Choi, X. Sun, D.K. Matlock, C.E. Packard, L. Xu, F. Barlat, Correlations between nanoindentation hardness and macroscopic mechanical properties in DP980 steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 597 (2014) 431-439.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.084

Google Scholar

[5] D.H. Kim, S.J. Kim, S.H. Kim, A.D. Rollett, K.H. Oh, H.N. Han, Microtexture development during equibiaxial tensile deformation in monolithic and dual phase steels, Acta Mater. 59 (2011) 5462–5471.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.020

Google Scholar

[6] S. Dillien, M. Seefeldt, S. Allain, O. Bouaziz, H.P. Van, EBSD study of the substructure development with cold deformation of dual phase steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 527 (2010) 947-953.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.009

Google Scholar

[7] J. Kang, Y. Ososkov, D. Embury, D.S. Wilkinson, Digital image correlation studies for microscopic strain distribution and damage in dual phase, Scripta Mater. 56 (2007) 999-1002.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.031

Google Scholar

[8] J. Kadkhodapour, A. Butz, S.Z. Rad, S. Schmauder, A micro mechanical study on failure initiation of dual phase steels under tension using single crystal plasticity model, Int J Plast. 27 (2011) 1103-1125.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.12.001

Google Scholar

[9] P. Tsipouridis, L. Koll, C. Krempaszky, E. Werner, On the strength of grain and phase boundaries in ferritic-martensitic dual-phase steels, Int J Mater Res. 102 (2011) 674-686.

DOI: 10.3139/146.110519

Google Scholar

[10] N. Jia, Z.H. Cong, X. Sun, S. Cheng, Z.H. Nie, Y. Ren, P.K. Liaw, Y.D. Wang, An in situ high-energy X-ray diffraction study of micromechanical behavior of multiple phases in advanced high-strength steels, Acta Mater. 57 (2009) 3965–3977.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.002

Google Scholar