Search results

The proposed variants are described as follows: Variant 1.
As and are random numbers which belong to the open interval ]0, 1[.
Table 1 Limits of reactive power generation (p.u) for IEEE 14-bus and 30-bus systems 14 -bus 30-bus 57-bus Bus no.
References [1] A.
In 2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE) (pp. 479-484).

Analysis showed that the pore size was governed by the porogen and not influenced by the SF/PVA ratio (Table 1).
Figure 7: ALP activity assay of hMSCs grown on developed scaffolds for 1 day, 7 days and 14 days.
References [1] R.
Pharmacol., 47 (1995) 479–486
Dev., 1 (2010) 404–408

Contents of Paper 1.
Conclusions References 1.
Fig. 1.
References [1] L.
Meas. 27 (1997) 479-488

Table 1 Concentrations of PCDD/Fs in flue gas in summer and autumn PCDD/PCDFs summer autumn PCDD/PCDFs summer autumn 2,3,7,8-TeCDD 0.00274 0.00247 2,3,7,8-TeCDF 0.0168 0.0198 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.0138 0.0112 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.0422 0.0338 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.0253 0.0107 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.0601 0.0552 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.0334 0.0190 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.143 0.0692 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.0258 0.0136 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.119 0.0703 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.174 0.137 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.00972 0.00342 OCDD 0.173 0.285 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.112 0.0819 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.570 0.278 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.0827 0.0337 OCDF 0.748 0.119 PCDDs (ng/Nm3) 0.448 0.478 PCDDs (ng I-TEQ/Nm3) 0.0200 0.0141 PCDFs (ng/Nm3) 1.90 0.765 PCDFs (ng I-TEQ/Nm3) 0.0795 0.0570 ratio of PCDDs/PCDFs 0.235 0.626 ratio of PCDDs/PCDFs(TEQ) 0.252 0.247 total PCDD/Fs (ng/Nm3) 2.35 1.24 total PCDD/Fs (ng I-TEQ/Nm3) 0.0995 0.0711 Table 2 Concentrations of PCDD/Fs in ambient air in spring ambient air upwind downwind PCDD/PCDFs
Southeastern Institute of Technology Wanfang primary school Guardhouse in Muzha MSWI Xinyi junior middle school 2,3,7,8-TeCDD 0.00128 0.000837 0.00225 0.00142 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.00304 0.00311 0.00616 0.00597 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.00274 0.00275 0.00512 0.00591 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.00517 0.00473 0.00987 0.0158 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.00359 0.00341 0.00719 0.0114 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.0229 0.0385 0.0675 0.111 OCDD 0.0709 0.125 0.182 0.212 2,3,7,8-TeCDF 0.0116 0.00945 0.0182 0.0165 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.0125 0.0117 0.0211 0.0189 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.0173 0.0183 0.0389 0.0330 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.013 0.0165 0.0357 0.0394 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.0117 0.0156 0.0365 0.0347 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.0138 0.0232 0.0670 0.0556 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.00128 0.00126 0.00305 0.00213 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.0414 0.0656 0.185 0.201 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.00809 0.0105 0.0331 0.0300 OCDF 0.0463 0.0708 0.176 0.152 PCDDs 0.11 0.178 0.280 0.364 PCDFs 0.177 0.243 0.615 0.583 PCDDs/PCDFs 0.619 0.734 0.456 0.624 Total PCDD/Fs 0.287 0.421
ND 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.298 0.0974 0.172 ND 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.145 0.0811 0.132 0.0354 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.302 0.150 0.260 0.0512 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.225 0.150 0.288 0.0512 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.833 0.929 1.32 0.256 OCDD 1.87 2.77 3.76 1.19 2,3,7,8-TeCDF 0.893 0.458 0.564 0.205 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.853 0.337 0.512 0.138 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.901 0.479 0.840 0.185 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.724 0.288 0.716 0.110 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.773 0.511 0.804 0.138 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.781 0.584 0.928 0.157 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.0649 0.0480 0.0669 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.67 1.78 2.39 0.425 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.109 0.166 0.196 ND OCDF 0.612 0.824 1.32 0.413 PCDDs 3.77 4.18 6.00 1.58 PCDFs 7.32 5.50 8.32 1.84 PCDDs/PCDFs 0.515 0.761 0.722 0.861 Total PCDD/Fs 11.1 9.68 14.3 3.42 PCDDs pg-I-TEQ/Nm3 0.323 0.0989 0.247 0.0175 PCDFs pg-I-TEQ/Nm3 0.829 0.467 0.779 0.172 Ratio of PCDDs/PCDFs(TEQ) 0.390 0.212 0.317 0.102 TEQ(pg I-TEQ/Nm3) 1.15 0.566 1.03 0.189 Average PCDD/Fs (pg/Nm3) 11.1 9.13(RSD=48.8，n=3) Average TEQ
Table 8 Concentrations of PCDD/Fs in soil in spring soil upwind downwind PCDD/PCDFs Southeastern Institute of Technology Wanfang primary school Guardhouse in Muzha MSWI Xinyi junior middle school 2,3,7,8-TeCDD 0.0314 0.0357 0.358 ND 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.159 0.187 4.92 0.0580 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.139 0.310 8.61 0.0380 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.285 0.576 37.2 0.120 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.250 0.554 22.9 0.102 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2.94 14.0 335 2.03 OCDD 32.0 479 1390 30.3 2,3,7,8-TeCDF 0.145 0.240 2.78 6.42 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.283 0.363 6.84 5.90 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.371 0.427 15.5 4.23 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.499 0.546 21.8 7.76 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.428 0.516 24.6 1.93 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.654 0.622 50.7 0.768 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.0766 0.0973 2.29 0.228 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2.11 2.96 195 2.74 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.206 0.556 47.2 1.06 OCDF 1.84 4.51 299 2.50 PCDDs 35.8 495 1800 32.7 PCDFs 6.61 10.8 666 33.5 PCDDs/PCDFs 5.41 45.7 2.70 0.974 Total PCDD/Fs 42.4 506 2470 66.2 PCDDs pg-I-TEQ/Nm3 0.240 0.893 14.4
Res. 1(1994)262

