The Influence of Cutting Conditions on Surface Roughness during Steel 100Cr6 Grinding

Article Preview

Abstract:

Machining of tool steels is often an important used technology. Products made from these materials are often used in mechanical engineering, and quality of workpiece surface roughness after machining respective grinding is one of the important parameters that to us speak about the quality of the machining process. The paper deals with the influence of cutting conditions when grinding bearing steel 100Cr (EN ISO) on machined surface roughness. This steel belongs to a group of bearing steels.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 261)

Pages:

215-220

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Byrne, Turning milling and grinding processes, London, Arnold, (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] I. D. Marinescu et all, Handbook of Machining with Grinding wheels, Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2007, 592 pp.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Madl, Surface Properties in Precise and Hard Machining, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 12, No. 13, 2012, pp.158-166.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2012/a/1213-2489/mt/12/2/158

Google Scholar

[4] M. Novak, Surface quality of hardened steels after grinding, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 11, No. 11, 2011, pp.55-59.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2011/a/1213-2489/mt/11/1/55

Google Scholar

[5] M. Novak, R. Dolezal, G–Ratio in hardened steel grinding with different coolants, Manufacturing Technology, Vo. 12, No. 12, 2013, pp.192-197.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2012/a/1213-2489/mt/12/2/192

Google Scholar

[6] M. Novak, Surfaces with high precision of roughness after grinding, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 12, No. 13, 2012, pp.66-70.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2012/a/1213-2489/mt/12/1/66

Google Scholar

[7] M. Novak, H. Kasuga, H. Ohmori, Differences at the Surface Roughness by the ELID and Grinding Technology, Manufacturing Technology, Vo. 13, No. 2, 2013, pp.210-215.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2013/a/1213-2489/mt/13/2/210

Google Scholar

[8] J. Valicek, J. Rusnak, M. Müller, P. Hrabe, M. Kadnar, S. Hloch, M. Kusnerova, Geometricke aspekty drsnosti povrchu klasickych a netradicnich technologii, Jemna mechanika a optika, Vol. 53, No. 9, 2008, pp.249-253.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Tavodova, The surface quality of materials after cutting by abrasive water jet evaluated by selected methods. Manufacturing technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2013, pp.236-241.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2013/a/1213-2489/mt/13/2/236

Google Scholar

[10] K. Kouril, R. Cep, A. Janasek, A. Kriz, D. Stancekova, Surface integrity at reaming operation by MT3 head. Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.193-199, (2014).

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2014/a/1213-2489/mt/14/2/193

Google Scholar

[11] K. Dziedzic, J. Jozwik, M. Barszcz, The Assessment of Tribiological Properties and the Condition of the Surface of Tool Steel for Hot Work Subjected to the Process of Friction. Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2014, pp.69-76.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/mt/16/1/69

Google Scholar

[12] Z. Pitrmuc, J. Capek, K. Kolarik, L. Beranek, J. Urban, Tool Geometry Influence on Surface Integrity of Machined Austenite Stainless Steel. Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.425-431, (2016).

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/mt/16/2/425

Google Scholar

[13] S. Malotova, R. Cep, L. Cepova, J. Petru, D. Stancekova, L. Kyncl, M. Hatala, Roughness Evaluation of the Machined Surface at Interrupted Cutting Process, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2014, pp.168-173.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/mt/16/1/168

Google Scholar

[14] Janos Kundrak, Csaba Felho 3D Roughness Parameters of Surfaces Face Milled by Special Tools Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2016, pp.532-538.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/mt/16/3/532

Google Scholar

[15] U. Prisco, A. Squillace, F. Scherillo, F. Coticelli, A. Astarita, Form and Dimensional Accuracy of Surfaces Generated by Longitudinal Turning, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2016, pp.595-600.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2016/a/1213-2489/mt/16/3/595

Google Scholar

[16] T. Hanes, P. Hvizdos, M. Tavodova, D. Kalincova, J. Hricova, P. Beno. Non-destructive Magnetic Evaluation of Ground Surfaces Made of Bearing Steel of Variable Hardness Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2014, pp.09-317.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2014/a/1213-2489/mt/14/3/297

Google Scholar

[17] M. Tavodova The surface quality of materials after cutting by abrasive water jet evaluated by selected methods, Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2014, pp.36-241.

DOI: 10.21062/ujep/x.2013/a/1213-2489/mt/13/2/236

Google Scholar

[18] K. Osicka, Prumerna aritmeticka uchylka drsnosti povrchu - statisticke vyhodnoceni plochy Strojirenska technologie, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2009, pp.30-32.

Google Scholar