Search results

Table 1.
Fig. 1.
Sci., 1(9), 977
Silicon, 1-9
In 2021 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace) (pp. 479-484).

The experimental setup is depicted in Figure 1.
References [1] A.
Eng. 34 (2021) 1
Schulz, Additive Manufacturing of H11 with Wire-Based Laser Metal Deposition, Soldagem & Inspeção 22 (2017) 4, pp. 466–479
Eng. 59 (2020) 07, pp. 1

Table: 1 Properties of different compositions of cemented carbide [7, 15].
Author Work Material Input parameters and range Optimized Results 1.
Jangra et al. [31] WC-6%Co Taper angle (3-1.3 degree) Peak current (80-120A) Pulse on time (108-122µs) Pulse off time (30-50µs) Wire tension (6-10N) Dielectric flow rate (4-10LM-1) MRR: 2.52 mm/min.
References [1] R.M.
Tomadi, Surface integrity study in WEDM of tungsten carbide, Solid State Science and Technology, 16 (1) (2008), 1-11

Fig. 1.
Table 1.
References [1] V.M.
Johnsen, Materials and corrosion trends in offshore and subsea oil and gas production, Materials Degradation 1 (2017) 1-11
Carrera-Jota, Microstructural evolution and densification of Co-based alloy powder by spark plasma sintering for high-hardness applications, Coatings 14 4 (2024) 479

Table 4 Velocity combinations used in experiment Combinations Traverse speed u (mm/s) Pass 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 4 1 2 2 5 2 6 2 2 7 2 2 2 8 3 Depths of Cut in Multipass Operations.
Sd (mm) 4 4 4 Traverse speed u (mm/s) 1 1 2 (2 equal passes) Oscillation angle θ (degrees) - 6 6 Oscillation frequency F (Hz) - 9 9 Total depth of cut h (mm) 14.56 18.22 24.32 Increase in total depth of cut (%) - 25.1% 67.0% Table 5 shows some typical depths of cut produced by different cutting modes under the corresponding process conditions and with the same total cutting time.
Water Jet Technol., Vol. 1 (1991), pp. 65-71
Tools Manufact., Vol. 37 (1997), pp. 465-479
C1-1/C1-13

Reference [1] Yumei Yang, Jiaxiang Chen, Qinghua Zhu.
Anim. 2003, 31(1): 7-20
[16] Saaty T L:International Journal of Services Sciences. 2008, 1(1): 83-98
[17] Guohua Chen, Tao Liang, Huawen Zhang: Safety Science, 2009, 47（1）: 50-58
[24] Kalogirou S A, Bojic M: Energy. 2000, 25(5): 479-491

Table 1.
Table 1 shows the characteristics of CDW.
Fig. 1.
Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 1-11
Scientific Reports, 14(1), 671

Fig. 1.
Table 1.
References [1] A.
Dis., vol.70,no.1, pp. 74–79 ,January 1, 2011
Surg., vol.96,no.6, pp. 471–479 ,2014

Fig. 1.
References 1.
Biotechnol. 65, 1-8 (2004). 4.
Solids 318, 1-13 (2003). 24.
Polak, Tissue Eng. 11, 479-488 (2005). 33.

Basing on the composition shown in table 1 and table 2, if input power enhanced 5.3 MWh, anthracite feeding into the furnace would add to 1 t.
The formed freeze lining was shown in fig. 1.
Therefore, 5495390.378 kJ means 1526.497 kW was used to smelt 1 t ilmenite.
Input power /MW Ilmenite charging rate /tŸh-1 Requirement energy /MW Heat loss /MW IPR/kg ilmeniteŸMW-1 No.
References [1] S.L.