Similarity Laws and Model Test Approaches to Determine Hydrodynamic Performance of a Marine Turbine

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents the methodologies and approaches used in a Cavitation Tunnel or any other circulation channel to investigate the power extraction performance of a marine stream turbine. The paper first introduced model test similarity laws used in the Emerson Cavitation Tunnel (ECT) of Newcastle University to test a marine turbine in marine propeller cavitation tunnel; then based on these similarity laws to investigate the power extraction performance of a marine turbine in different approaches to control the rotation speed, namely: Torque Control and Rotation-speed control. A comparison was made by the tested experimental results. Torque Control is referred to the speed control strategy of using a generator to absorb the torque building up from the stream, on the other hand Rotation-speed control is to use motor to control rotation speed of the turbine. It indicates that both methods can be employed to investigate the hydro performance of marine stream turbine, with wider range of TSR can Rotation-speed Control test.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 694-697)

Pages:

665-672

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C.A. Douglas, G.P. Harrison and J.P. Chick. Life cycle assessment of the Seagen marine current turbine. Proc. IMechE Vol. 222 Part M: J. Engineering for the Maritime Environment (2007).

DOI: 10.1243/14750902jeme94

Google Scholar

[2] Fraenkel, P. L. Marine Current TurbinesTM Ltd's tidal turbines developments: the development of an entirely new energy conversion system. Part D Conference Proceeding of World Maritime Technology Conference (WMTC), 4th International Marine Renewable Energy, MAREC, London, 6 – 10 March 2006, p.79 – 88, IMarEST.

Google Scholar

[3] O'Doherty, T., Mason-Jones, A., O'Doherty, D. M., and Byrne, C. B.(2009b). Experimental and Computational Analysis of a model of a Horizontal Axis Tidal Turbine. In Proceedings of the 8th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, pages 833–841.

Google Scholar

[4] Sustainable Development Commission. Turning The Tide, Tidal Power in the UK, 2007. http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=6072007. [March 2009].

Google Scholar

[5] Department for Trade and Industry SEAFLOW Marine Current Turbines Summary Report. Report PS244. DTI, London 2006.

Google Scholar

[6] Atlar, M. A History of the Emerson Cavitation Tunnel and its Role in Propeller Cavitation Research. NCT'50, International Conference on Propeller Cavitation, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp.3-34, April, 2000.

Google Scholar

[7] D M Somers. Design and experimental results for the S814 airfoil, Airfoil, Incorporated, State College, Pennsylvania, Subcontractor Report: NREL/SR-440-6019 (1997).

DOI: 10.2172/437669

Google Scholar

[8] Wang D, Atlar M, Sampson R. An experimental investigation on cavitation, noise, and slipstream characteristics of ocean stream turbines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy 2007, 221(2), 219-231.

DOI: 10.1243/09576509jpe310

Google Scholar

[9] A.S. Bahaj, A.F. Molland, J.R. Chaplin, W.M.J. Batten. Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank. Renewable Energy. January 2006. 32(2007)407-426

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.01.012

Google Scholar

[10] ITTC (2011) "Report of the 26th ITTC Advisory Council to the Committee" 26th International Towing Tank Conference Proceedings, Volume 2, Rio de Janerio, Aug-Sept 2011.

Google Scholar