For example, consider an isotropic, elastic material- the stress and strain relations are determined as follows in cylindrical coordinates [33]:(a) Reproduction of test setup from [9, 31, 32] (b) Reproduction of ramp input from [9, 31, 32] (c) Schematic of test setup in current study (d) Instantaneous displacement used in current study Fig. 1: Comparison of experimental setups for measuring cartilage  σr σθ σz   = E (1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)    1 − ν ν ν ν 1 − ν ν ν ν 1 − ν     ϵr ϵθ ϵz   (1) or for strain in terms of stress: {ϵ} =   ϵr ϵθ ϵz   = 1 E    1 −ν −ν −ν 1 −ν −ν −ν 1      σr σθ σz   (2) According to Eq. 1, Poisson's ratio is needed in the confined compression case (ϵr = ϵθ = 0) to obtain stress in the z (vertical) direction: σz = [ E(1 − ν) (1 + ν)(1 − 2ν)] ϵz. (3) Poisson's ratio must be assumed or determined experimentally, which adds an additional parameter to the models using confined
Archive of Applied Mechanics 61(1):479--487 [2] Friswell M (2007) The response of rotating machines on viscoelastic supports.
International Review of Mechanical Engineering 1(1):32--40 [3] Elsharkawy AA, Nassar MM (1996) Hydrodynamic lubrication of squeeze-film porous bearings.
Wear 5(1):1--17 [6] Ateshian GA (2009) The role of interstitial fluid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication.
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 483(1):75--80

References [1] Y.
Proc., no. 814, pp. 1–7, 2013
Sedighi et al., “Analog Circuit Design Using Tunnel-FETs,” vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014
Technol., vol. 30, no. 1, 2015
Riel, “Tunnel field-effect transistors as energy-efficient electronic switches,” Nature, vol. 479, no. 7373, pp. 329–337, 2011

Glazov and Laird have shown that the minimum equilibrium separation distance for any of the known conventional patterning is in the order of 1 μm [3].
The embedded primary discontinuities tend to encourage grain coarsening to occur around them, the resulting microstructure is shown in Fig. 1.
The microstructure in Fig. 1 consists of three constituents of various grain sizes: (1) uf grains with mean grain size of 862 nm x 303 nm, (2) primary discontinuities with mean grain size of 63 nm x 31 nm, and lastly (3) equiaxed grains with grain size larger than 2 µm [5].
References [1] N.
Forum, 475-479 (2005) p. 4055 [20] Y.

Introduction Nanoparticles are defined as substances behaving as a whole unit in terms of their transport and properties, with diameters ranging from 1 to 100 nanometers [1].
Figure 1.
References [1] ISO/TS 27687.2008, 2008.
Kogel-Knabner, Release of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dissolved organic carbon, and suspended matter from disturbed NAPL-contaminated gravelly soil material, Vadose Zone J. 5 (2006) 469–479
Sci. 253 (2002) 1-8

Full length is 1 cm.
Figure 1.
Nat. 19(1) (2000) 55-60
Health Stud. 47(1) (2011) 1-20
Biol. 122 (1995) 479-485

(4) Figure 1.
New superconducting electron accelerator 3.1 Original Positron Beamline 3.1.1 Positron Production.
References [1] P.
A 422 (1999) 479-483
Methods A 274 (1989) 1-3